Suppr超能文献

“误解”与本科女生对性侵犯的概念化:一项定性分析。

"Miscommunication" and Undergraduate Women's Conceptualizations of Sexual Assault: A Qualitative Analysis.

机构信息

VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.

Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):33-61. doi: 10.1177/0886260517726412. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

Abstract

Approximately 60% of legally defined rape victims do not label their experiences as "rape," most of whom label the experience as "a serious miscommunication." However, little research has examined why women choose this label. Labeling rape as a miscommunication could be problematic if chosen due to stereotypical conceptions that one's experience is not "real" rape. The present study used a mixed-methodological approach to understand why women might refer to rape as a "miscommunication," and how their reasons for labeling might differ from those who label their experiences and those who are nonlabeled (i.e., unequivocally state that they were "not victimized"). Participants included 123 undergraduate women who experienced rape. Participants responded to how they labeled rape and answered questions regarding assault characteristics, disclosure, reporting, and self- and perpetrator blame. Chi-square analyses assessed labeling group differences. Responses to an open-ended question about factors contributing to their labeling decision were content analyzed. Whereas miscommunication-labeled and nonlabeled victims reported similar assault characteristics in the quantitative analyses, qualitative content analyses revealed varying reasons for labeling rape as miscommunication, not victimization, and rape. Over three quarters of miscommunication-labeled victims reported that one or more of the following factors influenced their labeling: victim and perpetrator substance use, sexual activity prior to the rape, and perceptions that one did not express nonconsent strongly enough and that the perpetrator "did not realize" their lack of desire. Whereas miscommunication-labeled and nonlabeled victims reported similar assault characteristics, the extent to which those assault characteristics affected their labeling differed. Those who labeled their experiences as miscommunication gave reasons for their label that centered on factors which reflect inconsistencies between their experiences and "stereotypical rape." Misperceptions of rape can be addressed via prevention programming and clinical work.

摘要

大约 60%法律定义的强奸受害者不将自己的经历称为“强奸”,其中大多数人将这种经历称为“严重的沟通失误”。然而,很少有研究探讨为什么女性会选择这样的标签。如果选择将强奸标记为沟通失误,可能会有问题,因为这可能是基于一个人的经历不是“真正的”强奸的刻板印象概念。本研究采用混合方法来理解为什么女性可能将强奸称为“沟通失误”,以及她们的标记原因与那些标记自己经历和那些非标记(即明确表示自己“未受害”)的人有何不同。参与者包括 123 名经历过强奸的本科女性。参与者对他们如何标记强奸以及回答有关攻击特征、披露、报告以及自我和施害者指责的问题。卡方分析评估了标记组之间的差异。对一个关于导致他们标记决定的因素的开放式问题的回答进行了内容分析。虽然沟通失误标记和非标记受害者在定量分析中报告了类似的攻击特征,但定性内容分析揭示了将强奸标记为沟通失误、未受害和强奸的不同原因。超过四分之三的沟通失误标记受害者报告说,一个或多个以下因素影响了他们的标记:受害者和施害者的物质使用、强奸前的性活动,以及对一个人没有足够强烈地表达不同意的看法,以及施害者“没有意识到”他们的欲望缺乏。虽然沟通失误标记和非标记受害者报告了类似的攻击特征,但这些攻击特征对他们标记的影响程度不同。那些将自己的经历标记为沟通失误的人给出了他们标记的原因,这些原因集中在反映他们的经历和“刻板的强奸”之间不一致的因素上。对强奸的误解可以通过预防计划和临床工作来解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验