• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

息肉检出率可能预测腺瘤检出率:一项荟萃分析。

Polyp detection rate may predict adenoma detection rate: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Niv Yaron

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;30(3):247-251. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001062.

DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000001062
PMID:29293111
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is defined as the number of colonoscopies with at least one adenoma, expressed as the ratio of the total number of colonoscopies performed. Recently, an application of a conversion factor to estimate the ADR from the polyp detection rate (PDR) was described.

AIM

In this meta-analysis, we examined the correlation between ADR and PDR in the published studies and assessed the relative ratio of these ratios for a better and more accurate estimation.

METHODS

English Medical literature searches were performed for 'PDR' AND 'ADR'. A meta-analysis was carried out for papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria using comprehensive meta-analysis software.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies and 42 sets of data, including 31 623 patients, from nine countries published till 31 August 2017, were found. Funnel plot did not indicate a significant publication bias. relative ratio for ADR calculated from PDR was 0.688, 95% confidence intervals: 0.680-0.695, P value of less than 0.0001 in the meta-analysis fixed model. Heterogeneity (the proportion of inconsistency in individual studies) between studies was significant, with Q=492.753, d.f. (Q) 41, P<0.0001, and I 91.679.

CONCLUSION

We found the ratio of 0.688 can be used to calculate ADR from PDR for the individual endoscopist or for a group of endoscopists before receiving the formal results from the pathology department.

摘要

背景

腺瘤检出率(ADR)定义为至少有一个腺瘤的结肠镜检查数量,以所进行的结肠镜检查总数的比例表示。最近,描述了一种应用转换因子从息肉检出率(PDR)估计ADR的方法。

目的

在这项荟萃分析中,我们研究了已发表研究中ADR与PDR之间的相关性,并评估了这些比率的相对比值,以进行更好、更准确的估计。

方法

对英文医学文献进行“PDR”和“ADR”的检索。使用综合荟萃分析软件对符合纳入标准的论文进行荟萃分析。

结果

共检索到截至2017年8月31日发表的来自9个国家的25项研究和42组数据,包括31623例患者。漏斗图未显示明显的发表偏倚。在荟萃分析固定模型中,由PDR计算得出的ADR相对比值为0.688,95%置信区间:0.680 - 0.695,P值小于0.0001。研究间的异质性(个体研究中不一致的比例)显著,Q = 492.753,自由度(Q)41,P < 0.0001,I² = 91.679。

结论

我们发现0.688这个比值可用于在病理科给出正式结果之前,由个体内镜医师或一组内镜医师根据PDR计算ADR。

相似文献

1
Polyp detection rate may predict adenoma detection rate: a meta-analysis.息肉检出率可能预测腺瘤检出率:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;30(3):247-251. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001062.
2
The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.预测腺瘤检出率的转换因子因结肠镜检查适应证和患者性别而异。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020 Jul;29(4):294-302. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000558.
3
Estimation of the Adenoma Detection Rate From the Polyp Detection Rate by Using a Conversion Factor in a Predominantly Hispanic Population.在以西班牙裔为主的人群中,通过使用转换因子从息肉检出率估算腺瘤检出率。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;49(7):589-93. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000179.
4
Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.筛查结肠镜检查期间的非肿瘤性息肉切除术:对息肉检出率、腺瘤检出率及总体成本的影响
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):370-375.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
5
Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon.近端结肠和远端结肠的息肉和腺瘤检出率。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;108(6):993-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.68. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
6
Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.腺瘤和近端无蒂锯齿状息肉检出率与内镜医师特征的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):627-635. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0564.
7
Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.在受训内镜医师中,息肉检出率与腺瘤检出率密切相关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Aug;65(8):2229-2233. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06049-0. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
8
Lack of impact on polyp detection by fellow involvement during colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.同伴在结肠镜检查中参与对息肉检测的影响缺失:一项荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Dec;58(12):3413-21. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2701-2. Epub 2013 May 22.
9
Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists.最新代高清结肠镜检查可提高受训内镜医师的腺瘤检出率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2756-2762. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06543-5. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
10
Can polyp detection rate be used prospectively as a marker of adenoma detection rate?息肉检出率能否前瞻性地作为腺瘤检出率的标志物?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1141-1148. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5785-5. Epub 2017 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Adenoma Detection Rate and Polyp Detection Rate among Gastroenterology Fellows and Consultants in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Cross-sectional Study.菲律宾一家三级医院胃肠病学住院医师和顾问医师的腺瘤检出率及息肉检出率:一项横断面研究
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Sep 13;58(16):30-41. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.8395. eCollection 2024.
2
Overall Polyp Detection Rate as a Surrogate Measure for Screening Efficacy Independent of Histopathology: Evidence from National Endoscopy Database.作为独立于组织病理学的筛查效果替代指标的总体息肉检出率:来自国家内镜数据库的证据。
Life (Basel). 2024 May 21;14(6):654. doi: 10.3390/life14060654.
3
Performance comparison between two computer-aided detection colonoscopy models by trainees using different false positive thresholds: a cross-sectional study in Thailand.
泰国的一项横断面研究:学员使用不同假阳性阈值对两种计算机辅助检测结肠镜检查模型的性能比较
Clin Endosc. 2024 Mar;57(2):217-225. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.145. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
4
Clinical value of sigmoid colon water exchange colonoscopy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.乙状结肠镜水交换结肠镜检查的临床价值:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 22;13(1):13704. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40706-4.
5
Implementing visual cues to improve the efficacy of screening colonoscopy: exploiting the Hawthorne effect.运用视觉线索提高结肠镜筛查效果:利用霍桑效应
Ann Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul-Aug;33(4):374-378. doi: 10.20524/aog.2020.0491. Epub 2020 May 10.
6
Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.在受训内镜医师中,息肉检出率与腺瘤检出率密切相关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Aug;65(8):2229-2233. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06049-0. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
7
Factors associated with polyp detection during colonoscopy: A retrospective observational study.结肠镜检查中息肉检出的相关因素:一项回顾性观察研究。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019 Sep;35(9):572-577. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12090. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
8
Polyp detection rates as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy.作为临床结肠镜检查与筛查结肠镜检查质量指标的息肉检出率
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Feb;7(2):E195-E202. doi: 10.1055/a-0796-6477. Epub 2019 Jan 18.