• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植牙植入时侧方和牙槽嵴窦提升技术的分口设计比较:简短通讯

A Split-Mouth Design Comparison for Lateral and Crestal Sinus Lift Techniques with Dental Implants Placements: Short Communication.

作者信息

Al-Almaie Saad, Kavarodi Abdul Majeed, Alorf Ali, Alzahrani Saeed

机构信息

Medical Administration, King Fahd Military Medical Complex, Dhahran 31932, KSA.

Department of Dental Surgery, King Fahd Military Medical Complex, Dhahran 31932, KSA.

出版信息

Open Dent J. 2017 Nov 30;11:603-608. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010603. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2174/1874210601711010603
PMID:29290838
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5738746/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of implant placement and patient appraisal for two sinus lift techniques using both crestal and lateral techniques for bilateral sinus left in a split-mouth design.

INTRODUCTION

All implants were successfully osseointegrated without any clinical complications or peri-implant radiolucency during the follow-up period of maximum 3 years.

METHODS

In terms of outcomes postoperative vertigo showed to be a major concern with the crestal approach, this approach is preferred over the lateral technique because of the reduced time required for the procedure and because it is less invasive.

RESULTS

Most patients preferred the crestal approach over the lateral approach due to the delay in implant placement.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是采用分口设计,比较和评估使用嵴顶和外侧两种技术对双侧上颌窦进行提升时种植体植入的效果以及患者评价。

引言

在最长3年的随访期内,所有种植体均成功实现骨整合,无任何临床并发症或种植体周围透射区。

方法

在术后眩晕方面,嵴顶入路是一个主要问题,由于该手术所需时间较短且侵入性较小,因此该入路比外侧技术更受青睐。

结果

由于种植体植入延迟,大多数患者更喜欢嵴顶入路而非外侧入路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb0/5738746/f50caba3f6b6/TODENTJ-11-603_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb0/5738746/39cdc3a7dc1b/TODENTJ-11-603_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb0/5738746/10c84b4be0af/TODENTJ-11-603_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb0/5738746/f50caba3f6b6/TODENTJ-11-603_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb0/5738746/39cdc3a7dc1b/TODENTJ-11-603_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb0/5738746/10c84b4be0af/TODENTJ-11-603_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb0/5738746/f50caba3f6b6/TODENTJ-11-603_F3.jpg

相似文献

1
A Split-Mouth Design Comparison for Lateral and Crestal Sinus Lift Techniques with Dental Implants Placements: Short Communication.种植牙植入时侧方和牙槽嵴窦提升技术的分口设计比较:简短通讯
Open Dent J. 2017 Nov 30;11:603-608. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010603. eCollection 2017.
2
Cosci versus Summers technique for crestal sinus lift: 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.用于牙槽嵴顶窦底提升的科斯奇技术与萨默斯技术:一项随机对照试验的3年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Summer;7(2):129-37.
3
Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: a randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference.用于种植体修复的牙槽嵴窦底提升术:一项比较Cosci技术和Summers技术的随机临床试验。关于并发症和患者偏好的初步报告。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Autumn;3(3):221-32.
4
Minimally Invasive Crestal Sinus Lift Technique and Simultaneous Implant Placement.微创牙槽嵴顶窦底提升技术及同期种植体植入
Chin J Dent Res. 2017;20(4):211-218. doi: 10.3290/j.cjdr.a39220.
5
Early loading of implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and Bio-Oss versus crestal mini sinus lift and 8-mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A randomised controlled clinical trial.萎缩性上颌后牙区种植体的早期加载:自体骨联合Bio-Oss行外侧上颌窦提升术与嵴顶微创上颌窦提升术及8毫米羟基磷灰石涂层种植体的比较。一项随机对照临床试验。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Spring;2(1):25-38.
6
Early implant loading in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-stage lateral versus crestal sinus lift and 8 mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A 5-year randomised controlled trial.萎缩性上颌后牙区的早期种植体加载:一期侧壁开窗与嵴顶窦底提升联合8mm羟基磷灰石涂层种植体。一项5年随机对照试验。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Spring;6(1):13-25.
7
Insufficient evidence for sinus lifts over short implants for dental implant rehabilitation.在牙种植修复中,关于上颌窦提升术对比短种植体的证据不足。
Evid Based Dent. 2015 Mar;16(1):21-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401081.
8
Minimally invasive flap compared to a trapezoidal flap in lateral approach maxillary sinus elevation procedures: Four-month post-loading results from a split-mouth randomised controlled trial.微创瓣与梯形瓣在外侧入路上颌窦提升术中的比较:一项随机对照分口研究的加载后 4 个月的结果。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019;12(2):209-224.
9
Extra-Short Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation: A Prospective Clinical Study.骨凿上颌窦底提升并用超短种植体:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):415-422. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7950.
10
Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.上颌窦提升术对骨内种植体存留率的影响。一项系统评价。
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43. doi: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328.

