• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放牧改变了亚热带草原生态系统的净碳通量和全球变暖潜势。

Grazing alters net ecosystem C fluxes and the global warming potential of a subtropical pasture.

机构信息

Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 61801, USA.

Institute of Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 61801, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2018 Mar;28(2):557-572. doi: 10.1002/eap.1670. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1002/eap.1670
PMID:29280238
Abstract

The impact of grazing on C fluxes from pastures in subtropical and tropical regions and on the environment is uncertain, although these systems account for a substantial portion of global C storage. We investigated how cattle grazing influences net ecosystem CO and CH exchange in subtropical pastures using the eddy covariance technique. Measurements were made over several wet-dry seasonal cycles in a grazed pasture, and in an adjacent pasture during the first three years of grazer exclusion. Grazing increased soil wetness but did not affect soil temperature. By removing aboveground biomass, grazing decreased ecosystem respiration (R ) and gross primary productivity (GPP). As the decrease in R was larger than the reduction in GPP, grazing consistently increased the net CO sink strength of subtropical pastures (55, 219 and 187 more C/m in 2013, 2014, and 2015). Enteric ruminant fermentation and increased soil wetness due to grazers, increased total net ecosystem CH emissions in grazed relative to ungrazed pasture (27-80%). Unlike temperate, arid, and semiarid pastures, where differences in CH emissions between grazed and ungrazed pastures are mainly driven by enteric ruminant fermentation, our results showed that the effect of grazing on soil CH emissions can be greater than CH produced by cattle. Thus, our results suggest that the interactions between grazers and soil hydrology affecting soil CH emissions play an important role in determining the environmental impacts of this management practice in a subtropical pasture. Although grazing increased total net ecosystem CH emissions and removed aboveground biomass, it increased the net storage of C and decreased the global warming potential associated with C fluxes of pasture by increasing its net CO sink strength.

摘要

放牧对亚热带和热带地区牧场碳通量及其对环境的影响尚不确定,尽管这些系统是全球碳储量的重要组成部分。我们利用涡度相关技术研究了放牧如何影响亚热带牧场的净生态系统 CO 和 CH 交换。在放牧牧场和相邻牧场的前三年禁牧期间,进行了几个干湿季节性循环的测量。放牧增加了土壤湿度,但对土壤温度没有影响。通过去除地上生物量,放牧减少了生态系统呼吸(R)和总初级生产力(GPP)。由于 R 的减少大于 GPP 的减少,放牧一直增加亚热带牧场的净 CO 汇强度(2013 年、2014 年和 2015 年分别增加 55、219 和 187 更多 C/m)。反刍动物发酵和放牧引起的土壤湿度增加,使放牧牧场的总净生态系统 CH 排放量高于未放牧牧场(27-80%)。与温带、干旱和半干旱牧场不同,放牧和未放牧牧场之间 CH 排放的差异主要受反刍动物发酵的驱动,我们的结果表明,放牧对土壤 CH 排放的影响可能大于牛产生的 CH。因此,我们的结果表明,放牧者与土壤水文学相互作用影响土壤 CH 排放,在确定这种管理实践对亚热带牧场的环境影响方面起着重要作用。尽管放牧增加了总净生态系统 CH 排放量并去除了地上生物量,但通过增加其净 CO 汇强度,增加了 C 的净储存并减少了与 C 通量相关的全球变暖潜势。

相似文献

1
Grazing alters net ecosystem C fluxes and the global warming potential of a subtropical pasture.放牧改变了亚热带草原生态系统的净碳通量和全球变暖潜势。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Mar;28(2):557-572. doi: 10.1002/eap.1670. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
2
The impact of water management practices on subtropical pasture methane emissions and ecosystem service payments.水管理措施对亚热带牧场甲烷排放和生态系统服务支付的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Jun;27(4):1199-1209. doi: 10.1002/eap.1514. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
3
Radiative forcing of methane fluxes offsets net carbon dioxide uptake for a tropical flooded forest.甲烷通量的辐射强迫抵消了热带淹没森林的净二氧化碳吸收。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jun;25(6):1967-1981. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14615. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
Grazing management contributions to net global warming potential: a long-term evaluation in the Northern Great Plains.放牧管理对净全球变暖潜势的贡献:大平原北部的长期评估。
J Environ Qual. 2010 Apr 13;39(3):799-809. doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0272. Print 2010 May-Jun.
5
Effect of urbanization on soil methane and nitrous oxide fluxes in subtropical Australia.城市化对澳大利亚亚热带土壤甲烷和氧化亚氮通量的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Dec;24(12):5695-5707. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14444. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
6
Agricultural peatland restoration: effects of land-use change on greenhouse gas (CO2 and CH4) fluxes in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.农业泥炭地恢复:土地利用变化对萨克拉门托-圣华金三角洲温室气体(CO2 和 CH4)通量的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Feb;21(2):750-65. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12745. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
7
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy exchange in wet and dry season rice: eddy covariance-based approach.干湿季水稻的温室气体排放与能量交换:涡度相关法。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jun 25;190(7):423. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6805-1.
8
Methane emissions from beef cattle grazing on semi-natural upland and improved lowland grasslands.肉牛在半天然高地和改良低地草原放牧时的甲烷排放。
Animal. 2015 Jan;9(1):130-7. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002067. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
9
Habitat type determines herbivory controls over CO2 fluxes in a warmer Arctic.栖息地类型决定了食草作用对气候变暖的北极地区二氧化碳通量的控制。
Ecology. 2008 Aug;89(8):2103-16. doi: 10.1890/07-1601.1.
10
Impacts of climate and land use on N O and CH fluxes from tropical ecosystems in the Mt. Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚乞力马扎罗山地区气候和土地利用对热带生态系统氮氧化物和甲烷通量的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Mar;24(3):1239-1255. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13944. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Reply to Wang et al.: Uncertainty of terrestrial ecosystem CO exchange of the Tibetan Plateau.回复王等人:青藏高原陆地生态系统碳交换的不确定性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 14;119(24):e2205799119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205799119. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Emerging approaches to measure photosynthesis from the leaf to the ecosystem.从叶片到生态系统的光合作用测量方法的新进展。
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2021 May 21;5(2):261-274. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20200292.