• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分居女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力的风险:一项使用全国犯罪受害情况调查的多年分析。

Separated Women's Risk for Intimate Partner Violence: A Multiyear Analysis Using the National Crime Victimization Survey.

作者信息

Rezey Maribeth L

机构信息

University of Missouri-St. Louis, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2020 Mar;35(5-6):1055-1080. doi: 10.1177/0886260517692334. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1177/0886260517692334
PMID:29294656
Abstract

The current study assesses the relative influence of various individual-level characteristics on the probability of intimate partner violence (IPV) for separated and nonseparated women. While previous studies have found that separated women do in fact have a higher risk for IPV than nonseparated women, these largely bivariate examinations of marital status and risk for IPV have often not considered the effect other characteristics may have on risk estimates. The current study uses the 1995-2010 National Crime Victimization Surveys to examine how separated women's risk for IPV compares with nonseparated women's risk for IPV over time, and if separated, women's risk for IPV is a function of either being separated or possessing characteristics known to be correlated with risk. A key strength of this study is its ability to account for the confounding effects of change in separation status and IPV. Results show that separated women were more likely than nonseparated women to be victims of IPV in most years from 1995 to 2010, and after controlling for the effects of individual-level characteristics, their risk did not change. Age was the only significant predictor of women's risk for IPV, net of other factors, but had no effect on separated women's risk for IPV. These results suggest that the status of being separated has the strongest effect on women's risk for IPV. The importance of understanding how the separation period makes women more likely to be victims of IPV is discussed.

摘要

本研究评估了各种个体层面特征对分居和未分居女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)可能性的相对影响。虽然先前的研究发现,分居女性遭受IPV的风险实际上确实高于未分居女性,但这些对婚姻状况和IPV风险的大多为双变量的研究往往没有考虑其他特征可能对风险估计产生的影响。本研究使用1995 - 2010年全国犯罪受害情况调查,来考察随着时间推移,分居女性遭受IPV的风险与未分居女性遭受IPV的风险相比如何,以及如果是分居女性,其遭受IPV的风险是分居状态的函数还是与已知风险相关特征的函数。本研究的一个关键优势在于其能够解释分居状态变化和IPV的混杂效应。结果表明,在1995年至2010年的大多数年份里,分居女性比未分居女性更有可能成为IPV的受害者,并且在控制了个体层面特征的影响后,她们的风险没有变化。在排除其他因素后,年龄是女性遭受IPV风险的唯一显著预测因素,但对分居女性遭受IPV的风险没有影响。这些结果表明,分居状态对女性遭受IPV的风险影响最大。文中讨论了理解分居期如何使女性更易成为IPV受害者的重要性。