引用本文的文献

1
Crestal approach for maxillary sinus augmentation in individuals with limited alveolar bone height: An observational study.牙槽骨高度不足的上颌窦提升术的牙嵴顶入路:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 25;103(43):e40331. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040331.
2
Peri-implant tissue conditions following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: 3-year results of a bi-center, randomized trial.经牙槽嵴顶和上颌窦侧壁提升术后种植体周围组织状况:一项双中心、随机试验的 3 年结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 May;26(5):3975-3986. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04364-y. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
3
Patient-reported outcomes and complication rates after lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation: a prospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Immediate Dental Implant Placements Using Osteotome Technique: A Case Report and Literature Review.使用骨凿技术即刻植入牙种植体:病例报告与文献综述
Open Dent J. 2016 Jul 29;10:367-74. doi: 10.2174/1874210616021001367. eCollection 2016.
2
Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.在儿童口腔保健中比较计算机化Quicksleeper系统提供的骨内麻醉与传统浸润麻醉疼痛的分口和双臂试验:一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 10;5(7):e007724. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007724.
3
患者报告的上颌窦侧壁提升术后结局和并发症发生率:一项前瞻性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jul;25(7):4431-4444. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03755-x. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
Effect of implant design in immediate loading. A randomized, controlled, split-mouth, prospective clinical trial.
种植体设计在即刻负重中的效果。一项随机、对照、双侧对照、前瞻性临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):240-4. doi: 10.1111/clr.12506. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
4
Staged osteotome sinus floor elevation for progressive site development and immediate implant placement in severely resorbed alveolar bone: a case report.分期骨凿上颌窦底提升术用于严重吸收的牙槽骨渐进性位点开发及即刻种植体植入:一例报告
Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:310931. doi: 10.1155/2013/310931. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
5
Maxillary sinus functions and complications with lateral window and osteotome sinus floor elevation procedures followed by dental implants placement: a retrospective study in 60 patients.上颌窦功能及外侧开窗和骨凿上颌窦底提升术继以牙种植体植入的并发症:一项对60例患者的回顾性研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 May 1;14(3):405-13. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1336.
6
Split-mouth designs in orthodontics: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trials.口腔正畸中的分牙设计:综述及其在正畸临床试验中的应用。
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Dec;35(6):783-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs108. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
7
Reamer-mediated transalveolar sinus floor elevation without osteotome and simultaneous implant placement in the maxillary molar area: clinical outcomes of 391 implants in 380 patients.经磨牙后区牙槽嵴顶开窗提升联合同期种植在磨牙区的临床效果:380 例患者 391 枚种植体的临床疗效观察。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):866-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02216.x. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
8
Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: a randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference.用于种植体修复的牙槽嵴窦底提升术:一项比较Cosci技术和Summers技术的随机临床试验。关于并发症和患者偏好的初步报告。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Autumn;3(3):221-32.
9
A 10-year longitudinal study of 160 implants simultaneously installed in severely atrophic posterior maxillas grafted with autogenous bone and a synthetic bioactive resorbable graft.一项长达 10 年的纵向研究,共涉及 160 例种植体,这些种植体同时植入了经自体骨和合成生物可吸收移植物移植的严重萎缩的上颌后部。
Implant Dent. 2010 Aug;19(4):351-60. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181e59d03.
10
Lack of adjunctive benefit of Er:YAG laser in non-surgical periodontal treatment: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial.Er:YAG 激光在非手术牙周治疗中辅助获益的缺失:一项随机分组对照临床研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Jun;37(6):526-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01560.x.