• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Midterm Results of Cementless and Cemented Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty with Mobile Meniscal Bearing: A Prospective Cohort Study.活动半月板假体的非骨水泥型和骨水泥型单髁膝关节置换术的中期结果:一项前瞻性队列研究
Open Orthop J. 2017 Oct 31;11:1173-1178. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011173. eCollection 2017.
2
Cementless versus cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies.非骨水泥型与骨水泥型单髁膝关节置换术的比较:系统综述的比较研究。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Sep;107(3):255-267. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00773-2. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术治疗内侧膝关节骨关节炎的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4391-4403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05539-4. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
4
Short-term survival of cementless Oxford unicondylar knee arthroplasty based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.基于芬兰关节置换登记处的非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术的短期生存率
Knee. 2019 Jun;26(3):768-773. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
Medium-term outcome of cementless, mobile-bearing, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.非骨水泥型、活动平台单髁膝关节置换术的中期疗效
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Feb;7(3):41. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.12.50.
6
Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.非骨水泥型与骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术:非指定用户组的早期结果
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):703-709. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4149-3. Epub 2016 May 9.
7
Cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study.非骨水泥单髁膝关节置换术比骨水泥技术导致更高的疼痛水平:一项前瞻性登记研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2738-2743. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06617-5. Epub 2021 May 25.
8
Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement achieves better ten-year clinical outcomes than cemented: a systematic review.非骨水泥单髁膝关节置换术的十年临床效果优于骨水泥型:一项系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Oct;29(10):3229-3245. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06091-5. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
9
Comparison of the early postoperative outcomes of cementless and cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.非骨水泥型与骨水泥型内侧单髁膝关节置换术后早期疗效比较。
Bone Jt Open. 2024 May 20;5(5):401-410. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.55.BJO-2024-0007.R1.
10
Improved fixation in cementless unicompartmental knee replacement: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial.非骨水泥单间室膝关节置换术中固定的改善:一项随机对照试验的五年结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 7;95(15):1365-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01005.

引用本文的文献

1
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术治疗内侧膝关节骨关节炎的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4391-4403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05539-4. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Cementless versus cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies.非骨水泥型与骨水泥型单髁膝关节置换术的比较:系统综述的比较研究。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Sep;107(3):255-267. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00773-2. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
No association between different in tibial resection level and clinical outcomes six months after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.在牛津单髁膝关节置换术后 6 个月时,不同胫骨切除水平与临床结果之间无关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jan 3;24(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06088-w.
4
No Clinical or Radiographic Differences Between Cemented Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium-Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.骨水泥型钴铬合金与氮化钛铌活动平台单髁膝关节置换术在临床及影像学上无差异。
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Aug 15;55(5):1195-1201. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00486-3. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
Early tibial component loosening of medial UKA after severe medial plateau SONK-report of three cases.严重内侧平台骨质疏松性骨坏死(SONK)后内侧单髁膝关节置换术早期胫骨组件松动:三例报告
J Surg Case Rep. 2021 Jun 17;2021(6):rjab242. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjab242. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Midterm Results of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series.非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术的中期结果:一项回顾性病例系列研究
Open Orthop J. 2018 Jun 14;12:196-202. doi: 10.2174/1874325001812010196. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
The Interaction of Caseload and Usage in Determining Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.病例数量与使用情况在单髁膝关节置换术预后判定中的相互作用:一项荟萃分析
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3228-3237.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.063. Epub 2017 May 11.
2
Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.非骨水泥型与骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术:非指定用户组的早期结果
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):703-709. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4149-3. Epub 2016 May 9.
3
Promising short-term clinical results of the cementless Oxford phase III medial unicondylar knee prosthesis.无骨水泥型牛津三期内侧单髁膝关节假体的短期临床效果良好。
World J Orthop. 2016 Apr 18;7(4):251-7. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i4.251.
4
Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty: An overview.微创膝关节置换术:综述。
World J Orthop. 2015 Nov 18;6(10):804-11. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i10.804.
5
Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: a randomised controlled trial.使用放射立体测量分析对比骨水泥型与非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术:一项随机对照试验
Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):185-91. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34331.
6
The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a review.瑞典膝关节置换登记处:综述。
Bone Joint Res. 2014 Jul;3(7):217-22. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000289.
7
Cemented versus Uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference?骨水泥型与非骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术:有差异吗?
Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:245915. doi: 10.1155/2013/245915. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
8
Improved fixation in cementless unicompartmental knee replacement: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial.非骨水泥单间室膝关节置换术中固定的改善:一项随机对照试验的五年结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 7;95(15):1365-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01005.
9
Cementless fixation in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1000 knees.骨水泥固定的 Oxford 单髁膝关节置换术:1000 例膝关节的多中心研究。
Bone Joint J. 2013 Feb;95-B(2):181-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30411.
10
Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year.无骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换术在术后一年时显示出较少的透光线。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Feb;91(2):185-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21413.

