1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Head & Neck Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2 Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Head & Neck Oncology, Ohio State University, James Cancer Centre and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb;158(2):265-272. doi: 10.1177/0194599817742373. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
Objective To determine the predictors of length of stay (LOS), readmission within 30 days, and unplanned return to the operating room (OR) within 30 days in head and neck free flap patients. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary academic cancer hospital. Subjects and Methods All head and neck free flap patients at The Ohio State University (OSU, 2006-2012) were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression to assess the impact of patient factors, flap and wound factors, and intraoperative factors on the aforementioned quality metric outcomes. Results In total, 515 patients were identified, of whom 66% had oral cavity cancers, 33% had recurrent tumors, and 28% underwent primary radiotherapy. Of the patients, 31.5% had a LOS greater than 9 days, predicted by longer operative time, oral cavity and pharyngeal tumor sites, blood transfusion, diabetes mellitus, and any complication. A total of 12.6% of patients were readmitted within 30 days predicted by absent OSU preoperative assessment clinic attendance and any complication, and 14.8% of patients had an unplanned OR return predicted by advanced age. Conclusions When assessing quality metrics, adjustment for the complexity involved in managing patients with head and neck cancer with a high comorbidity index, clean contaminated wounds, and a high degree of primary radiotherapy is important. Patients seen in a preoperative assessment clinic had a lower risk of readmission postoperatively, and this should be recommended for all head and neck free flap patients. Quality improvement projects should focus on predictors and prevention of complications as this was the number one predictor of both increased length of stay and readmission.
确定头颈部游离皮瓣患者住院时间(LOS)、30 天内再入院和 30 天内计划外返回手术室(OR)的预测因素。
病例系列,病历回顾。
三级学术癌症医院。
评估了俄亥俄州立大学(OSU,2006-2012 年)的所有头颈部游离皮瓣患者。多变量逻辑回归评估患者因素、皮瓣和伤口因素以及术中因素对上述质量指标结果的影响。
共确定了 515 名患者,其中 66%的患者患有口腔癌,33%的患者患有复发性肿瘤,28%的患者接受了原发性放疗。在这些患者中,31.5%的患者 LOS 大于 9 天,这与手术时间延长、口腔和咽部肿瘤部位、输血、糖尿病和任何并发症有关。共有 12.6%的患者在 30 天内再入院,这与 OSU 术前评估诊所就诊缺席和任何并发症有关,14.8%的患者计划外返回 OR,这与年龄较大有关。
在评估质量指标时,对头颈部癌症患者进行调整非常重要,这些患者具有高合并症指数、清洁污染伤口和高初级放疗程度。在术前评估诊所就诊的患者术后再入院的风险较低,应推荐所有头颈部游离皮瓣患者就诊。质量改进项目应重点关注并发症的预测和预防,因为这是 LOS 延长和再入院的首要预测因素。