• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2016年鼻出血:全国管理审计

Epistaxis 2016: national audit of management.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2017 Dec;131(12):1131-1141. doi: 10.1017/S002221511700202X.

DOI:10.1017/S002221511700202X
PMID:29280693
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epistaxis is a common condition that can be associated with significant morbidity, and it places a considerable burden on our healthcare system. This national audit of management sought to assess current practice against newly created consensus recommendations and to expand our current evidence base.

METHODS

The management of epistaxis patients who met the inclusion criteria, at 113 registered sites across the UK, was compared with audit standards during a 30-day window. Data were further utilised for explorative analysis.

RESULTS

Data for 1826 cases were uploaded to the database, representing 94 per cent of all cases that met the inclusion criteria at participating sites. Sixty-two per cent of patients were successfully treated by ENT clinicians within 24 hours. The 30-day recurrent presentation rate across the dataset was 13.9 per cent. Significant event analysis revealed an all-cause 30-day mortality rate of 3.4 per cent.

CONCLUSION

Audit findings demonstrate a varying alignment with consensus guidance, with explorative analysis countering some previously well-established tenets of management.

摘要

背景

鼻出血是一种常见病症,可能伴有严重的发病率,给我们的医疗系统带来相当大的负担。这项全国性的管理审计旨在对照新制定的共识性建议评估当前的治疗方法,并扩充我们现有的证据基础。

方法

在30天的时间范围内,将英国113个注册地点符合纳入标准的鼻出血患者的治疗情况与审计标准进行比较。数据进一步用于探索性分析。

结果

1826例病例的数据被上传至数据库,占参与地点符合纳入标准的所有病例的94%。62%的患者在24小时内由耳鼻喉科临床医生成功治疗。整个数据集的30天复发率为13.9%。重大事件分析显示全因30天死亡率为3.4%。

结论

审计结果表明与共识性指导的一致性存在差异,探索性分析对一些先前确立的治疗原则提出了挑战。

相似文献

1
Epistaxis 2016: national audit of management.2016年鼻出血:全国管理审计
J Laryngol Otol. 2017 Dec;131(12):1131-1141. doi: 10.1017/S002221511700202X.
2
The British Rhinological Society multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on the hospital management of epistaxis.英国鼻科学会关于鼻出血医院管理的多学科共识建议。
J Laryngol Otol. 2017 Dec;131(12):1142-1156. doi: 10.1017/S0022215117002018.
3
Epistaxis and mortality.鼻出血与死亡率。
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Dec;132(12):1061-1066. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118002013. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
4
A multi-centre audit of epistaxis management in England: is there a case for a national review of practice?英格兰鼻出血管理的多中心审计:是否有必要对实践进行全国性审查?
J Laryngol Otol. 2015 May;129(5):454-7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115000596. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
5
National prospective observational study of inpatient management of adults with epistaxis - a National Trainee Research Collaborative delivered investigation.全国前瞻性观察性研究:成人鼻出血的住院管理——国家住院医师研究协作组的调查结果。
Rhinology. 2019 Jun 1;57(3):180-189. doi: 10.4193/Rhin18.239.
6
ENT audit and research in the era of trainee collaboratives.耳鼻喉科的审核与研究在学员协作的时代。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;275(7):1935-1938. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5009-1. Epub 2018 May 26.
7
The role of surgical audit in improving patient management; nasal haemorrhage: an audit study.手术审计在改善患者管理中的作用;鼻出血:一项审计研究。
BMC Surg. 2007 Sep 13;7:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-7-19.
8
Epistaxis management at Guy's Hospital, 2009-2011: full audit cycles.盖伊医院2009 - 2011年鼻出血处理:完整审计周期
J Laryngol Otol. 2014 Jan;128(1):82-5. doi: 10.1017/S0022215113003137. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
9
Admission avoidance in acute epistaxis: A prospective national audit during the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic.急性鼻出血患者的入院规避:COVID-19 大流行初期的全国前瞻性审计。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2021 May;46(3):577-586. doi: 10.1111/coa.13716. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
[Interpretation of the guidelines for multidisciplinary treatment of epistaxis of the British Academy of Rhinology].[英国鼻科学会鼻出血多学科治疗指南解读]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Nov;33(11):1022-1026. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2019.11.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring knowledge of first aid in epistaxis-25 years on.25年后对鼻出血急救知识的探索。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 15;20(1):e0315092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315092. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictive factors for severe epistaxis in a tertiary center of Tunisia.突尼斯某三级医疗中心严重鼻出血的预测因素
Tunis Med. 2024 Dec 5;102(12):1048-1054. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i12.5210.
3
Outpatient Management of Epistaxis During COVID-19 to Reduce Inpatient Stay: A Quality Improvement Project.COVID-19期间鼻出血的门诊管理以减少住院时间:一项质量改进项目。
Cureus. 2022 Oct 29;14(10):e30858. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30858. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on non-elective otolaryngology admissions and a positive change in clinical practice.新冠疫情对非择期耳鼻喉科住院治疗的影响以及临床实践中的积极变化。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Jul;103(7):496-498. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0100.
5
Shorter hospital stays in epistaxis patients with atrial fibrillation when taking rivaroxaban or apixaban versus phenprocoumon.与使用苯丙香豆素相比,房颤患者使用利伐沙班或阿哌沙班时,其鼻出血患者的住院时间更短。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Apr;47(3):384-391. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01824-x.
6
Tranexamic acid for patients with nasal haemorrhage (epistaxis).氨甲环酸用于鼻出血患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 31;12(12):CD004328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004328.pub3.
7
ENT audit and research in the era of trainee collaboratives.耳鼻喉科的审核与研究在学员协作的时代。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;275(7):1935-1938. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5009-1. Epub 2018 May 26.