活动半月板假体的非骨水泥型和骨水泥型单髁膝关节置换术的中期结果:一项前瞻性队列研究

Midterm Results of Cementless and Cemented Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty with Mobile Meniscal Bearing: A Prospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Stempin Radosław, Kaczmarek Wiesław, Stempin Kacper, Dutka Julian

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery Promienista Clinic, Poznan, Poland.

Department of Orthopedic & Trauma Surgery Westallgäu Clinic, Wangen, Germany.

出版信息

Open Orthop J. 2017 Oct 31;11:1173-1178. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011173. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2174/1874325001711011173
PMID:29290853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5721307/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) yields good clinical outcome but common revision reasons are loosening and pain. Cementless UKA may reduce the revision rate.

OBJECTIVE

The current study was designed to assess clinical and radiographic outcome of cemented and cementless UKA, using bone quality as determined by the Bone Hardness Test (BHT) as selection criterion for cementless implantation.

METHODS

In this prospective comparative cohort study we analyzed 50 cementless and 29 Oxford consecutive UKA cases. Patients with sufficient bone quality were eligible for cementless UKA. Bone quality was assessed with the BHT, which consisted of exercising pressure with the thumb on the bone surface created after resection of the tibia.

RESULTS

The average surgical times were 62.5 ± 12.6 and 78 ± 16 minutes in the cementless and the cemented group, respectively (p < 0.01). The average thickness of the polyethylene insert was 4.3 ± 1.2 (range, 3 - 9) and 3.7 ± 0.8 (range, 3 - 6) mm, respectively (p = 0.02). Both types of implants yielded excellent clinical and functional results. At an average follow-up time of seven years, we found non-significant differences between clinical results of cementless versus cemented implants.

CONCLUSION

Shorter surgical time makes cementless implantation more attractive to surgeons when considering UKA options for their patients. The average thickness of the polyethylene insert in cementless group was 0.6 mm thinner than in the cemented group. The BHT is a simple and useful test to assess whether patients are eligible for cementless UKA.

摘要

背景

骨水泥型单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)临床效果良好,但常见的翻修原因是假体松动和疼痛。非骨水泥型UKA可能会降低翻修率。

目的

本研究旨在评估骨水泥型和非骨水泥型UKA的临床和影像学结果,将通过骨硬度测试(BHT)确定的骨质量作为非骨水泥植入的选择标准。

方法

在这项前瞻性比较队列研究中,我们分析了50例非骨水泥型和29例牛津连续UKA病例。骨质量充足的患者符合非骨水泥型UKA的条件。使用BHT评估骨质量,该测试包括用拇指在胫骨切除后形成的骨表面施加压力。

结果

非骨水泥组和骨水泥组的平均手术时间分别为62.5±12.6分钟和78±16分钟(p<0.01)。聚乙烯垫片的平均厚度分别为4.3±1.2(范围3 - 9)毫米和3.7±0.8(范围3 - 6)毫米(p = 0.02)。两种类型的植入物均产生了优异的临床和功能结果。平均随访7年时,我们发现非骨水泥型与骨水泥型植入物的临床结果之间无显著差异。

结论

在为患者考虑UKA手术方案时,较短的手术时间使非骨水泥植入对外科医生更具吸引力。非骨水泥组聚乙烯垫片的平均厚度比骨水泥组薄0.6毫米。BHT是一种简单且有用的测试,可用于评估患者是否适合非骨水泥型UKA。