• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短信中的交际顺应:探究好感、权力和性别作为短信体预测因素的情况。

Communication accommodation in text messages: Exploring liking, power, and sex as predictors of textisms.

作者信息

Adams Aubrie, Miles Jai, Dunbar Norah E, Giles Howard

机构信息

a California Polytechnic State University , San Luis , Obispo.

b University of California , Santa Barbara.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(4):474-490. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1421895. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1080/00224545.2017.1421895
PMID:29297763
Abstract

This mixed-methods study applies Communication Accommodation Theory to explore how liking, power, and sex predict one's likelihood for using textisms in digital interpersonal interactions. Textisms are digital cues that convey nonverbal meaning and emotion in text communication. The main experiment used a hypothetical texting scenario to manipulate textism amounts (none/many) and participant's perceived power levels (low/equal/high) during texting interactions to examine the number of textisms participants used in subsequent responses in comparison to the number of textisms they viewed. Primary results show that (1) participants moderately converged to use similar amounts of textisms, and (2) those with low power who viewed many textisms were more likely to use textisms themselves during subsequent responses. Through the examination of adaption behaviors in text messaging, scholars can better understand the contexts in which users will include textisms to intentionally convey nonverbal meaning and emotion in digital communication.

摘要

这项混合方法研究运用沟通调适理论,以探究喜好、权力和性别如何预测一个人在数字人际互动中使用短信体的可能性。短信体是在文本交流中传达非言语意义和情感的数字线索。主要实验采用了一个假设的短信场景,在短信互动过程中操纵短信体数量(无/多)和参与者感知的权力水平(低/平等/高),以检查参与者在后续回复中使用的短信体数量与他们所看到的短信体数量相比情况。主要结果表明:(1)参与者适度趋同于使用相似数量的短信体;(2)那些权力低且看到很多短信体的人在后续回复中更有可能自己使用短信体。通过对短信中的调适行为进行考察,学者们能够更好地理解用户在哪些情境下会在数字交流中使用短信体来有意传达非言语意义和情感。

相似文献

1
Communication accommodation in text messages: Exploring liking, power, and sex as predictors of textisms.短信中的交际顺应:探究好感、权力和性别作为短信体预测因素的情况。
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(4):474-490. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1421895. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
2
Nonverbal channel use in communication of emotion: how may depend on why.非言语通道在情感交流中的运用:取决于为何运用。
Emotion. 2011 Jun;11(3):603-17. doi: 10.1037/a0023164.
3
Interpersonal Communication Motives for Flirting Face to Face and Through Texting.面对面和通过短信进行调情的人际沟通动机。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Apr;21(4):229-233. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0608.
4
Exploring the relationships between the use of text message language and the literacy skills of dyslexic and normal students.探究短信语言使用与诵读困难学生和正常学生读写能力之间的关系。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):423-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.026. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
5
Nonverbal sensitivity in medical students: implications for clinical interactions.医学生的非言语敏感性:对临床互动的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Nov;24(11):1217-22. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1107-5. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
6
Exploring the relationship between children's knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy outcomes.探究儿童对短信缩写知识与学校读写能力成果之间的关系。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2009 Mar;27(Pt 1):145-61. doi: 10.1348/026151008x320507.
7
Patient-clinician mobile communication: analyzing text messaging between adolescents with asthma and nurse case managers.患者与临床医生的移动通讯:分析哮喘青少年与护士病例管理员之间的短信交流
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Jan;21(1):62-9. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0359. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
8
Mad or mad-mad: conveying subtle emotion with face emoji.疯狂还是抓狂:用表情符号传达微妙情感。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 28;14:1183299. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183299. eCollection 2023.
9
Evaluating the Adequacy of Emoji Use in Positive and Negative Messages from Close and Distant Senders.评估亲密和疏远的发件人在积极和消极信息中使用表情符号的适当性。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Mar;25(3):194-199. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2021.0157. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
Exploring the longitudinal relationships between the use of grammar in text messaging and performance on grammatical tasks.探讨短信中语法使用与语法任务表现之间的纵向关系。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2014 Nov;32(4):415-29. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12049. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
How authority affects social evaluations of negotiation words.权威如何影响对谈判用词的社会评价。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Sep 1;10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00669-8.
2
BERTs of a feather: Studying inter- and intra-group communication via information theory and language models.物以类聚:通过信息论和语言模型研究组内和组间的沟通。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3140-3160. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02267-2. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
Interlocutors' Age Impacts Teenagers' Online Writing Style: Accommodation in Intra- and Intergenerational Online Conversations.
对话者的年龄会影响青少年的网络写作风格:代内和代际网络对话中的顺应现象。
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Aug 30;4:738278. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.738278. eCollection 2021.
4
Do New Romantic Couples Use More Similar Language Over Time? Evidence from Intensive Longitudinal Text Messages.随着时间的推移,新的浪漫情侣会使用更相似的语言吗?来自密集纵向短信的证据。
J Commun. 2021 Mar 29;71(3):454-477. doi: 10.1093/joc/jqab012. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Communication Surrounding Estrangement: Stereotypes, Attitudes, and (Non)Accommodation Strategies.围绕疏远的沟通:刻板印象、态度及(非)适应策略。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2018 Oct 20;8(10):96. doi: 10.3390/bs8100096.