Brasseur Sophie M J M, Reijnders Peter J H, Cremer Jenny, Meesters Erik, Kirkwood Roger, Jensen Lasse Fast, Jeβ Armin, Galatius Anders, Teilmann Jonas, Aarts Geert
Wageningen Marine Research, Wageningen University & Research, Den Helder, the Netherlands.
Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 3;13(1):e0189674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189674. eCollection 2018.
Terrestrial and marine wildlife populations have been severely reduced by hunting, fishing and habitat destruction, especially in the last centuries. Although management regulations have led to the recovery of some populations, the underlying processes are not always well understood. This study uses a 40-year time series of counts of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) in the Wadden Sea to study these processes, and demonstrates the influence of historical regional differences in management regimes on the recovery of this population. While the Wadden Sea is considered one ecologically coupled zone, with a distinct harbour seal population, the area is divided into four geo-political regions i.e. the Netherlands, Lower Saxony including Hamburg, Schleswig-Holstein and Denmark. Gradually, seal hunting was banned between 1962 and 1977 in the different regions. Counts of moulting harbour seals and pup counts, obtained during aerial surveys between 1974 and 2014, show a population growth from approximately 4500 to 39,000 individuals. Population growth models were developed to assess if population growth differed between regions, taking into account two Phocine Distemper Virus (PDV) epizootics, in 1988 and 2002 which seriously affected the population. After a slow start prior to the first epizootic, the overall population grew exponentially at rates close to assumed maximum rates of increase in a harbour seal population. Recently, growth slowed down, potentially indicative of approaching carrying capacity. Regional differences in growth rates were demonstrated, with the highest recovery in Netherlands after the first PDV epizootic (i.e. 17.9%), suggesting that growth was fuelled by migration from the other regions, where growth remained at or below the intrinsic growth rate (13%). The seals' distribution changed, and although the proportion of seals counted in the German regions declined, they remained by far the most important pupping region, with approximately 70% of all pups being born there. It is hypothesised that differences in hunting regime, preceding the protection in the 1960's and 1970's, created unbalance in the distribution of breeding females throughout the Wadden Sea, which prevailed for decades. Breeding site fidelity promoted the growth in pup numbers at less affected breeding sites, while recolonisation of new breeding areas would be suppressed by the philopatry displayed by the animals born there. This study shows that for long-lived species, variable management regimes in this case hunting regulations, across a species' range can drive population dynamics for several generations.
陆地和海洋野生动物种群数量因捕猎、捕鱼和栖息地破坏而大幅减少,尤其是在过去几个世纪。尽管管理规定已促使一些种群数量得以恢复,但其中的潜在过程并不总是被充分理解。本研究利用瓦登海海豹(Phoca vitulina)40年的数量统计时间序列来研究这些过程,并证明了历史上区域管理制度差异对该种群恢复的影响。虽然瓦登海被视为一个生态耦合区,拥有独特的海豹种群,但该区域被划分为四个地缘政治区域,即荷兰、包括汉堡在内的下萨克森州、石勒苏益格 - 荷尔斯泰因州和丹麦。在不同区域,海豹捕猎在1962年至1977年间逐渐被禁止。1974年至2014年期间空中调查获得的正在换毛的海豹数量和幼崽数量统计显示,海豹种群数量从约4500只增长到39000只。考虑到1988年和2002年两次严重影响该种群的海豹瘟热病毒(PDV) epizootics,建立了种群增长模型来评估不同区域的种群增长是否存在差异。在第一次 epizootic 之前增长缓慢,之后总体种群数量呈指数增长,增长率接近假定的海豹种群最大增长率。最近,增长放缓,这可能表明接近承载能力。研究表明了增长率的区域差异,第一次PDV epizootic后荷兰的恢复率最高(即17.9%),这表明增长是由其他区域的海豹迁入推动的,而其他区域的增长仍维持在或低于内在增长率(13%)。海豹的分布发生了变化,尽管在德国区域统计的海豹比例下降,但德国区域仍是迄今为止最重要的繁殖区域,约70%的幼崽在那里出生。据推测,20世纪60年代和70年代实施保护之前的捕猎制度差异,导致了整个瓦登海繁殖雌性海豹分布失衡,这种失衡持续了数十年。繁殖地忠诚度促进了受影响较小的繁殖地幼崽数量的增长,而新繁殖区域的重新定殖则会受到在那里出生的动物表现出的恋巢性的抑制。这项研究表明,对于长寿物种而言,在这种情况下即跨物种分布范围内不同的管理制度(捕猎规定),可以驱动种群动态变化持续几代。