Eichhorn J H
Department of Anaesthesia, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anesthesiology. 1989 Apr;70(4):572-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198904000-00002.
Among 1,001,000 ASA Physical Status I and II patients (a subset of the 1,329,000 anesthetics administered from 1976 through mid-1988 in the nine component hospitals of the Harvard Department of Anaesthesia), there were 11 major intraoperative accidents solely attributable to anesthesia (five deaths, four cases of permanent CNS damage, and two cardiac arrests with eventual recovery) among the 70 cases reported to the insurance carrier. Review of these accidents revealed that unrecognized hypoventilation was the most common cause (seven cases). These seven accidents and one other due to discontinuation of inspired oxygen in all likelihood would have been prevented by appropriate response to earlier warnings generated by the "safety monitoring" principles mandated by the Harvard minimal monitoring standards. Analysis suggests capnography (although not mandated) would be the best monitor of ventilation. An important associated issue was the apparent inadequacy of supervision of residents and C.R.N.A.s. The eight preventable accidents represent 88% of the projected insurance payout. Only one accident occurred after the 1985 adoption of the standards (in the month following their implementation). From that time through mid-1988, there have been 319,000 anesthetics without a major preventable intraoperative injury. Although not statistically significant, the accident rate in the target population of healthy people is reduced more than threefold. This and the case analyses support the contention that nearly all the inevitable mishaps (technical or from errors in judgement) that occur during anesthesia can be identified through safety monitoring early enough to prevent most major patient injuries. This improved clinical outcome should lessen the medical-legal and malpractice insurance burdens of anesthesiologists.
在100.1万名美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况I级和II级的患者中(这是1976年至1988年年中在哈佛麻醉系的九家组成医院实施的132.9万例麻醉中的一个子集),向保险公司报告的70例病例中有11例主要术中事故完全归因于麻醉(5例死亡、4例永久性中枢神经系统损伤以及2例心脏骤停最终恢复)。对这些事故的审查显示,未被识别的通气不足是最常见的原因(7例)。这7起事故以及另外1起因吸入氧气中断导致的事故,很可能通过对哈佛最低监测标准所规定的“安全监测”原则产生的早期警告做出适当反应而得以避免。分析表明,二氧化碳描记法(尽管未作规定)将是通气的最佳监测方法。一个重要的相关问题是对住院医生和注册护士麻醉师的监督明显不足。这8起可预防的事故占预计保险赔付的88%。1985年采用这些标准之后仅发生了1起事故(在实施后的那个月)。从那时到1988年年中,有31.9万例麻醉没有发生重大可预防的术中损伤。尽管无统计学意义,但健康人群目标群体中的事故发生率降低了三倍多。这一点以及病例分析支持了这样一种观点,即麻醉期间发生的几乎所有不可避免的不幸事件(技术方面或判断失误)都能够通过安全监测尽早识别出来,以防止大多数重大患者损伤。这种改善的临床结果应会减轻麻醉医生的医疗法律和医疗事故保险负担。