Suppr超能文献

[显微内镜下椎间盘切除术与传统开放式椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效及安全性:一项Meta分析]

[Therapeutic effect and safety of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a Meta analysis].

作者信息

Ying Xiao-Ming, Jiang Yong-Liang, Xu Peng, Wang Peng, Zhu Bo, Guo Shao-Qing

机构信息

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310005, Zhejiang, China;

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310005, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Aug 25;29(8):744-751. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.08.014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a meta analysis of studies comparing theapeutic effect and safety of microendoscopic discectomy to conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation in China.

METHODS

A systematic literature retrieval was conducted in the Chinese Bio medicine Database, CNKI database, Chongqin VIP database and Wangfang database. The statistical analysis was performed using a RevMan 4.2 software. The comparison included excellent rate, operation times, blood loss, periods of bed rest and resuming daily activities, hospital stay or hospital stay after surgery, and complications of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy.

RESULTS

The search yielded 20 reports, which included 2 957 cases treated by microendoscopic discectomy and 2 130 cases treated by conventional open discectomy. There were 12, 11, 7, 5, 4 and 4 reports which had comparison of operation times, blood loss, period of bed rest, periods of resuming daily activities, hospital stay and hospital stay after surgery respectively. Complications were mentioned in 10 reports. Compared to patients treated by open discectomy, patients treated by microendoscopic discectomy had a higher excellent rates [OR=1.29, 95%CI (1.03, 1.62)], less blood loss[OR=-63.67, 95%CI (-86.78, -40.55)], less period of bed rest[OR=-15.33, 95%CI (-17.76, -12.90)], less period of resumption of daily activities [OR=-24.41, 95%CI (-36.86, -11.96)], less hospital stay [OR=-5.00, 95%CI (-6.94, -3.06)] or hospital stay after surgery [OR=-7.47, 95%CI (-9.17, -5.77) respectively. However, incidence of complications and operation times were proved no significant different between microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Microendoscopic discectomy and conventional open discectomy in treatment of lumbar disc herniation are both safe, effective; incidence of complications are nearly. Patients with lumbar disc herniation treated by microendoscopic discectomy have fewer blood loss, shorter periods of bed rest and hospital stay, and resume daily activities faster. Techniques are selected according to indications, microendoscopic discectomy should be carried out when conjunct indications occur.

摘要

目的

对比较中国微创椎间盘切除术与传统开放性椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效及安全性的研究进行荟萃分析。

方法

在中国生物医学数据库、CNKI数据库、重庆维普数据库和万方数据库中进行系统的文献检索。使用RevMan 4.2软件进行统计分析。比较内容包括微创椎间盘切除术与传统开放性椎间盘切除术的优良率、手术时间、失血量、卧床休息时间、恢复日常活动时间、住院时间或术后住院时间以及并发症。

结果

检索得到20篇报告,其中包括2957例行微创椎间盘切除术的病例和2130例行传统开放性椎间盘切除术的病例。分别有12篇、11篇、7篇、5篇、4篇和4篇报告对手术时间、失血量、卧床休息时间、恢复日常活动时间、住院时间和术后住院时间进行了比较。10篇报告提及了并发症。与接受开放性椎间盘切除术的患者相比,接受微创椎间盘切除术的患者优良率更高[OR = 1.29,95%CI(1.03, 1.62)],失血量更少[OR = -63.67,95%CI(-86.78, -40.55)],卧床休息时间更短[OR = -15.33,95%CI(-17.76, -12.90)],恢复日常活动时间更短[OR = -24.41,95%CI(-36.86, -11.96)],住院时间更短[OR = -5.00,95%CI(-6.94, -3.06)]或术后住院时间更短[OR = -7.47,95%CI(-9.17, -5.77)]。然而,微创椎间盘切除术与开放性椎间盘切除术之间的并发症发生率和手术时间经证实无显著差异。

结论

微创椎间盘切除术和传统开放性椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症均安全、有效;并发症发生率相近。接受微创椎间盘切除术治疗的腰椎间盘突出症患者失血量更少,卧床休息时间和住院时间更短,恢复日常活动更快。应根据适应证选择技术,出现联合适应证时应行微创椎间盘切除术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验