Suppr超能文献

静脉注射聚乙二醇化门冬酰胺酶与新诊断的儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(DFCI 05-001)中的肌内天然大肠杆菌 L-门冬酰胺酶的比较:一项随机、开放标签的 3 期试验。

Intravenous pegylated asparaginase versus intramuscular native Escherichia coli L-asparaginase in newly diagnosed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (DFCI 05-001): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1677-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00363-0. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

l-asparaginase is a universal component of treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and is usually administered intramuscularly. Pegylated Escherichia coli asparaginase (PEG-asparaginase) has a longer half-life and is potentially less immunogenic than the native Escherichia coli (E coli) preparation, and can be more feasibly administered intravenously. The aim of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Consortium Protocol 05-001 (DFCI 05-001) was to compare the relative toxicity and efficacy of intravenous PEG-asparaginase and intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

METHODS

DFCI 05-001 enrolled patients aged 1-18 years with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia from 11 consortium sites in the USA and Canada. Patients were assigned to an initial risk group on the basis of their baseline characteristics and then underwent 32 days of induction therapy. Those who achieved complete remission after induction therapy were assigned to a final risk group and were eligible to participate in a randomised comparison of intravenous PEG-asparaginase (15 doses of 2500 IU/m(2) every 2 weeks) or intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase (30 doses of 25 000 IU/m(2) weekly), beginning at week 7 after study entry. Randomisation (1:1) was unmasked, and was done by a statistician-generated allocation sequence using a permuted blocks algorithm (block size of 4), stratified by final risk group. The primary endpoint of the randomised comparison was the overall frequency of asparaginase-related toxicities (defined as allergy, pancreatitis, and thrombotic or bleeding complications). Predefined secondary endpoints were disease-free survival, serum asparaginase activity, and quality of life during therapy as assessed by PedsQL surveys. All analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00400946.

FINDINGS

Between April 22, 2005, and Feb 12, 2010, 551 eligible patients were enrolled. 526 patients achieved complete remission after induction, of whom 463 were randomly assigned to receive intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase (n=231) or intravenous PEG-asparaginase (n=232). The two treatment groups did not differ significantly in the overall frequency of asparaginase-related toxicities (65 [28%] of 232 patients in the intravenous PEG-asparaginase group vs 59 [26%] of 231 patients in the intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase group, p=0·60), or in the individual frequency of allergy (p=0·36), pancreatitis (p=0·55), or thrombotic or bleeding complications (p=0·26). Median follow-up was 6·0 years (IQR 5·0-7·1). 5-year disease-free survival was 90% (95% CI 86-94) for patients assigned to intravenous PEG-asparaginase and 89% (85-93) for those assigned to intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase (p=0·58). The median nadir serum asparaginase activity was significantly higher in patients who received intravenous PEG-asparaginase than in those who received intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase. Significantly more anxiety was reported by both patients and parent-proxy in the intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase group than in the intravenous PEG-asparaginase group. Scores for other domains were similar between the groups. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were bacterial or fungal infections (47 [20%] of 232 in the intravenous PEG-asparaginase group vs 51 [22%] of 231 patients in the intramuscular E colil-asparaginase group) and asparaginase-related allergic reactions (14 [6%] vs 6 [3%]).

INTERPRETATION

Intravenous PEG-asparaginase was not more toxic than, was similarly efficacious to, and was associated with decreased anxiety compared with intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase, supporting its use as the front-line asparaginase preparation in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute and Enzon Pharmaceuticals.

摘要

背景

天冬酰胺酶是治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的通用药物,通常采用肌内注射的方式给药。聚乙二醇化大肠杆菌天冬酰胺酶(PEG-天冬酰胺酶)半衰期较长,免疫原性较天然大肠杆菌(E coli)制剂低,并且更便于静脉给药。Dana-Farber 癌症研究所急性淋巴细胞白血病联盟方案 05-001(DFCI 05-001)旨在比较新诊断的急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿静脉内 PEG-天冬酰胺酶和肌内天然 E coli 天冬酰胺酶的相对毒性和疗效。

方法

DFCI 05-001 纳入了来自美国和加拿大 11 个联盟站点的 1-18 岁新诊断为急性淋巴细胞白血病的患者。根据基线特征将患者分配到初始风险组,然后进行 32 天的诱导治疗。诱导治疗后达到完全缓解的患者被分配到最终风险组,并有资格参加静脉内 PEG-天冬酰胺酶(15 剂,每 2 周 2500 IU/m²)与肌内天然 E coli 天冬酰胺酶(30 剂,每周 25000 IU/m²)的随机比较,起始时间为研究入组后第 7 周。随机分组(1:1)采用了无掩蔽、由统计学家生成的分配序列,使用置换块算法(块大小为 4),按最终风险组分层。随机比较的主要终点是天冬酰胺酶相关毒性的总体频率(定义为过敏、胰腺炎和血栓或出血并发症)。预设的次要终点是无病生存、血清天冬酰胺酶活性和治疗期间的生活质量,通过 PedsQL 调查评估。所有分析均采用意向治疗。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00400946。

结果

2005 年 4 月 22 日至 2010 年 2 月 12 日期间,共纳入 551 名合格患者。526 名患者在诱导治疗后达到完全缓解,其中 463 名被随机分配接受肌内天然 E coli 天冬酰胺酶(n=231)或静脉内 PEG-天冬酰胺酶(n=232)治疗。两组天冬酰胺酶相关毒性的总体频率无显著差异(静脉内 PEG-天冬酰胺酶组 232 例患者中有 65 例[28%],肌内天然 E coli 天冬酰胺酶组 231 例患者中有 59 例[26%],p=0.60),过敏(p=0.36)、胰腺炎(p=0.55)或血栓或出血并发症(p=0.26)的发生率也无显著差异。中位随访时间为 6.0 年(IQR 5.0-7.1)。接受静脉内 PEG-天冬酰胺酶治疗的患者 5 年无病生存率为 90%(95%CI 86-94),接受肌内天然 E coli 天冬酰胺酶治疗的患者为 89%(85-93)(p=0.58)。接受静脉内 PEG-天冬酰胺酶治疗的患者血清天冬酰胺酶活性的中位数最低值显著高于接受肌内天然 E coli 天冬酰胺酶治疗的患者。与静脉内 PEG-天冬酰胺酶组相比,肌内天然 E coli 天冬酰胺酶组患者和家长代理报告的焦虑评分显著更高。两组其他各域的评分相似。最常见的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件是细菌或真菌感染(静脉内 PEG-天冬酰胺酶组 232 例患者中有 47 例[20%],肌内天然 E coli 天冬酰胺酶组 231 例患者中有 51 例[22%])和天冬酰胺酶相关过敏反应(静脉内 PEG-天冬酰胺酶组 14 例[6%],肌内天然 E coli 天冬酰胺酶组 6 例[3%])。

结论

与肌内天然 E coli 天冬酰胺酶相比,静脉内 PEG-天冬酰胺酶毒性不更大,疗效相当,且与焦虑程度降低相关,支持将其作为新诊断的急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿的一线天冬酰胺酶制剂。

资金来源

美国国立癌症研究所和 Enzon 制药公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验