Al-Rajhi Amjad, Mardini Louay, Jayaraman Dev
Critical Care Medicine Department, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Critical Care Medicine Department, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Intensive Care Med. 2016 Aug;31(7):478-84. doi: 10.1177/0885066615583794. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
Rapid response teams (RRTs) were developed to promote assessment of and early intervention for clinically deteriorating hospitalized patients. Although the ideal composition of RRTs is not known, their implementation does require significant resources.
To test the effectiveness of a dedicated daytime/weekday intensive care unit (ICU) consult service without formal training of ward teams.
Pre- and postintervention study with weekends/nights during implementation period acting as a concurrent control.
An adult tertiary care university center in Montreal without an RRT.
A daytime/weekday ICU consult service with a dedicated intensivist.
Total hospital mortality rate did not differ between the control and the implementation period (6.65% vs 6.60%; P = .84). The hospital code blue rates also did not differ (1.21/1000 vs 1.14/1000 patient days; P = .58). In contrast, 30-day mortality of patients admitted to the ICU following an ICU consult decreased (39% vs 24% P = .01). Multivariate analysis confirmed this effect on 30-day mortality (odds ratio for implementation period: 0.53 [95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.85] P = .009). The 14-day ICU readmission rate was reduced with the intervention (5.1% vs 4.1%; P < .001). The effect on 30-day mortality and ICU readmissions were only present during daytime/weekdays.
Implementation of an ICU consult service without any formal afferent limb training was associated with decreased mortality and 14-day readmission rates of patients admitted to the ICU. In contrast, hospital-wide mortality and code blue rates were unaffected.
快速反应小组(RRTs)旨在促进对临床病情恶化的住院患者进行评估和早期干预。尽管RRTs的理想组成尚不清楚,但其实施确实需要大量资源。
测试在不对病房团队进行正规培训的情况下,专门的日间/工作日重症监护病房(ICU)会诊服务的有效性。
在实施期间,以前后干预研究,将周末/夜间作为同期对照。
蒙特利尔的一家成人三级护理大学中心,该中心没有RRT。
提供由一名专职重症监护医生负责的日间/工作日ICU会诊服务。
对照期和实施期的医院总死亡率无差异(6.65%对6.60%;P = 0.84)。医院的蓝色急救代码率也无差异(1.21/1000对1.14/1000患者日;P = 0.58)。相比之下,在接受ICU会诊后入住ICU的患者的30天死亡率有所下降(39%对24%,P = 0.01)。多变量分析证实了对30天死亡率的这一影响(实施期的优势比:0.53[95%置信区间:0.33 - 0.85],P = 0.009)。干预措施降低了14天的ICU再入院率(5.1%对4.1%;P < 0.001)。对30天死亡率和ICU再入院率的影响仅在日间/工作日出现。
在没有任何正规传入环节培训的情况下实施ICU会诊服务,与入住ICU患者的死亡率降低和14天再入院率降低相关。相比之下,全院死亡率和蓝色急救代码率未受影响。