deLemos R A, Coalson J J, Meredith K S, Gerstmann D R, Null D M
Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research San Antonio, Texas.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1989;90:102-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1989.tb03013.x.
To assess the efficacy of high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in the management of infants with hyaline membrane disease (HMD), we compared two HFOV strategies with conventional positive pressure ventilation with positive end expiratory pressure (PPV) for 24 h in premature baboons (140 d gestation). Three out of 14 PPV, five out of five HFOV-E (begun at birth; 15 Hz; I:E 1:2), and none of 10 HFOV-L (begun after 3 h PPV; 10 Hz; I:E 1:2) were killed at 24 h for morphologic examination. Physiologic (Paw, Pa/AO2, IO2, B.P., pulse, blood gases) data on all animals in each group were assessed at each 3 h interval and over time. Intergroup differences in radiographs at 0 and 24 h and in morphology were quantitatively assessed by comparison with a panel of standards. All animals had radiographic HMD. Initial Paw was set higher with HFOV-E (16.8) than PPV or HFOV-L (14.1, 14.1). PPV baboons required increasing Paw to maintain constant Pa/AO2. Six out of 14 PPV animals developed airleak and three out of three had morphologic HMD. In contrast Pa/AO2 was higher in both HFOV groups at lower Paw by 24 h. None of 15 HFOV animals developed airleak. HFOV-E lungs had dramatic differences in morphology with uniform saccular opening and decreased edema and hyaline membranes compared to PPV. HFOV-L had less dramatic effects because of lower Paw and delayed application. Early use of HFOV at a high Paw favorably alters the course of HMD. Unless closely monitored, this strategy results in lung overinflation which may adversely affect venous return and cardiac output.
为评估高频振荡通气(HFOV)在治疗患有透明膜病(HMD)的婴儿中的疗效,我们将两种HFOV策略与在早产狒狒(妊娠140天)中进行24小时的带呼气末正压(PPV)的传统正压通气进行了比较。14只接受PPV的狒狒中有3只、5只接受HFOV-E(出生时开始;15赫兹;吸呼比1:2)的狒狒中有5只,以及10只接受HFOV-L(PPV 3小时后开始;10赫兹;吸呼比1:2)的狒狒中无一在24小时时被处死用于形态学检查。每隔3小时并随时间对每组所有动物的生理数据(气道峰压、动脉血氧分压/肺泡气氧分压比值、吸入氧浓度、血压、脉搏、血气)进行评估。通过与一组标准进行比较,对0小时和24小时时的X线片以及形态学上的组间差异进行定量评估。所有动物均有X线片显示的HMD。HFOV-E组的初始气道峰压(16.8)设定得高于PPV组或HFOV-L组(14.1、14.1)。接受PPV的狒狒需要增加气道峰压以维持恒定的动脉血氧分压/肺泡气氧分压比值。14只接受PPV的动物中有6只出现气漏,3只中有3只出现形态学上的HMD。相比之下,到24小时时,两个HFOV组在较低气道峰压下的动脉血氧分压/肺泡气氧分压比值更高。15只接受HFOV的动物均未出现气漏。与PPV相比,HFOV-E组的肺在形态学上有显著差异,囊泡均匀开放,水肿和透明膜减少。由于气道峰压较低且应用延迟,HFOV-L组的效果不太显著。在较高气道峰压下早期使用HFOV可有利地改变HMD的病程。除非密切监测,该策略会导致肺过度充气,这可能会对静脉回流和心输出量产生不利影响。