• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体在 2016 年路易斯安那州洪水中的灾害信息内容、可及性和传播。

Content, Accessibility, and Dissemination of Disaster Information via Social Media During the 2016 Louisiana Floods.

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Ms Scott and Dr Errett).

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jul/Aug;24(4):370-379. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000708.

DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000000708
PMID:29283953
Abstract

CONTEXT

Social media is becoming increasingly integrated into disaster response communication strategies of public health and emergency response agencies.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the content, accessibility, and dissemination of social media communications made by government agencies during a disaster response.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional analysis of social media posts made by federal, state, and local government, public health and emergency management agencies before, during, and after the 2016 Louisiana floods was conducted to determine their content, accessibility, and dissemination by level of government and time relative to disaster onset.

SETTING

Facebook and/or Twitter posts made by public agencies involved in the response to the 2016 Louisiana Flooding events (FEMA Disaster Declaration [DR-4277]) published between August 4 and September 16, 2016, publicly available online between February 21 and March 31, 2017, were included in the analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Content: The text of each post was assessed to determine whether it contained information on provision of situational awareness; addressing misconception, actionable requests; mental, behavioral, and emotional support; and/or recovery and rebuilding resources. Accessibility: A Flesh-Kincaid grade level of each post was calculated, and information on post language, originality, hyperlinks, visuals, videos, or hash tag was recorded. Dissemination: The average number of reacts/likes, shares/retweets, and comments per post was calculated.

RESULTS

Most posts contained information related to situational awareness and recovery resources. There was an increase in messages during the first week of the disaster at all levels. Few posts were made in languages other than English. Compared with state and federal posts, local Facebook posts averaged fewer reacts, comments, and shares throughout the analysis period.

CONCLUSIONS

Government agencies may maximize the use of social media platforms for disaster communications by establishing their social media network in advance of a disaster and by applying established guidelines on disaster social media use.

摘要

背景

社交媒体在公共卫生和应急响应机构的灾害应对通信策略中变得越来越重要。

目的

我们旨在评估政府机构在灾害应对期间发布的社交媒体通讯的内容、可访问性和传播情况。

设计

对联邦、州和地方政府、公共卫生和应急管理机构在 2016 年路易斯安那州洪水之前、期间和之后发布的社交媒体帖子进行了横断面分析,以确定其内容、可访问性以及按政府级别和相对于灾害发生的时间进行传播。

地点

包括 2016 年路易斯安那州洪水事件(FEMA 灾害声明 [DR-4277])期间公共机构发布的 Facebook 和/或 Twitter 帖子,这些帖子在 2016 年 8 月 4 日至 9 月 16 日期间发布,在 2017 年 2 月 21 日至 3 月 31 日期间在线公开,分析中包含这些帖子。

主要结果测量

内容:评估每个帖子的文本,以确定其是否包含有关提供态势感知、解决误解、可操作请求、心理、行为和情感支持以及/或恢复和重建资源的信息。可访问性:计算每个帖子的 Flesh-Kincaid 年级水平,并记录帖子语言、原创性、超链接、视觉效果、视频或哈希标记的信息。传播:计算每个帖子的平均点赞/喜欢、分享/转发和评论数。

结果

大多数帖子包含有关态势感知和恢复资源的信息。在灾害的第一周,所有级别都增加了信息。很少有帖子用英语以外的语言发布。与州和联邦帖子相比,地方 Facebook 帖子在整个分析期间的点赞、评论和分享平均数都较少。

结论

政府机构可以通过在灾害发生前建立社交媒体网络并应用有关灾害社交媒体使用的既定指南,最大限度地利用社交媒体平台进行灾害通信。

相似文献

1
Content, Accessibility, and Dissemination of Disaster Information via Social Media During the 2016 Louisiana Floods.社交媒体在 2016 年路易斯安那州洪水中的灾害信息内容、可及性和传播。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jul/Aug;24(4):370-379. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000708.
2
Use of social media and e-Government in disasters: 2016 Louisiana floods case study.社交媒体和电子政务在灾害中的应用:2016年路易斯安那洪水案例研究
J Emerg Manag. 2017 Nov/Dec;15(6):391-405. doi: 10.5055/jem.2017.0347.
3
Platform Effects on Public Health Communication: A Comparative and National Study of Message Design and Audience Engagement Across Twitter and Facebook.平台对公共卫生传播的影响:一项关于推特和脸书上信息设计与受众参与度的比较性全国研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Dec 20;2(2):e40198. doi: 10.2196/40198. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
4
Factors Engaging Users of Diabetes Social Media Channels on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram: Observational Study.社交媒体在糖尿病管理中的应用:基于 Facebook、Twitter 和 Instagram 的用户参与因素观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e21204. doi: 10.2196/21204.
5
Examining the Role of Twitter in Response and Recovery During and After Historic Flooding in South Carolina.审视推特在南卡罗来纳州历史性洪灾期间及灾后应对与恢复中的作用。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Sep/Oct;25(5):E6-E12. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000841.
6
EMS Criteria For Disaster Declaration灾害声明的紧急医疗服务标准
7
Analysis of twitter users' sharing of official new york storm response messages.推特用户对纽约官方风暴应对信息分享情况的分析。
Med 2 0. 2014 Mar 20;3(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/med20.3237. eCollection 2014 Jan-Jun.
8
Exploring Hospitals' Use of Facebook: Thematic Analysis.探索医院对脸书的使用:主题分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 16;20(5):e190. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9549.
9
Social Media Impact of the Food and Drug Administration's Drug Safety Communication Messaging About Zolpidem: Mixed-Methods Analysis.美国食品药品监督管理局关于唑吡坦的药品安全沟通信息的社交媒体影响:混合方法分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 Jan 5;4(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.7823.
10
Social Media Content of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Groups and Pages on Facebook: Cross-sectional Analysis.社交媒体中特发性肺纤维化群组和页面的内容:横断面分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 May 31;7(5):e24199. doi: 10.2196/24199.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilizing social media for community risk communication in megacities: analysing the impact of WeChat group information interaction and perception on communication satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in Shanghai.利用社交媒体进行特大城市社区风险沟通:分析在 COVID-19 大流行期间,微信群组信息互动和感知对上海沟通满意度的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 15;24(1):1889. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19276-1.
2
Reconnoitering NGOs strategies to strengthen disaster risk communication (DRC) in Pakistan: A conventional content analysis approach.探寻非政府组织加强巴基斯坦灾害风险沟通的策略:一种传统内容分析方法。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 4;9(7):e17928. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17928. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Lessons Learned from the 2019 Nebraska Floods: Implications for Emergency Management, Mass Care, and Food Security.
从 2019 年内布拉斯加州洪水中吸取的教训:对紧急管理、大规模救援和粮食安全的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;19(18):11345. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811345.
4
Social Media in Public Health: Strategies to Distill, Package, and Disseminate Public Health Research.社交媒体在公共卫生中的应用:提炼、包装和传播公共卫生研究的策略。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Sep/Oct;26(5):489-492. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001096.
5
Local Governments' Disaster Emergency Communication and Information Collection for Nutrition Assistance.地方政府的灾害应急通讯和营养援助信息收集。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 21;16(23):4617. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234617.