• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾脏损伤放射学分类的观察者间可靠性。

Inter-rater reliability in the radiological classification of renal injuries.

机构信息

Division of Radiodiagnosis, Department of Medical Imaging and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Francie van Zijl Avenue, Tygerberg, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2018 Mar;36(3):489-496. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2166-6. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-017-2166-6
PMID:29294163
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although many radiologists invoke the surgical classification of renal injury proposed by the American Association for Surgery in Trauma (AAST), there has been only limited work on the role of the AAST system as an imaging stratification. The aim was to determine the inter-rater reliability (IRR) amongst radiologists and urologists using the AAST system.

METHODS

A 1-year retrospective study of consecutive patients with computed tomography (CT) evidence of renal trauma managed at a Level 1 trauma center. Three radiologists and three urologists independently stratified the presentation CT findings according to the AAST renal trauma classification. Agreement between independent raters and mutually exclusive groups was determined utilizing weighted kappa coefficients.

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients were included. Individual inter-observer agreements ranged from 54/101 (53.4%) to 62/101 (61.4%), with corresponding weighted kappa values from 0.61 to 0.69, constituting substantial agreement. Urologists achieved intra-disciplinary agreement in 49 cases (48.5%) and radiologists in 36 cases (35.6%). Six-reader agreement was achieved in 24 cases (23.7%). The AAST grade I injuries had the highest level of agreement, overall.

CONCLUSION

The finding of substantial IRR amongst radiologists and urologists utilizing the AAST system supports continued use of the broad parameters of the AAST system, with some modification in specific categories with lower agreement.

摘要

介绍

尽管许多放射科医生援引美国外科创伤协会(AAST)提出的外科肾损伤分类,但对 AAST 系统作为影像学分层的作用的研究有限。目的是确定放射科医生和泌尿科医生使用 AAST 系统的组内一致性(IRR)。

方法

对在一级创伤中心接受 CT 证实肾损伤的连续患者进行了为期 1 年的回顾性研究。三位放射科医生和三位泌尿科医生独立根据 AAST 肾损伤分类对 CT 表现进行分层。利用加权 kappa 系数确定独立评分者之间以及相互排斥组之间的一致性。

结果

共纳入 101 例患者。个体观察者之间的一致性范围为 54/101(53.4%)至 62/101(61.4%),对应的加权 kappa 值为 0.61 至 0.69,构成高度一致。泌尿科医生在 49 例(48.5%)中达成了内部一致性,放射科医生在 36 例(35.6%)中达成了内部一致性。六位读者达成了 24 例(23.7%)的一致。总体而言,AAST Ⅰ级损伤的一致性最高。

