Suppr超能文献

乙状结肠镜水交换结肠镜检查的临床价值:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。

Clinical value of sigmoid colon water exchange colonoscopy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 222 Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Dalian Friendship Hospital, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 22;13(1):13704. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40706-4.

Abstract

This prospective randomized controlled trial investigated the clinical value of sigmoid colon water exchange (SWE) colonoscopy by comparing it with air insufflation (AI) colonoscopy in terms of the patient's pain score, insertion time, and screening quality. Consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy without sedation were randomized into an AI group (n = 267) or an SWE group (n = 255). Patient characteristics, history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, maximum pain score, insertion time, cecal intubation rate, polyp detection rate, and the need for maneuvers were recorded. There was no significant between-group difference in insertion time, cecal intubation rate, assisted maneuvers (abdominal pressure, changing patients' position), or polyp detection rate (P > 0.05). The mean maximum pain score was significantly lower in the SWE group than in the AI group. (3.57 ± 2.01 vs. 4.69 ± 1.83, P < 0.001). For patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery and those who were overweight (body mass index > 24), the maximum pain scores were lower in the SWE group than in the AI group (3.67 ± 1.95 vs. 4.88 ± 1.80, P < 0.001; 3.40 ± 1.96 vs. 4.79 ± 1.97, P < 0.001, respectively). SWE colonoscopy can significantly reduce abdominal pain with non-inferior screening quality and does not increase insertion time.Trial registration number: ChiCTR2200059057 (date April 23, 2022).

摘要

这项前瞻性随机对照试验通过比较乙状结肠水交换(SWE)结肠镜检查与空气注入(AI)结肠镜检查在患者疼痛评分、插入时间和筛查质量方面的临床价值。对未经镇静的结肠镜检查患者进行连续随机分组,分为 AI 组(n = 267)或 SWE 组(n = 255)。记录患者特征、腹部或盆腔手术史、最大疼痛评分、插入时间、盲肠插管率、息肉检出率和需要操作的情况。两组间插入时间、盲肠插管率、辅助操作(腹部压力、改变患者体位)或息肉检出率无显著差异(P > 0.05)。SWE 组的平均最大疼痛评分明显低于 AI 组(3.57 ± 2.01 与 4.69 ± 1.83,P < 0.001)。对于有腹部或盆腔手术史和超重(体重指数 > 24)的患者,SWE 组的最大疼痛评分低于 AI 组(3.67 ± 1.95 与 4.88 ± 1.80,P < 0.001;3.40 ± 1.96 与 4.79 ± 1.97,P < 0.001)。SWE 结肠镜检查可显著减轻腹痛,同时不增加插入时间,筛查质量不劣于 AI 结肠镜检查。

试验注册号

ChiCTR2200059057(日期 2022 年 4 月 23 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f4c/10444785/ea33d5b41138/41598_2023_40706_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验