相似文献

1
Separated Women's Risk for Intimate Partner Violence: A Multiyear Analysis Using the National Crime Victimization Survey.分居女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力的风险:一项使用全国犯罪受害情况调查的多年分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Mar;35(5-6):1055-1080. doi: 10.1177/0886260517692334. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
2
Women's Status and Intimate Partner Violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo.刚果民主共和国的妇女地位与亲密伴侣暴力行为
J Interpers Violence. 2015 Sep;30(14):2526-40. doi: 10.1177/0886260514553118. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
3
Factors associated with IPV victimisation of women and perpetration by men in migrant communities of Nepal.尼泊尔移民社区中与女性遭受 IPV 侵害和男性施暴相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 30;14(7):e0210258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210258. eCollection 2019.
4
Healthcare Access and Cancer Screening Among Victims of Intimate Partner Violence.亲密关系暴力受害者的医疗保健机会和癌症筛查。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 May;27(5):607-614. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6402. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
5
Women's Work, Gender Roles, and Intimate Partner Violence in Nigeria.尼日利亚的女性工作、性别角色与亲密伴侣暴力
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Oct;46(7):1923-1938. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1023-4. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
6
Feminism, status inconsistency, and women's intimate partner victimization in heterosexual relationships.女权主义、地位不一致与异性恋关系中女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力的情况。
Violence Against Women. 2014 Jul;20(7):825-45. doi: 10.1177/1077801214543385. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
7
Intimate Partner Violence, Police Involvement, and Women's Trauma Symptoms.亲密伴侣暴力、警察介入和妇女创伤症状。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Apr;36(7-8):NP3510-NP3523. doi: 10.1177/0886260518780409. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
8
Does exposure to interparental violence increase women's risk of intimate partner violence? Evidence from Nigeria demographic and health survey.遭受父母间暴力会增加女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力的风险吗?来自尼日利亚人口与健康调查的证据。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018 Jan 11;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12914-018-0143-9.
9
Intimate Partner Violence in Honduras: Ecological Correlates of Self-Reported Victimization and Fear of a Male Partner.洪都拉斯的亲密伴侣暴力:自我报告的受害和对男性伴侣恐惧的生态关联。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Dec;36(23-24):11483-11508. doi: 10.1177/0886260519898441. Epub 2020 Jan 12.
10
The Association of Investment Model Variables and Dyadic Patterns of Physical Partner Violence: A Study of College Women.投资模式变量与伴侣身体暴力二元模式的关联:一项针对大学女生的研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2016 Oct;31(16):2751-70. doi: 10.1177/0886260515580364. Epub 2015 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's economic independence and physical intimate partner violence (IPV) during separation.女性在分居期间的经济独立与亲密伴侣身体暴力(IPV)
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 20;20(6):e0326529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326529. eCollection 2025.
2
"Part of the abuse is not letting me get him medical care": A qualitative examination of children's unmet health needs in the context of post-separation abuse.“虐待的一部分表现为不让我带他去就医”:对分居后虐待背景下儿童未得到满足的健康需求的定性研究
Child Abuse Negl. 2025 Jun;164:107451. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107451. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
3
"It Was one of the Most Revealing Experiences of My Life:" Women's Views on Group Counseling for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.
“这是我一生中最具启发性的经历之一:”女性对亲密伴侣暴力幸存者团体咨询的看法。
Violence Against Women. 2024 Jun 13;31(11):10778012241259712. doi: 10.1177/10778012241259712.
4
Post-separation abuse: A literature review connecting tactics to harm.分离后虐待:一项将策略与伤害联系起来的文献综述。
J Fam Trauma Child Custody Child Dev. 2024;21(2):145-164. doi: 10.1080/26904586.2023.2177233. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
5
Intimate Partner Violence Risk Factors: A Vulnerability-Adaptation Stress Model Approach.亲密伴侣暴力风险因素:脆弱性-适应-应激模型方法。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Aug;39(15-16):3738-3763. doi: 10.1177/08862605241234352. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
6
"I Worry About My Kids' Safety When They Visit": Mothers' Perceptions of Father/Child Post-Separation Contact in the Context of IPV.“孩子去看望父亲时,我担心他们的安全”:遭受亲密伴侣暴力的母亲对分居后父亲与孩子接触情况的看法
Violence Against Women. 2025 Apr;31(5):1150-1173. doi: 10.1177/10778012231225232. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
7
"He Tells People That I Am Going to Kill My Children": Post-Separation Coercive Control in Men Who Perpetrate IPV.“他告诉人们我要杀了我的孩子”:实施 IPV 的男性在分手后的强制性控制。
Violence Against Women. 2024 Sep;30(11):2853-2876. doi: 10.1177/10778012231166408. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
8
Concerns about Household Violence during the COVID-19 Pandemic.对 COVID-19 大流行期间家庭暴力问题的关注。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;19(22):14633. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214633.
9
"Micro-cultures" of conflict: Couple-level perspectives on reasons for and causes of intimate partner violence in young adulthood.冲突的“微观文化”:关于青年期亲密伴侣暴力的原因及成因的伴侣层面观点
J Marriage Fam. 2022 Aug;84(4):1062-1080. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12864. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
10
Post-separation abuse: A concept analysis.分离后虐待:概念分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Apr;79(4):1225-1246. doi: 10.1111/jan.15310. Epub 2022 May 27.