• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄亥俄州磷风险指数的场外评估

Edge-Of-Field Evaluation of the Ohio Phosphorus Risk Index.

作者信息

Williams Mark R, King Kevin W, LaBarge Gregory A, Confesor Remegio B, Fausey Norman R

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2017 Nov;46(6):1306-1313. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.05.0198.

DOI:10.2134/jeq2016.05.0198
PMID:29293845
Abstract

The Phosphorus Index (PI) has been the cornerstone for phosphorus (P)-based management and planning over the past twenty years, yet field-scale evaluation of many state PIs has been limited. In this study, P loads measured in surface runoff and tile discharge from 40 agricultural fields in Ohio with prevailing management practices were used to evaluate the Ohio PI. Annual P loads were highly variable among fields (dissolved reactive P: 0.03-4.51 kg ha, total P: 0.03-6.88 kg ha). Both measured annual dissolved reactive P ( = 0.36, < 0.001) and total P ( = 0.25, < 0.001) loads were significantly related to Ohio PI score. The relationship between measured load and PI score substantially improved when averaged annual field values were used (dissolved reactive P: = 0.71, total P: = 0.73), indicating that the Ohio PI should be utilized to evaluate average annual risk of P loss, rather than as an annual risk tool. Comparison between the Ohio PI and other established local and national metrics resulted in large differences in potential P management recommendations for the monitored fields. In the near term, revision of Ohio PI risk categories and management recommendations using local P loading thresholds is needed. To meet the minimum criteria for state PI tools, future research efforts should focus on using measured field data (i) to incorporate new input factors (i.e., P application timing and leaching potential) into the Ohio PI, and (ii) to calibrate and validate the Ohio PI to provide better P risk assessments and management recommendations.

摘要

在过去二十年中,磷指数(PI)一直是基于磷(P)的管理和规划的基石,但许多州磷指数的田间尺度评估一直有限。在本研究中,利用俄亥俄州40个采用现行管理措施的农田地表径流和瓦管排水中测量的磷负荷来评估俄亥俄州磷指数。各农田的年磷负荷变化很大(溶解性反应磷:0.03 - 4.51千克/公顷,总磷:0.03 - 6.88千克/公顷)。测量的年溶解性反应磷( = 0.36, < 0.001)和总磷( = 0.25, < 0.001)负荷均与俄亥俄州磷指数得分显著相关。当使用年平均田间值时,测量负荷与磷指数得分之间的关系显著改善(溶解性反应磷: = 0.71,总磷: = 0.73),这表明俄亥俄州磷指数应用于评估磷流失的年平均风险,而不是作为年度风险工具。俄亥俄州磷指数与其他既定的地方和国家指标之间的比较导致了对监测农田潜在磷管理建议的巨大差异。短期内,需要使用当地磷负荷阈值修订俄亥俄州磷指数风险类别和管理建议。为满足州磷指数工具的最低标准,未来的研究工作应集中于利用实测田间数据:(i)将新的输入因素(即磷施用时间和淋溶潜力)纳入俄亥俄州磷指数,以及(ii)校准和验证俄亥俄州磷指数,以提供更好的磷风险评估和管理建议。

相似文献

1
Edge-Of-Field Evaluation of the Ohio Phosphorus Risk Index.俄亥俄州磷风险指数的场外评估
J Environ Qual. 2017 Nov;46(6):1306-1313. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.05.0198.
2
Crop growth, hydrology, and water quality dynamics in agricultural fields across the Western Lake Erie Basin: Multi-site verification of the Nutrient Tracking Tool (NTT).西伊利湖流域农业区的作物生长、水文学和水质动态:养分追踪工具(NTT)的多站点验证。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 15;726:138485. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138485. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
3
Cover crops differentially influenced nitrogen and phosphorus loss in tile drainage and surface runoff from agricultural fields in Ohio, USA.覆盖作物对美国俄亥俄州农田中沟渠排水和地表径流中氮磷流失的影响存在差异。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 1;293:112910. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112910. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
4
Modified APEX model for Simulating Macropore Phosphorus Contributions to Tile Drains.用于模拟大孔隙对排水管道磷贡献的改进APEX模型。
J Environ Qual. 2017 Nov;46(6):1413-1423. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.06.0218.
5
Connecting soil characteristics to edge-of-field water quality in Ohio.俄亥俄州的田间水质与土壤特性的关系。
J Environ Qual. 2023 May-Jun;52(3):476-491. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20308. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
Decreasing Phosphorus Loss in Tile-Drained Landscapes Using Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum.使用烟气脱硫石膏减少瓦管排水景观中的磷流失
J Environ Qual. 2016 Sep;45(5):1722-1730. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.04.0132.
7
Legacy phosphorus concentration-discharge relationships in surface runoff and tile drainage from Ohio crop fields.俄亥俄州农田地表径流水和排水渠中磷浓度-排放量关系的历史演变。
J Environ Qual. 2020 May;49(3):675-687. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20070. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
Sensitivity Analysis of the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) for Phosphorus Loads in Tile-Drained Landscapes.农业政策/环境扩展模型(APEX)对瓦管排水景观中磷负荷的敏感性分析
J Environ Qual. 2015 Jul;44(4):1099-110. doi: 10.2134/jeq2014.12.0527.
9
Combining field phosphorus runoff risk assessments with whole-farm phosphorus balances to guide manure management decisions.结合田间磷径流风险评估和全场磷平衡来指导粪肥管理决策。
J Environ Qual. 2020 Mar;49(2):496-508. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20043. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
10
Phosphorus and nitrogen in runoff after phosphorus- or nitrogen-based manure applications.施磷或施氮肥后径流中的磷和氮。
J Environ Qual. 2011 May-Jun;40(3):949-58. doi: 10.2134/jeq2010.0279.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing Wisconsin P index assessments across cropping systems.在不同种植系统中测试威斯康星P指数评估。
J Environ Qual. 2025 Sep-Oct;54(5):1271-1287. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.70042. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
2
Evaluation of Minnesota Phosphorus Loss Index performance.明尼苏达磷流失指数性能评估。
J Environ Qual. 2025 Jul-Aug;54(4):827-837. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20635. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
3
Phosphorus loss assessment tools: a review of underlying concepts and applicability in cold climates.磷素损失评估工具:寒冷气候下的基本概念和适用性综述。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Feb;27(4):3794-3802. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06800-9. Epub 2019 Dec 9.