"Behavior and Basal Ganglia" Research Unit (EA 4712), University of Rennes 1, Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard, 35000, Rennes, France.
Department of Neurology, Rennes University Hospital, rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes, France.
J Neurol. 2018 Mar;265(3):471-477. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8721-7. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) is increasingly used in Parkinson's disease (PD), notably in patients contraindicated for subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Although it has been suggested that CSAI is safe regarding cognition, few studies have actually investigated its effect, especially on cognitive control which is a crucial process for goal-directed behavior. More specifically, its impact on the dynamics of cognitive action control, as reflected by the activation and suppression of impulsive responses, has yet to be investigated, which is the objective of the present study.
We compared cognitive action control between baseline (M0) and 6 months (M6) after the start of add-on CSAI by administering an oculomotor Simon task to 20 patients with mild to moderate PD. We used the activation-suppression model to determine whether CSAI had an effect on either the impulsive errors made in conflict situations or the suppression of these responses.
We found no difference between M0 and M6 in the congruence effect regarding either reaction time or accuracy, indicating that overall conflict resolution was not influenced by CSAI. Furthermore, the rate of fast errors in the conflict situation and the last slope of the delta plots (reflecting the strength of impulsive response suppression) were unaffected by the treatment. The 95% confidence intervals calculated for the treatment effect on both of these measures fell below the range of usual meaningful effects.
We found no difference between M0 and M6, which strongly suggests that CSAI does not impair the dynamics of cognitive action control.
持续皮下给予阿朴吗啡输注(CSAI)在帕金森病(PD)中的应用越来越多,尤其是在那些对丘脑底核深部脑刺激禁忌的患者中。尽管已经有人提出 CSAI 在认知方面是安全的,但实际上很少有研究真正调查过它的效果,尤其是对认知控制的影响,认知控制是一种对目标导向行为至关重要的过程。更具体地说,其对冲动反应的激活和抑制反映的认知动作控制动态的影响尚未被研究,这是本研究的目的。
我们通过对 20 名轻度至中度 PD 患者进行眼动西蒙任务,比较了 CSAI 起始后 6 个月(M6)与基线(M0)时的认知动作控制。我们使用激活-抑制模型来确定 CSAI 是否对冲突情况下的冲动错误或这些反应的抑制有影响。
我们没有发现 M0 和 M6 之间在反应时或准确性方面的一致性效应有差异,这表明总体冲突解决不受 CSAI 的影响。此外,冲突情况下快速错误的比率和 delta 图的最后斜率(反映冲动反应抑制的强度)不受治疗的影响。这两个指标的治疗效果的 95%置信区间计算值都低于通常有意义的效果范围。
我们没有发现 M0 和 M6 之间的差异,这强烈表明 CSAI 不会损害认知动作控制的动态。