Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.
Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.
Stat Med. 2019 Jan 30;38(2):160-174. doi: 10.1002/sim.7574. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
Driver behavior is a major contributing factor for traffic crashes, a leading cause of death and injury in the United States. The naturalistic driving study (NDS) revolutionizes driver behavior research by using sophisticated nonintrusive in-vehicle instrumentation to continuously record driving data. This paper uses a case-crossover approach to evaluate driver-behavior risk. To properly model the unbalanced and clustered binary outcomes, we propose a semiparametric hierarchical mixed-effect model to accommodate both among-strata and within-stratum variations. This approach overcomes several major limitations of the standard models, eg, constant stratum effect assumption for conditional logistic model. We develop 2 methods to calculate the marginal conditional probability. We show the consistency of parameter estimation and asymptotic equivalence of alternative estimation methods. A simulation study indicates that the proposed model is more efficient and robust than alternatives. We applied the model to the 100-Car NDS data, a large-scale NDS with 102 participants and 12-month data collection. The results indicate that cell phone dialing increased the crash/near-crash risk by 2.37 times (odds ratio: 2.37, 95% CI, 1.30-4.30) and drowsiness increased the risk 33.56 times (odds ratio: 33.56, 95% CI, 21.82-52.19). This paper provides new insight into driver behavior risk and novel analysis strategies for NDS studies.
驾驶员行为是交通事故的主要原因之一,也是美国导致死亡和受伤的主要原因。自然驾驶研究(NDS)通过使用复杂的非侵入式车内仪器连续记录驾驶数据,彻底改变了驾驶员行为研究。本文使用病例交叉方法评估驾驶员行为风险。为了正确模拟不平衡和聚类的二项式结果,我们提出了一种半参数层次混合效应模型,以适应层间和层内的变化。这种方法克服了标准模型的几个主要局限性,例如条件逻辑模型中固定层效应的假设。我们开发了 2 种方法来计算边际条件概率。我们证明了参数估计的一致性和替代估计方法的渐近等效性。一项模拟研究表明,与替代方法相比,所提出的模型更有效和稳健。我们将模型应用于 100 车自然驾驶研究数据,这是一个具有 102 名参与者和 12 个月数据收集的大规模自然驾驶研究。结果表明,打电话增加了碰撞/接近碰撞的风险 2.37 倍(优势比:2.37,95%置信区间,1.30-4.30),而困倦使风险增加了 33.56 倍(优势比:33.56,95%置信区间,21.82-52.19)。本文为驾驶员行为风险提供了新的见解,并为自然驾驶研究提供了新的分析策略。