结论

放射科医生和泌尿科医生使用 AAST 系统的结果显示了实质性的组内一致性,支持继续使用 AAST 系统的广泛参数,对某些一致性较低的特定类别进行一些修改。

相似文献

1
Inter-rater reliability in the radiological classification of renal injuries.肾脏损伤放射学分类的观察者间可靠性。
World J Urol. 2018 Mar;36(3):489-496. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2166-6. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
2
Inter-radiologist agreement for CT scoring of pediatric splenic injuries and effect on an established clinical practice guideline.放射科医生之间关于儿童脾损伤CT评分的一致性及其对既定临床实践指南的影响。
Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Feb;46(2):229-36. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3469-7.
3
Interrater Agreement of CT Grading of Blunt Splenic Injuries: Does the AAST Grading Need to Be Reimagined?钝性脾损伤 CT 分级的组内一致性:AAST 分级是否需要重新构想?
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2024 Feb;75(1):171-177. doi: 10.1177/08465371231184425. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
4
Should blunt segmental vascular renal injuries be considered an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Grade 4 renal injury?是否应将钝性节段性血管性肾损伤视为美国外科创伤协会 4 级肾损伤?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):484-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aa2db4.
5
Only moderate intra- and inter-observer agreement between radiologists and surgeons when grading blunt paediatric hepatic injury on CT scan.在通过CT扫描对小儿钝性肝损伤进行分级时,放射科医生和外科医生之间仅存在中等程度的观察者内和观察者间一致性。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Dec;19(6):392-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1241818.
6
Utility of MDCT findings in predicting patient management outcomes in renal trauma.多层螺旋CT(MDCT)检查结果在预测肾外伤患者治疗结局中的应用价值
Emerg Radiol. 2017 Jun;24(3):263-272. doi: 10.1007/s10140-016-1473-3. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
7
Reliability of injury grading systems for patients with blunt splenic trauma.钝性脾外伤患者损伤分级系统的可靠性
Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):146-50. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
8
Reliability and reproducibility of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma scaling for renal injury and impact on radiologic follow-up.美国创伤外科协会肾损伤分级的可靠性、可重复性及其对影像学随访的影响
Prog Urol. 2018 Jan;28(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
9
MDCT of renal trauma: correlation to AAST organ injury scale.肾外伤的多层螺旋CT:与美国创伤外科学会器官损伤分级的相关性
Clin Imaging. 2014 Jul-Aug;38(4):410-417. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
10
Accuracy of dual bolus single acquisition computed tomography in the diagnosis and grading of adult traumatic splenic parenchymal and vascular injury.双团注单次采集计算机断层扫描在成人创伤性脾实质及血管损伤诊断和分级中的准确性
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017 Dec;61(6):725-731. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12619. Epub 2017 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The RSNA Abdominal Traumatic Injury CT (RATIC) Dataset.RSNA腹部创伤性损伤CT(RATIC)数据集。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2024 Nov;6(6):e240101. doi: 10.1148/ryai.240101.

本文引用的文献

1
Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)描述符在诊断性乳腺钼靶检查中对可疑发现的使用的阅片者间差异:一项针对10名学术放射科医生的多机构研究
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jan;24(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
2
Diagnosis value of multi-slice spiral CT in renal trauma.多层螺旋CT在肾外伤中的诊断价值
J Xray Sci Technol. 2016 Oct 6;24(5):649-655. doi: 10.3233/XST-160585.
3
Renal trauma: imaging evaluation and implications for clinical management.
肾脏创伤:影像学评估及其对临床处理的影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Aug;41(8):1565-79. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0731-x.
4
2015 William Hunter Harridge lecture: how did we go from operating on nearly all injured kidneys to operating on almost none of them?2015年威廉·亨特·哈瑞奇讲座:我们是如何从几乎对所有受伤肾脏进行手术转变为几乎不对任何受伤肾脏进行手术的?
Am J Surg. 2016 Mar;211(3):501-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
5
Towards task shifting? A comparison of the accuracy of acute trauma-radiograph reporting by medical officers and senior radiographers in an African hospital.迈向任务转移?非洲一家医院中医师与资深放射技师对急性创伤X光报告准确性的比较。
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Aug 27;21:308. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.308.6937. eCollection 2015.
6
An update on urotrauma.泌尿生殖道创伤的最新进展。
Curr Opin Urol. 2015 Jul;25(4):323-30. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000184.
7
Grade IV renal trauma management. A revision of the AAST renal injury grading scale is mandatory.IV级肾损伤的处理。美国创伤外科学会(AAST)肾损伤分级标准的修订是必要的。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Apr;42(2):237-41. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0537-5. Epub 2015 May 19.
8
MDCT of blunt renal trauma: imaging findings and therapeutic implications.钝性肾外伤的多层螺旋CT:影像学表现及治疗意义
Insights Imaging. 2015 Apr;6(2):261-72. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0385-1. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
9
The conservative management of renal trauma: a literature review and practical clinical guideline from Australia and New Zealand.肾脏创伤的保守治疗:来自澳大利亚和新西兰的文献回顾和实用临床指南。
BJU Int. 2014 Nov;114 Suppl 1:13-21. doi: 10.1111/bju.12902.
10
Damage control radiology in the severely injured patient: what the anaesthetist needs to know.严重创伤患者的损伤控制性放射学:麻醉医生需要了解的知识。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Aug;113(2):250-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu203.