Papanagnou Dimitrios, Linder Kathryn, Shah Anuj, London Kory Scott, Chandra Shruti, Naples Robin
Department of Emergency Medicine at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Dec 27;8:439-445. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5a2e.a8b4.
To define the emotional intelligence (EI) profile of emergency medicine (EM) residents, and identify resident EI strengths and weaknesses.
First-, second-, and third-year residents (post-graduate years [PGY] 1, 2, and 3, respectively) of Thomas Jefferson University Hospital's EM Program completed the Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i 2.0), a validated instrument offered by Multi-Health Systems. Reported scores included total mean EI, 5 composite scores, and 15 subscales of EI. Scores are reported as means with 95% CIs. The unpaired, two-sample t-test was used to evaluate differences in means.
Thirty-five residents completed the assessment (response rate 97.2%). Scores were normed to the general population (mean 100, SD 15). Total mean EI for the cohort was 103 (95%CI,100-108). EI was higher in female (107) than male (101) residents. PGY-2s demonstrated the lowest mean EI (95) versus PGY-1s (104) and PGY-3s (110). The difference in PGY-3 EI (110; 95%CI,103-116) and PGY-1 EI (95, 95%CI,87-104) was statistically significant (unpaired t-test, p<0.01). Highest composite scores were in interpersonal skills (107; 95%CI,100-108) and stress management (105; 95%CI,101-109). Subscale cohort strengths included self-actualization (107); empathy (107); interpersonal relationships (106); impulse control (106); and stress tolerance (106). Lowest subscale score was in assertiveness (98). Self-regard (89), assertiveness (88), and independence (90) were areas in which PGY-2s attained relatively lower scores (unpaired t-test, p<0.05) compared to their peers and the general population. PGY-3's scored highest in nearly all subscales.
The EQ-i offers insight into training that may assist in developing EM residents, specifically in self-regard, assertiveness, and self-expression. Further study is required to ascertain if patterns in level of training are idiosyncratic or relate to the natural maturation of residents.
确定急诊医学(EM)住院医师的情商(EI)概况,并识别住院医师EI的优势和劣势。
托马斯·杰斐逊大学医院EM项目的一年级、二年级和三年级住院医师(分别为研究生第1年、第2年和第3年)完成了由Multi-Health Systems提供的经过验证的工具《情商问卷(EQ-i 2.0)》。报告的分数包括总平均EI、5个综合分数和15个EI子量表。分数报告为带有95%置信区间(CI)的均值。采用非配对双样本t检验来评估均值差异。
35名住院医师完成了评估(回复率97.2%)。分数根据一般人群进行了标准化(均值100,标准差15)。该队列的总平均EI为103(95%CI,100 - 108)。女性住院医师(107)的EI高于男性住院医师(101)。研究生第2年住院医师的平均EI最低(95),而研究生第1年住院医师为(104),研究生第3年住院医师为(110)。研究生第3年住院医师的EI(110;95%CI,103 - 116)与研究生第1年住院医师的EI(95,95%CI,87 - 104)之间的差异具有统计学意义(非配对t检验,p<0.01)。最高的综合分数出现在人际交往能力(107;95%CI,100 - 108)和压力管理(105;95%CI,101 - 109)方面。子量表队列优势包括自我实现(107);同理心(107);人际关系(106);冲动控制(106);以及压力承受能力(106)。最低的子量表分数出现在自信方面(98)。自尊(89)、自信(88)和独立性(90)是研究生第2年住院医师相对于同龄人及一般人群得分相对较低的领域(非配对t检验,p<0.05)。研究生第3年住院医师在几乎所有子量表中得分最高。
EQ-i为有助于培养急诊医学住院医师的培训提供了见解,特别是在自尊、自信和自我表达方面。需要进一步研究以确定培训水平的模式是特异的还是与住院医师的自然成熟有关。