Steel Amie, Leach Matthew, Wardle Jon, Sibbritt David, Schloss Janet, Diezel Helene, Adams Jon
1 Office of Research, Endeavour College of Natural Health , Fortitude Valley, Australia .
2 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney , Ultimo, Australia .
J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Apr;24(4):385-394. doi: 10.1089/acm.2017.0206. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
This study aims to describe the Australian complementary medicine (CM) workforce, including practice and professional characteristics.
National cross-sectional survey.
SETTINGS/LOCATION: Australia.
Any individual who self-identified as a practitioner qualified in any one of 14 CM professions and working in any state or territory of Australia was eligible to participate in the survey.
A 19-item online survey was developed following a review of existing CM workforce data and in alignment with other CM workforce survey projects in progress at the time. The survey items were presented under three main constructs: demographic characteristics, professional characteristics, and practice characteristics.
Descriptive statistical analysis, including frequencies and percentages, of multiple choice survey items was used. Open response items were analyzed to determine the mean, standard deviation (SD), minimum, and maximum. The demographic data were evaluated for representativeness based on previously reported CM workforce figures.
The survey was completed by 1306 CM practitioners and was found to be nationally representative compared with the most recent registrant data from the Chinese Medicine Board of Australia. Participants primarily practiced in the most populous Australian states and worked in at least one urban clinical location. Most participants held an Advanced Diploma qualification or lower, obtained their qualification ten more years ago, and practiced in a clinical environment alongside at least one other practitioner from another health profession. Participants reported diverse clinical practice specialties and occupational roles. Per week, participants worked an average of 3.7 days and treated 23.6 clients.
The results from this survey of practitioners from most complementary professions in Australia provide new insights into the national complementary medicine workforce. Further exploration of the CM workforce is warranted to inform all who provide patient care and develop health policy for better patient and public health outcomes.
本研究旨在描述澳大利亚补充医学(CM)从业者队伍,包括其执业情况和专业特征。
全国性横断面调查。
澳大利亚。
任何自认为具备14种补充医学专业中任意一种资格且在澳大利亚任何州或领地工作的个人均有资格参与该调查。
在回顾现有补充医学从业者队伍数据并与当时正在进行的其他补充医学从业者队伍调查项目保持一致的基础上,制定了一项包含19个项目的在线调查。调查项目分为三大类:人口统计学特征、专业特征和执业特征。
对多项选择题调查项目进行描述性统计分析,包括频数和百分比。对开放式回答项目进行分析以确定均值、标准差(SD)、最小值和最大值。根据先前报告的补充医学从业者队伍数据评估人口统计学数据的代表性。
1306名补充医学从业者完成了该调查,与澳大利亚中医委员会最新的注册人员数据相比,该调查结果具有全国代表性。参与者主要在澳大利亚人口最多的几个州执业,且至少在一个城市临床地点工作。大多数参与者拥有高级文凭或更低的学历,他们在十年多以前获得资格,并且在临床环境中与至少一名来自其他健康专业的从业者一起工作。参与者报告了不同的临床执业专业和职业角色。参与者每周平均工作3.7天,治疗23.6名患者。
这项对澳大利亚大多数补充医学专业从业者的调查结果为全国补充医学从业者队伍提供了新的见解。有必要对补充医学从业者队伍进行进一步探索,以便为所有提供患者护理的人员提供信息,并制定卫生政策以实现更好的患者和公众健康结果。