Acacio-Claro Paulyn Jean, Koivusilta Leena Kristiina, Borja Judith Rafaelita, Rimpelä Arja Hannele
Faculty of Social Sciences, Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Research, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):980. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4990-4.
Despite robust evidence on the inverse relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and mortality, deviations from expected results have been observed likely due to school achievement and psychosocial resources, termed as "reserve capacity." Since adolescence is a critical period in developing sound psychological and behavioural patterns and adolescent markers of SES were seldom used, we determine if family SES in adolescence predicts later mortality. We also study how reserve capacity (perceived health, health-promoting behaviour and social support) and school achievement modify this relationship and reduce the negative effects of low SES.
A longitudinal study was designed by linking baseline data on 12 to 18 year-old Finns in 1985-95 (N = 41,833) from the Adolescent Health and Lifestyle Surveys with register data on mortality and SES from Statistics Finland. Average follow-up time was 18.4 years with a total of 770,161 person-years. Cox regression models, stratified by sex, were fitted to determine the effects of variables measured during adolescence: family SES, reserve capacity and school achievement on mortality risk.
All reserve capacity dimensions significantly predicted mortality in boys. Perceived health and social support predicted that in girls. Adolescents with the lowest school achievement were more than twice at risk of dying compared to those with better school performance. Low SES increased the risk of death in boys (Hazard ratios: 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4) but not in girls. Reserve capacity and school achievement weakened the effects of low SES on boys' risk of death.
High reserve capacity and good school achievement in adolescence significantly reduce the risk of mortality. In boys, these also mitigate the negative effect of low SES on mortality. These findings underscore the roles of reserve capacity and school achievement during adolescence as likely causal or modifying factors in SES-health inequalities.
尽管有充分证据表明社会经济地位(SES)与死亡率之间存在反比关系,但由于学业成绩和心理社会资源(即“储备能力”),已观察到与预期结果的偏差。由于青春期是形成健全心理和行为模式的关键时期,且很少使用SES的青少年指标,因此我们确定青春期的家庭SES是否能预测后期死亡率。我们还研究储备能力(感知健康、促进健康行为和社会支持)和学业成绩如何调节这种关系并减少低SES的负面影响。
通过将1985 - 1995年12至18岁芬兰人的基线数据(来自青少年健康与生活方式调查,N = 41,833)与芬兰统计局的死亡率和SES登记数据相链接,设计了一项纵向研究。平均随访时间为18.4年,总计770,161人年。采用按性别分层的Cox回归模型,以确定青春期测量的变量(家庭SES、储备能力和学业成绩)对死亡风险的影响。
所有储备能力维度均显著预测男孩的死亡率。感知健康和社会支持预测女孩的死亡率。学业成绩最差的青少年死亡风险是成绩较好者的两倍多。低SES增加了男孩的死亡风险(风险比:1.6,95%置信区间1.1 - 2.4),但对女孩没有影响。储备能力和学业成绩减弱了低SES对男孩死亡风险的影响。
青春期的高储备能力和良好学业成绩显著降低死亡风险。对男孩来说,这些因素还减轻了低SES对死亡率的负面影响。这些发现强调了青春期储备能力和学业成绩作为SES - 健康不平等中可能的因果或调节因素的作用。