Menon Vidya P, Prasanna Preetha, Edathadathil Fabia, Balachandran Sabarish, Moni Merlin, Sathyapalan Dipu, Pai Rajesh D, Singh Sanjeev
Departments of General Medicine (Drs Menon, Moni, and Sathyapalan), Allied Health Sciences (Ms Edathadathil), and Emergency Medicine (Dr Balachandran), Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Ponekkara, Kochi, India (Ms Prasanna and Drs Pai and Singh).
Qual Manag Health Care. 2018 Jan/Mar;27(1):39-49. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000160.
To assess impact of medical emergency team (MET) in reducing "out-of-ICU" cardiopulmonary arrests and identify barriers to its optimal utilization.
Frequently observed critical clinical signs and laboratory values of "out-of-ICU" crashes were used to develop Amrita Early Warning Criteria.
A physician-led MET was established to respond to code MET, activated by a primary nurse.
Rates of "out-of-ICU" cardiopulmonary arrests per 1000 admissions were compared in pre-MET (2013-2014) and post-MET periods (2014-2016) along with disposition following MET and mortality. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used for comparative analysis.
For continued quality improvement, a Likert agreement scale questionnaire collated the nurse's feedback on MET. 386 Code MET were recorded with an activation rate of 18.8 per 1000 inpatients for 2014-2016. Common MET triggers were desaturation (53%), seizure (10%), and syncope (9%). Seventy-one percent of activations were attended within 5 minutes, with 45% reported during nurse's night shift hours. Medical emergency team interventions resulted in 59% being shifted to ICU. In the "post-MET" period, "Cold Blue" dose reduced from 6.9 in 2013-2014 to 2.6 (P = .0002) in 2014-2015 and 3.2 (P = .01) in 2015-2016. Ninety-three percent of the Code Blues with prior MET calls were "delayed MET" and 28% of the Code Blues without prior MET activation were "missed MET." Nurse's feedback revealed that 46% lacked knowledge of correct MET activation process while 31% expressed a fear of reprisal for inappropriate activation.
Although MET intervention was successful in significantly reducing "out-of-ICU" Code Blues, focused training of nurses is required for continued quality improvement.
评估医疗应急团队(MET)在减少“重症监护室外”心肺骤停方面的影响,并确定其最佳利用的障碍。
利用“重症监护室外”危急情况中经常观察到的关键临床体征和实验室值制定了阿姆里塔早期预警标准。
成立了由医生领导的MET,以应对由初级护士启动的MET代码。
比较了MET实施前(2013 - 2014年)和MET实施后(2014 - 2016年)每1000例入院患者的“重症监护室外”心肺骤停发生率,以及MET后的处置情况和死亡率。采用描述性统计和逻辑回归进行比较分析。
为持续改进质量,通过李克特同意量表问卷收集护士对MET的反馈。2014 - 2016年共记录了386次MET代码,激活率为每1000名住院患者18.8次。常见的MET触发因素为血氧饱和度下降(53%)、癫痫发作(10%)和晕厥(9%)。71%的激活在5分钟内得到响应,45%的激活报告发生在护士夜班期间。医疗应急团队的干预使59%的患者被转至重症监护室。在“MET实施后”期间,“蓝色急救”剂量从2013 - 2014年的6.9降至2014 - 2015年的2.6(P = 0.0002)和2015 - 2016年的3.2(P = 0.01)。之前有MET呼叫的蓝色急救病例中,93%为“延迟MET”,而之前未激活MET的蓝色急救病例中,28%为“漏诊MET”。护士的反馈显示,46%的人对正确的MET激活流程缺乏了解,31%的人表示担心因不当激活而受到报复。
尽管MET干预成功显著减少了“重症监护室外”的蓝色急救情况,但为持续改进质量,仍需要对护士进行重点培训。