• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期绝育手术后的长期结局——一项比较性回顾性队列研究,研究对象为医疗补助计划患者。

Long-term outcomes after elective sterilization procedures - a comparative retrospective cohort study of Medicaid patients.

机构信息

FPA Women's Health, Medical Director, 2777 Long Beach Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90806.

Bayer U.S. LLC., 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ 07981.

出版信息

Contraception. 2018 May;97(5):428-433. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.015
PMID:29288653
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to compare the long-term outcomes, including hysterectomy, chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), in women post hysteroscopic sterilization (HS) and laparoscopic tubal ligation (TL) in the Medicaid population.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational cohort analysis using data from the US Medicaid Analytic Extracts Encounters database. Women aged 18 to 49years with at least one claim for HS (n=3929) or TL (n=10,875) between July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2010, were included. Main outcome measures were hysterectomy, CPP or AUB in the 24months poststerilization. Propensity score matching was used to control for patient demographics and baseline characteristics. Logistic regression analysis investigated the variables associated with a 24-month rate of each outcome in the HS versus laparoscopic TL cohorts.

RESULTS

Postmatching analyses were performed at 6, 12 and 24months post index procedure. At 24months, hysterectomy was more common in the laparoscopic TL than the HS group (3.5% vs. 2.1%; p=.0023), as was diagnosis of CPP (26.8% vs. 23.5%; p=.0050). No significant differences in AUB diagnoses were observed. Logistic regression identified HS as being associated with lower risk of hysterectomy (odds ratio [OR] 0.77 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.60-0.97]; p=.0274) and lower risk of CPP diagnosis (OR 0.91 [95% CI 0.83-0.99]; p=.0336) at 24months poststerilization.

CONCLUSION

In Medicaid patients, HS is associated with a significantly lower risk of hysterectomy or CPP diagnosis 24months poststerilization versus laparoscopic TL. Incidence of AUB poststerilization is not significantly different. While some differences in outcomes were statistically significant, the effect sizes were small, and the conclusion is one of equivalence and not clinical superiority.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

This propensity score matching analysis confirms that pelvic pain and AUB are common in women before and after sterilization regardless of whether the procedure is performed hysteroscopically or laparoscopically. Moreover, HS is associated with a significantly lower risk of hysterectomy or a CPP diagnosis in the 24months poststerilization when compared to TL.

摘要

目的

比较接受宫腔镜绝育(HS)和腹腔镜输卵管结扎(TL)的女性在 Medicaid 人群中的长期结局,包括子宫切除术、慢性盆腔痛(CPP)和异常子宫出血(AUB)。

研究设计

这是一项使用美国 Medicaid 分析提取记录数据库数据的回顾性观察队列分析。2009 年 7 月 1 日至 2010 年 12 月 31 日期间,年龄在 18 至 49 岁之间、至少有一次 HS(n=3929)或 TL(n=10875)索赔的女性被纳入研究。主要结局指标是绝育后 24 个月内的子宫切除术、CPP 或 AUB。采用倾向评分匹配来控制患者人口统计学和基线特征。逻辑回归分析调查了与 HS 与腹腔镜 TL 队列 24 个月内每种结局发生率相关的变量。

结果

在指数手术后 6、12 和 24 个月进行了匹配后分析。在 24 个月时,TL 组的子宫切除术发生率高于 HS 组(3.5%比 2.1%;p=.0023),CPP 诊断率也高于 HS 组(26.8%比 23.5%;p=.0050)。AUB 诊断率无显著差异。逻辑回归确定 HS 与子宫切除术风险降低相关(优势比[OR]0.77[95%置信区间{CI}0.60-0.97];p=.0274)和 CPP 诊断风险降低相关(OR 0.91[95% CI 0.83-0.99];p=.0336)。

结论

在 Medicaid 患者中,HS 与绝育后 24 个月内子宫切除术或 CPP 诊断风险显著降低相关,而绝育后 AUB 的发生率无显著差异。尽管一些结局的差异具有统计学意义,但效应大小较小,结论是等效的,而不是临床优越性。

意义陈述

这项倾向评分匹配分析证实,无论手术是经宫腔镜还是腹腔镜进行,盆腔痛和 AUB 在绝育前和绝育后都是常见的。此外,与 TL 相比,HS 与绝育后 24 个月内子宫切除术或 CPP 诊断风险显著降低相关。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes after elective sterilization procedures - a comparative retrospective cohort study of Medicaid patients.择期绝育手术后的长期结局——一项比较性回顾性队列研究,研究对象为医疗补助计划患者。
Contraception. 2018 May;97(5):428-433. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
2
Occurrence of Chronic Pelvic Pain, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, and Hysterectomy Post-procedure among Women Who Have Undergone Female Sterilization Procedures: A Retrospective Claims Analysis of Commercially Insured Women in the US.美国商业保险女性中接受女性绝育手术者的慢性盆腔痛、异常子宫出血和术后子宫切除术的发生情况:一项回顾性理赔分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 May-Jun;25(4):651-660. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.029. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
3
4
Comparative effectiveness of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization for women: a retrospective cohort study.宫腔镜与腹腔镜绝育术对女性的比较疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Jun;117(6):1322-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
5
Incidence of opioid-managed pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization versus laparoscopic sterilization, US 2005-2012.2005 - 2012年美国宫腔镜绝育术与腹腔镜绝育术后阿片类药物治疗盆腔疼痛的发生率
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):875-84. doi: 10.1002/pds.3766. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
6
Comparison of Healthcare Costs Among Commercially Insured Women in the United States Who Underwent Hysteroscopic Sterilization Versus Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation Sterilization.美国商业保险女性中接受宫腔镜绝育术与腹腔镜双侧输卵管结扎绝育术的医疗费用比较。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 May;26(5):483-490. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6035. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
7
Patient-Centered Safety Outcomes After Hysteroscopic Compared With Laparoscopic Sterilization.宫腔镜与腹腔镜绝育术后以患者为中心的安全结局比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar 1;139(3):423-432. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004690.
8
Gynecologic Outcomes After Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Sterilization Procedures.宫腔镜和腹腔镜绝育术后的妇科结局
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):843-852. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001615.
9
Seven-Year Outcomes After Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Sterilizations.宫腔镜和腹腔镜绝育术后 7 年的结果。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):323-331. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003092.
10
The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization.宫腔镜绝育术与腹腔镜绝育术相比的可行性、安全性及有效性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):570.e1-570.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world data and evidence in pain research: a qualitative systematic review of methods in current practice.疼痛研究中的真实世界数据与证据:对当前实践中方法的定性系统评价
Pain Rep. 2023 Feb 1;8(2):e1057. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001057. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
2
Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review.高资源国家中寻求永久避孕的女性的选择比较:一项系统综述
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 20;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01201-z.