Al-Almaie Saad, Kavarodi Abdul Majeed, Alorf Ali, Alzahrani Saeed
Medical Administration, King Fahd Military Medical Complex, Dhahran 31932, KSA.
Department of Dental Surgery, King Fahd Military Medical Complex, Dhahran 31932, KSA.
Open Dent J. 2017 Nov 30;11:603-608. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010603. eCollection 2017.
The objective of this study is to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of implant placement and patient appraisal for two sinus lift techniques using both crestal and lateral techniques for bilateral sinus left in a split-mouth design.
All implants were successfully osseointegrated without any clinical complications or peri-implant radiolucency during the follow-up period of maximum 3 years.
In terms of outcomes postoperative vertigo showed to be a major concern with the crestal approach, this approach is preferred over the lateral technique because of the reduced time required for the procedure and because it is less invasive.
Most patients preferred the crestal approach over the lateral approach due to the delay in implant placement.
本研究的目的是采用分口设计,比较和评估使用嵴顶和外侧两种技术对双侧上颌窦进行提升时种植体植入的效果以及患者评价。
在最长3年的随访期内,所有种植体均成功实现骨整合,无任何临床并发症或种植体周围透射区。
在术后眩晕方面,嵴顶入路是一个主要问题,由于该手术所需时间较短且侵入性较小,因此该入路比外侧技术更受青睐。
由于种植体植入延迟,大多数患者更喜欢嵴顶入路而非外侧入路。