Moore M N
School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Nurs Res. 1989 Mar-Apr;38(2):111-6.
Reward allocation in selected American universities was investigated using tenure receipt as the most valuable faculty reward. Because American universities are highly stratified organizations, several representative disciplines and an integrative model were used to examine interdisciplinary perceptions of reward criteria. Three hundred sixty six academicians with professional appointments in physics, psychology, sociology, nursing, and management were surveyed by a mailed questionnaire, the Tenure Decision Factor Inventory (TDFI) composed of Achievement (ACH) Ascriptive (ASCRIPT), Internal Political (IP), and External Political (EP) criteria related to tenure receipt. Significant main effects were shown by both discipline and reward criteria. Perceptions of nursing faculty distinguished nursing from the four other study disciplines. Although many factors influenced tenure decisions, the achievement criteria were identified by members of all disciplines as the most important determinants during tenure review.
以获得终身教职作为最有价值的教师奖励，对美国部分大学的奖励分配情况进行了调查。由于美国大学是高度分层的组织，因此采用了几个具有代表性的学科和一个综合模型来检验对奖励标准的跨学科认知。通过邮寄问卷《终身教职决定因素量表》（TDFI），对366名在物理学、心理学、社会学、护理学和管理学领域担任专业职务的院士进行了调查，该量表由与获得终身教职相关的成就（ACH）、归属（ASCRIPT）、内部政治（IP）和外部政治（EP）标准组成。学科和奖励标准均显示出显著的主效应。护理教师的认知将护理学与其他四个研究学科区分开来。尽管许多因素影响终身教职的决定，但所有学科的成员都认为成就标准是终身教职评审期间最重要的决定因素。
