Suppr超能文献

香薰疗法预防或治疗疾病、医学或临床前状况及损伤的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Effectiveness of aromatherapy for prevention or treatment of disease, medical or preclinical conditions, and injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 26;11(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02015-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aromatherapy - the therapeutic use of essential oils from plants (flowers, herbs or trees) to treat ill health and promote physical, emotional and spiritual well-being - is one of the most widely used natural therapies reported by consumers in Western countries. The Australian Government Department of Health (via the National Health and Medical Research Council) has commissioned a suite of independent evidence evaluations to inform the 2019-20 Review of the Australian Government Rebate on Private Health Insurance for Natural Therapies. This protocol is for one of the evaluations: a systematic review that aims to examine the effectiveness of aromatherapy in preventing and/or treating injury, disease, medical conditions or preclinical conditions.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria: randomised trials comparing (1) aromatherapy (delivered by any mode) to no aromatherapy (inactive controls), (2) aromatherapy (delivered by massage) to massage alone or (3) aromatherapy to 'gold standard' treatments.

POPULATIONS

any condition, pre-condition, injury or risk factor (excluding healthy participants without clearly identified risk factors).

OUTCOMES

any for which aromatherapy is indicated. Searches: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), with a supplementary search of PubMed (covering a 6-month lag period for processing records in CENTRAL and records not indexed in MEDLINE), AMED and Emcare. No date, language or geographic limitations will be applied.

DATA AND ANALYSIS

screening by two authors, independently (records indexed by Aromatherapy or Oils volatile or aromatherapy in title; all full text) or one author (remaining records) with second author until 80% agreement. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment (ROB 2.0) will be piloted by three authors, then completed by a single author and checked by a second. Comparisons will be based on broad outcome categories (e.g. pain, emotional functioning, sleep disruption) stratified by population subgroups (e.g. chronic pain conditions, cancer, dementia) as defined in the analytic framework for the review. Meta-analysis or other synthesis methods will be used to combine results across studies. GRADE methods will be used to assess certainty of evidence and summarise findings.

DISCUSSION

Results of the systematic review will provide a comprehensive and up-to-date synthesis of evidence about the effectiveness of aromatherapy.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021268244.

摘要

背景

芳香疗法——利用植物(花卉、草药或树木)的精油进行治疗,以治疗疾病并促进身体、情感和精神健康——是西方国家消费者报告的最广泛使用的自然疗法之一。澳大利亚政府卫生部(通过国家健康和医学研究委员会)委托进行了一系列独立的证据评估,为 2019-20 年对澳大利亚政府私人医疗保险自然疗法回扣的审查提供信息。本方案是其中一项评估的内容:一项系统评价旨在检查芳香疗法在预防和/或治疗伤害、疾病、医疗状况或临床前状况方面的有效性。

方法

纳入标准:比较(1)芳香疗法(通过任何方式提供)与无芳香疗法(非活性对照),(2)芳香疗法(通过按摩提供)与单独按摩或(3)芳香疗法与“金标准”治疗的随机试验。

人群

任何疾病、预疾病、伤害或风险因素(不包括没有明确确定风险因素的健康参与者)。

结局

任何与芳香疗法相关的结局。检索:Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL),并对 PubMed 进行补充检索(涵盖 CENTRAL 中记录处理的 6 个月滞后期和未在 MEDLINE 中索引的记录)、AMED 和 Emcare。不会应用日期、语言或地理限制。

数据和分析

两名作者(通过芳香疗法或油挥发性或标题中的芳香疗法进行索引的记录;所有全文)或一名作者(其余记录)独立进行筛选,直到达到 80%的协议,然后由第二位作者进行筛选。数据提取和偏倚风险评估(ROB 2.0)将由三位作者进行试点,然后由一位作者完成,并由第二位作者进行检查。比较将基于分析框架中定义的人群亚组(例如慢性疼痛疾病、癌症、痴呆)按广泛的结局类别(例如疼痛、情绪功能、睡眠障碍)进行分层。将使用荟萃分析或其他综合方法来合并研究结果。GRADE 方法将用于评估证据的确定性并总结研究结果。

讨论

系统评价的结果将提供关于芳香疗法有效性的全面和最新的综合证据。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42021268244。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc10/9317467/0f6df7a1f914/13643_2022_2015_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验