Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA.
Blood. 2018 Mar 22;131(12):1350-1359. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-09-806521. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
Early response to induction chemotherapy is an important prognostic factor in B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Here, we compare high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of and genes vs flow cytometry (FC) for measurable residual disease (MRD) detection at the end of induction chemotherapy in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed B-ALL. Six hundred nineteen paired pretreatment and end-of-induction bone marrow samples from Children's Oncology Group studies AALL0331 (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT00103285) (standard risk [SR]; with MRD by FC at any level) and AALL0232 (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT00075725) (high risk; with day 29 MRD <0.1% by FC) were evaluated by HTS and FC for event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS). HTS and FC showed similar 5-year EFS and OS for MRD-positive and -negative patients using an MRD threshold of 0.01%. However, there was a high discordant rate with HTS identifying 55 (38.7%) more patients MRD positive at this threshold. These discrepant patients have worse outcomes than FC MRD-negative patients. In addition, the increased analytic sensitivity of HTS permitted identification of 19.9% of SR patients without MRD at any detectable level who had excellent 5-year EFS (98.1%) and OS (100%). The higher analytic sensitivity and lower false-negative rate of HTS improves upon FC for MRD detection in pediatric B-ALL by identifying a novel subset of patients at end of induction who are essentially cured using current chemotherapy and identifying MRD at 0.01% in up to one-third of patients who are missed at the same threshold by FC.
早期诱导化疗反应是 B 淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)的重要预后因素。在这里,我们比较了高通量测序(HTS)和流式细胞术(FC)在儿童新诊断 B-ALL 患者诱导化疗结束时检测微小残留病(MRD)的能力。619 对来自儿童肿瘤组研究 AALL0331(clinicaltrials.gov #NCT00103285)(标准风险[SR];FC 任何水平的 MRD)和 AALL0232(clinicaltrials.gov #NCT00075725)(高风险;FC 第 29 天的 MRD<0.1%)的预处理和诱导结束骨髓样本进行了 HTS 和 FC 评估,以评估无事件生存(EFS)和总生存(OS)。HTS 和 FC 显示,对于使用 0.01%MRD 阈值的 MRD 阳性和阴性患者,5 年 EFS 和 OS 相似。然而,HTS 识别出 55 例(38.7%)更多的患者在该阈值处 MRD 阳性,这存在较高的不一致率。这些不一致的患者比 FC MRD 阴性患者的预后更差。此外,HTS 的分析灵敏度提高可以识别出 19.9%的 SR 患者在任何可检测水平均无 MRD,这些患者的 5 年 EFS(98.1%)和 OS(100%)非常好。HTS 的更高分析灵敏度和更低假阴性率提高了 FC 在儿科 B-ALL 中对 MRD 的检测能力,通过在诱导结束时识别出一个新的亚组患者,这些患者在使用当前化疗治疗后基本上被治愈,并在多达三分之一的患者中检测到 0.01%的 MRD,而 FC 在相同的阈值下漏检。