• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验评估丙酸氯倍他索 0.05%治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效。

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of clobetasol propionate 0.05% in the treatment of oral lichen planus.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, CIR-Dental School, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Unit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service ASL TO3, Grugliasco, Italy.

出版信息

Oral Dis. 2018 Jul;24(5):772-777. doi: 10.1111/odi.12821. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1111/odi.12821
PMID:29297958
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To perform a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, with a follow-up period of 6 months, for the use of topical clobetasol in cases of symptomatic oral lichen planus (OLP).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two participants were analyzed, with the aims of: (I) to compare the usefulness of topically applied clobetasol propionate 0.05% (mixed with 4% hydroxyethyl cellulose gel) and 4% hydroxyethyl cellulose gel alone (considered as placebo) in the management of OLP; (II) to describe which of them is quicker in decreasing signs and reported symptoms, and (III) which is able to give the proper longer remission in the follow-up.

RESULTS

Symptoms improved in all clobetasol-treated patients during the first 2 months of therapy, while only 50% of placebo control group (p = .005) displayed similar results; of the remaining half, 12.5% did experienced a worsening while 37.5% remained stable. Regarding clinical signs, 87.5% of clobetasol-treated patients improved, while only 62.5% of the placebo-treated patients had a positive response (p = .229).

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to report that clobetasol, at this dosage, has been more effective than a placebo at provoking symptoms improvement in subjects affected by atrophic-erosive oral lesions.

摘要

目的

进行一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究,随访期为 6 个月,评估局部应用氯倍他索治疗有症状的口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)的效果。

受试者和方法

共分析了 32 名参与者,旨在:(I)比较局部应用氯倍他索丙酸酯 0.05%(与 4%羟乙基纤维素凝胶混合)和单独使用 4%羟乙基纤维素凝胶(作为安慰剂)在 OLP 治疗中的有效性;(II)描述它们中哪一种能更快地减轻症状和报告的症状;(III)在随访中哪一种能提供更长时间的适当缓解。

结果

在治疗的前 2 个月,所有接受氯倍他索治疗的患者的症状都有所改善,而安慰剂对照组只有 50%(p=0.005)显示出类似的结果;其余一半中,12.5%的患者病情恶化,而 37.5%的患者病情稳定。关于临床体征,87.5%的接受氯倍他索治疗的患者得到改善,而只有 62.5%的接受安慰剂治疗的患者有积极反应(p=0.229)。

结论

可以报告说,在这种剂量下,氯倍他索在引起萎缩性糜烂性口腔病变患者的症状改善方面比安慰剂更有效。

相似文献

1
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of clobetasol propionate 0.05% in the treatment of oral lichen planus.随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验评估丙酸氯倍他索 0.05%治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效。
Oral Dis. 2018 Jul;24(5):772-777. doi: 10.1111/odi.12821. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
Topical corticosteroids in association with miconazole and chlorhexidine in the long-term management of atrophic-erosive oral lichen planus: a placebo-controlled and comparative study between clobetasol and fluocinonide.外用皮质类固醇联合咪康唑和氯己定用于萎缩糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的长期管理:氯倍他索与氟轻松的安慰剂对照及对比研究
Oral Dis. 1999 Jan;5(1):44-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.1999.tb00063.x.
3
Ciclosporin vs. clobetasol in the topical management of atrophic and erosive oral lichen planus: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.环孢素与氯倍他索在萎缩性糜烂性口腔扁平苔藓局部治疗中的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Jan;154(1):139-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06920.x.
4
Topical clobetasol in the treatment of atrophic-erosive oral lichen planus: a randomized controlled trial to compare two preparations with different concentrations.外用氯倍他索治疗萎缩糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓:一项比较两种不同浓度制剂的随机对照试验
J Oral Pathol Med. 2009 Feb;38(2):227-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2008.00688.x. Epub 2008 Dec 26.
5
Efficacy of photobiomodulation on oral lichen planus: a protocol study for a double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial.光生物调节疗法治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效:一项双盲随机对照临床试验的方案研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 8;8(10):e024083. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024083.
6
A new delivery system of clobetasol-17-propionate (lipid-loaded microspheres 0.025%) compared with a conventional formulation (lipophilic ointment in a hydrophilic phase 0.025%) in topical treatment of atrophic/erosive oral lichen planus. A Phase IV, randomized, observer-blinded, parallel group clinical trial.一种新的丙酸氯倍他索递送系统(0.025%载脂微球)与传统制剂(亲水性基质中含0.025%亲脂性软膏)用于萎缩性/糜烂性口腔扁平苔藓局部治疗的比较。一项IV期、随机、观察者盲法、平行组临床试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2004 May;150(5):984-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05943.x.
7
A comparative treatment study of topical tacrolimus and clobetasol in oral lichen planus.外用他克莫司与丙酸氯倍他索治疗口腔扁平苔藓的对比研究。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Feb;105(2):187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.029.
8
Miconazole as adjuvant therapy for oral lichen planus: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.咪康唑作为口腔扁平苔藓的辅助治疗:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Jun;156(6):1336-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07883.x.
9
Efficacy of topical mesalazine compared with clobetasol propionate in treatment of symptomatic oral lichen planus.局部用美沙拉嗪与丙酸氯倍他索治疗有症状口腔扁平苔藓的疗效比较
Oral Dis. 1998 Dec;4(4):255-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.1998.tb00289.x.
10
Double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial with clobetasol propionate in desquamative gingivitis.
Braz Dent J. 2009;20(3):231-6. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000300011.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the efficacy of topical interventions for pain management in oral lichen planus: a time-stratified bayesian network analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较局部干预措施对口腔扁平苔藓疼痛管理的疗效:一项随机对照试验的时间分层贝叶斯网络分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):962. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06120-0.
2
Impact of Topical Fluocinonide on Oral Lichen Planus Evolution: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.外用氟轻松对口腔扁平苔藓病情演变的影响:随机对照临床试验。
Oral Dis. 2025 Feb;31(2):510-521. doi: 10.1111/odi.15156. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
3
Intra-lesional Corticosteroids Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
病灶内注射皮质类固醇与富血小板血浆及富血小板纤维蛋白治疗口腔扁平苔藓的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e69973. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69973. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Efficacy and safety of topical clobetasol propionate in comparison with alternative treatments in oral lichen planus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.与其他治疗方法相比,外用丙酸氯倍他索治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效和安全性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 24;11:1391754. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1391754. eCollection 2024.
5
Integrative Approaches for the Diagnosis and Management of Erosive Oral Lichen Planus.糜烂性口腔扁平苔藓诊断与管理的综合方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 26;14(7):692. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14070692.
6
Photobiomodulation versus corticosteroid in the management of erosive oral lichen planus: a randomized controlled clinical trial.光生物调节与皮质类固醇治疗糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的疗效比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 17;24(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03976-6.
7
Effectiveness of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.注射用富血小板纤维蛋白治疗口腔扁平苔藓的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 3;16(1):e51626. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51626. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Interventions for the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.口腔扁平苔藓治疗干预措施的比较疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 7;12(8):2763. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082763.
9
Synergistic Efficacy of Plaque Control with Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection on Erosive Non-Gingival Oral Lichen Planus: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.局部注射曲安奈德对糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的协同疗效:一项随机对照临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 23;19(21):13787. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113787.
10
Outcome and long-term treatment protocol for topical tacrolimus in oral lichen planus.口腔扁平苔藓外用他克莫司的疗效及长期治疗方案。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Dec;36(12):2459-2465. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18457. Epub 2022 Aug 3.