• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2005 - 2012年美国宫腔镜绝育术与腹腔镜绝育术后阿片类药物治疗盆腔疼痛的发生率

Incidence of opioid-managed pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization versus laparoscopic sterilization, US 2005-2012.

作者信息

Conover Mitchell M, Howell Jennifer O, Wu Jennifer M, Kinlaw Alan C, Dasgupta Nabarun, Jonsson Funk Michele

机构信息

Center for Women's Health Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 104B Market Street, Chapel Hill, NC, 27704, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):875-84. doi: 10.1002/pds.3766. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1002/pds.3766
PMID:25832014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4527877/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Compare incidence of opioid-managed pelvic pain within 12 months after hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization.

METHODS

Using administrative claims, we identified women aged 18-49 years without recent history of childbirth who underwent hysteroscopic or laparoscopic sterilization between 2005 and 2012. We defined the outcome as ≥2 diagnoses for pelvic pain and ≥2 prescription fills for opioids. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) using Cox models and propensity score methods (matching and inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighting [IPTW]).

RESULTS

We identified 71,875 eligible women (hysteroscopic n = 26,927 [37.5%], laparoscopic n = 44,948 [62.5%]). Of those, 236 (0.88%) hysteroscopic patients and 420 (0.93%) laparoscopic patients experienced the outcome (crude HR = 0.97, 95%CI: [0.83, 1.14]). Adjusted analyses also yielded near-null results (matched HR = 1.08, 95%CI [0.90, 1.31]; IPTW HR = 0.97, 95%CI [0.80, 1.18]). While most sensitivity analyses generated results close to the null, hazard ratios estimated using propensity score matching ranged from 0.65 to 1.53.

CONCLUSIONS

Among women without recent history of childbirth, we did not find compelling evidence of a clinically meaningful increase in the incidence of pelvic pain requiring opioids during the year after hysteroscopic sterilization. However, effects observed in sensitivity analyses may merit further investigation.

摘要

目的

比较宫腔镜绝育术和腹腔镜绝育术后12个月内阿片类药物治疗盆腔疼痛的发生率。

方法

利用行政索赔数据,我们确定了年龄在18 - 49岁之间、近期无分娩史且在2005年至2012年间接受宫腔镜或腹腔镜绝育术的女性。我们将结局定义为盆腔疼痛诊断≥2次且阿片类药物处方≥2次。我们使用Cox模型和倾向评分方法(匹配和逆概率治疗加权法[IPTW])计算调整后的风险比(HR)。

结果

我们确定了7l,875名符合条件的女性(宫腔镜组n = 26,927 [37.5%],腹腔镜组n = 44,948 [62.5%])。其中,236名(0.88%)宫腔镜手术患者和420名(0.93%)腹腔镜手术患者出现了该结局(粗HR = 0.97, 95%CI: [0.83, 1.14])。调整分析也得出了接近无效的结果(匹配HR = 1.08, 95%CI [0.90, 1.31];IPTW HR = 0.97, 95%CI [0.80, 1.18])。虽然大多数敏感性分析得出的结果接近无效,但使用倾向评分匹配估计的风险比范围为0.65至1.53。

