1 Department of Medical Education, OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH.
2 OhioHealth Research Institute, Columbus, OH.
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Apr;24(3):202-208. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17691862. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
Introduction Intensivist involvement for patients with sepsis is associated with decreased complications and mortality, and lower hospital resource utilization, but few studies have evaluated outcomes for patients exposed to electronic intensive care unit (eICU) telemedicine sepsis management in the emergency department (ED). In this study, we assess whether eICU cart exposure in the ED improved compliance with components of the 2010 Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles, length of stay (LOS), disposition and hospital costs. Methods An institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study was completed on patients with confirmed sepsis who presented to our ED from July 2010 through February 2013. Results Of 711 patient ED encounters, 314 cases met criteria for analysis (95 exposed and 219 non-exposed). Patient cohorts had similar demographics and comorbid International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition (ICD-9) diagnoses. The exposed cohort received antibiotics more quickly (122.3 minutes ±83.3 versus 163.4 minutes ±204.4, p = 0.043) and were more likely to have lactic acid levels drawn within six hours (98.9% vs. 90%, p = 0.019). The exposed cohort had a shortened ED LOS (in days) 0.08 ± 0.28 versus 0.16 ± 0.37, p = 0.036. Hospital LOS, disposition and death were similar in both cohorts. Total hospital costs for the exposed cohort were lower and less variable (US$19,713 ± 16,550 vs. US$24,364 ± 25068), but this was not significant ( p = 0.274). Discussion Our findings suggest that in individuals with confirmed sepsis, ED exposure to a telemedicine-based eICU cart impacted adherence to aspects of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommended bundle, but did not impact overall survival and medical costs.
介绍
脓毒症患者接受重症监护医生的治疗与并发症和死亡率降低以及医院资源利用率降低有关,但很少有研究评估在急诊科(ED)接受电子重症监护病房(eICU)远程医疗脓毒症管理的患者的结局。在这项研究中,我们评估了 ED 中 eICU 推车的暴露是否改善了对 2010 年存活脓毒症运动捆绑包的遵守情况,住院时间( LOS ),处置和医院费用。
方法
进行了一项机构审查委员会批准的回顾性队列研究,对 2010 年 7 月至 2013 年 2 月期间在我院 ED 就诊的确诊为脓毒症的患者进行了分析。
结果
在 711 例患者 ED 就诊中,有 314 例符合分析标准(暴露组 95 例,非暴露组 219 例)。患者队列的人口统计学和合并的国际疾病分类,第 9 版(ICD-9 )诊断相似。暴露组接受抗生素的速度更快(122.3 分钟±83.3 与 163.4 分钟±204.4 , p = 0.043 ),并且更有可能在六小时内进行乳酸水平检测(98.9%与 90%, p = 0.019 )。暴露组的 ED LOS (天数)更短 0.08 ± 0.28 与 0.16 ± 0.37 , p = 0.036 。两组的住院 LOS ,处置和死亡情况相似。暴露组的总住院费用较低且变化较小( US $ 19713 ± 16550 与 US $ 24364 ± 25068 ),但差异无统计学意义( p = 0.274 )。
讨论
我们的发现表明,在确诊为脓毒症的个体中,ED 接触基于远程医疗的 eICU 推车会影响对推荐捆绑包的存活脓毒症运动的某些方面的遵守,但不会影响整体生存率和医疗费用。