Zeravik J, Eckart J, Zimmermann G, Blümel G, Pfeiffer U J, Wellhöfer H
Institut für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Technische, Universität München, FRG.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1989;90:149-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1989.tb03022.x.
A retrospective study of 20 surgical intensive care unit patients is reported. They were ventilated with continuous positive pressure ventilation (CPPV) and then switched to combined high frequency ventilation (CHFV). To find why there were variable responses to CHFV, the data of 20 patients were retrospectively evaluated with respect to respiratory index (RI), compliance (C) and extravascular lung water (EVLW). The results suggest that the indication line for CHFV was a C value greater than 45 ml/cmH2O and an EVLW value greater than 15 ml/kg BW.
报告了一项对20例外科重症监护病房患者的回顾性研究。他们先接受持续正压通气（CPPV），然后转换为联合高频通气（CHFV）。为了找出对CHFV反应各异的原因，对20例患者的数据就呼吸指数（RI）、顺应性（C）和血管外肺水（EVLW）进行了回顾性评估。结果表明，CHFV的适应证标准为C值大于45 ml/cmH2O且EVLW值大于15 ml/kg体重。