结论

在近期无分娩史的女性中,我们没有发现令人信服的证据表明宫腔镜绝育术后一年内需要使用阿片类药物治疗的盆腔疼痛发生率有临床意义的增加。然而,敏感性分析中观察到的影响可能值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Incidence of opioid-managed pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization versus laparoscopic sterilization, US 2005-2012.2005 - 2012年美国宫腔镜绝育术与腹腔镜绝育术后阿片类药物治疗盆腔疼痛的发生率
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):875-84. doi: 10.1002/pds.3766. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
2
Gynecologic Outcomes After Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Sterilization Procedures.宫腔镜和腹腔镜绝育术后的妇科结局
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):843-852. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001615.
3
Association of Hysteroscopic vs Laparoscopic Sterilization With Procedural, Gynecological, and Medical Outcomes.宫腔镜绝育术与腹腔镜绝育术与手术、妇科及医疗结局的相关性
JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):375-387. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21269.
4
Incidence and risk factors for chronic pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization.宫腔镜绝育术后慢性盆腔疼痛的发生率及危险因素
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(3):390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
5
Long-term outcomes after elective sterilization procedures - a comparative retrospective cohort study of Medicaid patients.择期绝育手术后的长期结局——一项比较性回顾性队列研究,研究对象为医疗补助计划患者。
Contraception. 2018 May;97(5):428-433. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
6
Seven-Year Outcomes After Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Sterilizations.宫腔镜和腹腔镜绝育术后 7 年的结果。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):323-331. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003092.
7
Patient-Centered Safety Outcomes After Hysteroscopic Compared With Laparoscopic Sterilization.宫腔镜与腹腔镜绝育术后以患者为中心的安全结局比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar 1;139(3):423-432. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004690.
8
Comparative effectiveness of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization for women: a retrospective cohort study.宫腔镜与腹腔镜绝育术对女性的比较疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Jun;117(6):1322-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
9
Probability of pregnancy after sterilization: a comparison of hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization.绝育术后妊娠概率:宫腔镜绝育术与腹腔镜绝育术的比较
Contraception. 2014 Aug;90(2):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
10
Occurrence of Chronic Pelvic Pain, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, and Hysterectomy Post-procedure among Women Who Have Undergone Female Sterilization Procedures: A Retrospective Claims Analysis of Commercially Insured Women in the US.美国商业保险女性中接受女性绝育手术者的慢性盆腔痛、异常子宫出血和术后子宫切除术的发生情况:一项回顾性理赔分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 May-Jun;25(4):651-660. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.029. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review.高资源国家中寻求永久避孕的女性的选择比较:一项系统综述
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 20;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01201-z.
2
Essure Surgical Removal and Subsequent Resolution of Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.输卵管介入栓塞术取出后慢性盆腔疼痛的缓解:一例病例报告及文献综述
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2016;2016:6961202. doi: 10.1155/2016/6961202. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
3
Increasing Patient Engagement in Pharmacovigilance Through Online Community Outreach and Mobile Reporting Applications: An Analysis of Adverse Event Reporting for the Essure Device in the US.通过在线社区推广和移动报告应用程序提高患者在药物警戒中的参与度:美国爱舒爽装置不良事件报告分析
Pharmaceut Med. 2015;29(6):331-340. doi: 10.1007/s40290-015-0106-6. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimation using all available covariate information versus a fixed look-back window for dichotomous covariates.使用所有可用协变量信息进行估计与使用固定回溯窗口进行二分类协变量的估计。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 May;22(5):542-50. doi: 10.1002/pds.3434. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
2
Complications of hysteroscopic Essure(®) sterilisation: report on 4306 procedures performed in a single centre.宫腔镜下 Essure(®)绝育术的并发症:单中心 4306 例手术报告。
BJOG. 2012 Jun;119(7):795-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03292.x. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
3
Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients.Essure 节育器放置失败的预测因素:495 例前瞻性、多中心研究。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jan;93(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.063. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
4
Tubal perforation by Essure: three different clinical presentations.爱舒柔节育器导致的输卵管穿孔:三种不同的临床表现。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Nov;90(5):2011.e5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.020. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
5
Variations in stress incontinence and prolapse management by surgeon specialty.不同外科专业在压力性尿失禁和盆腔器官脱垂治疗方面的差异。
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.149. Epub 2007 Aug 16.
6
Pain associated with hysteroscopic sterilization.与宫腔镜绝育相关的疼痛。
JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):63-5.
7
Bilateral cornual abscess after endometrial ablation following Essure sterilization.依思珠绝育术后子宫内膜切除术后双侧宫角脓肿
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):509-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.03.003.
8
The role of provider volume on outcomes after sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence.提供者手术量对压力性尿失禁吊带手术后结局的作用。
J Urol. 2007 Apr;177(4):1457-62; discussion 1462. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.034.
9
Insights into different results from different causal contrasts in the presence of effect-measure modification.在存在效应测量修正的情况下,对不同因果对比产生的不同结果的洞察。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Oct;15(10):698-709. doi: 10.1002/pds.1231.
10
Female sterilisation: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisation.女性绝育术:ESSURE与腹腔镜绝育术的队列对照比较研究。
BJOG. 2005 Nov;112(11):1522-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00726.x.