• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

居家医疗患者的不良事件:使用触发工具方法进行的回顾性记录审查

Adverse events in patients in home healthcare: a retrospective record review using trigger tool methodology.

作者信息

Schildmeijer Kristina Görel Ingegerd, Unbeck Maria, Ekstedt Mirjam, Lindblad Marléne, Nilsson Lena

机构信息

Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.

Department of Orthopaedics, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 3;8(1):e019267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019267.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019267
PMID:29301764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5781156/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Home healthcare is an increasingly common part of healthcare. The patients are often aged, frail and have multiple diseases, and multiple caregivers are involved in their treatment. This study explores the origin, incidence, types and preventability of adverse events (AEs) that occur in patients receiving home healthcare.

DESIGN

A study using retrospective record review and trigger tool methodology.

SETTING AND METHODS

Ten teams with experience of home healthcare from nine regions across Sweden reviewed home healthcare records in a two-stage procedure using 38 predefined triggers in four modules. A random sample of records from 600 patients (aged 18 years or older) receiving home healthcare during 2015 were reviewed.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The cumulative incidence of AEs found in patients receiving home healthcare; secondary measures were origin, types, severity of harm and preventability of the AEs.

RESULTS

The patients were aged 20-79 years, 280 men and 320 women. The review teams identified 356 AEs in 226 (37.7%; 95% CI 33.0 to 42.8) of the home healthcare records. Of these, 255 (71.6%; 95% CI 63.2 to 80.8) were assessed as being preventable, and most (246, 69.1%; 95% CI 60.9 to 78.2) required extra healthcare visits or led to a prolonged period of healthcare. Most of the AEs (271, 76.1%; 95% CI 67.5 to 85.6) originated in home healthcare; the rest were detected during home healthcare but were related to care outside home healthcare. The most common AEs were healthcare-associated infections, falls and pressure ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

AEs in patients receiving home healthcare are common, mostly preventable and often cause temporary harm requiring extra healthcare resources. The most frequent types of AEs must be addressed and reduced through improvements in interprofessional collaboration. This is an important area for future studies.

摘要

目的

居家医疗保健日益成为医疗保健的常见组成部分。患者往往年事已高、身体虚弱且患有多种疾病,治疗过程涉及多名护理人员。本研究探讨接受居家医疗保健的患者发生不良事件(AE)的起源、发生率、类型及可预防性。

设计

一项采用回顾性记录审查和触发工具方法的研究。

设置与方法

来自瑞典九个地区的十个有居家医疗保健经验的团队分两个阶段审查居家医疗保健记录,使用四个模块中的38个预定义触发因素。对2015年期间接受居家医疗保健的600名(18岁及以上)患者的记录进行随机抽样审查。

主要和次要结局指标

接受居家医疗保健的患者中发现的不良事件的累积发生率;次要指标为不良事件的起源、类型及严重程度和可预防性。

结果

患者年龄在20至79岁之间,男性280名,女性320名。审查团队在226份(37.7%;95%可信区间33.0至42.8)居家医疗保健记录中识别出356起不良事件。其中,255起(71.6%;95%可信区间63.2至80.8)被评估为可预防的,且大多数(246起,69.1%;95%可信区间60.9至78.2)需要额外的医疗就诊或导致医疗保健时间延长。大多数不良事件(271起,76.1%;95%可信区间67.5至85.6)起源于居家医疗保健;其余的是在居家医疗保健期间被发现,但与居家医疗保健之外的护理有关。最常见的不良事件是医疗相关感染、跌倒和压疮。

结论

接受居家医疗保健的患者发生不良事件很常见,大多可预防,且常造成需要额外医疗资源的暂时性伤害。必须通过改善跨专业协作来处理和减少最常见的不良事件类型。这是未来研究的一个重要领域。

相似文献

1
Adverse events in patients in home healthcare: a retrospective record review using trigger tool methodology.居家医疗患者的不良事件:使用触发工具方法进行的回顾性记录审查
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 3;8(1):e019267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019267.
2
Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and no-harm incidents that affect patients admitted to home healthcare.开发一种触发工具,以识别影响到接受家庭医疗保健患者的不良事件和无伤害事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):502-511. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
3
Incidence of adverse events in Sweden during 2013-2016: a cohort study describing the implementation of a national trigger tool.2013 - 2016年瑞典不良事件的发生率:一项描述国家触发工具实施情况的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e020833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020833.
4
The incidence of adverse events among home care patients.居家护理患者不良事件的发生率。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Feb;25(1):16-28. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs075. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
5
Exploring nursing-sensitive events in home healthcare: A national multicenter cohort study using a trigger tool.探索居家医疗中的护理敏感事件:一项使用触发工具的全国多中心队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Feb;138:104434. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104434. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
6
Identifying no-harm incidents in home healthcare: a cohort study using trigger tool methodology.识别家庭医疗保健中的无伤害事件:使用触发工具方法的队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05139-z.
7
Adverse events in psychiatry: a national cohort study in Sweden with a unique psychiatric trigger tool.精神病学中的不良事件:瑞典一项具有独特精神科触发工具的全国队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2447-2.
8
Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events.验证触发因素并开发用于识别不良事件的儿科触发工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:655. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0655-5.
9
Characteristics associated with the occurrence of adverse events: a retrospective medical record review using the Global Trigger Tool in a fully digitalized tertiary teaching hospital in Korea.与不良事件发生相关的特征:使用全球触发工具对韩国一家完全数字化的三级教学医院进行回顾性病历审查。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;20(1):27-35. doi: 10.1111/jep.12075. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
10
The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events - a scoping review.住院不良事件的发生率、类型、后果及可预防性——一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3335-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Healthcare Visual Map Tool for Health Workers to Improve Quality of Life of Home Care Patients: Study Protocol.为医护人员设计、实施和评估改善居家护理患者生活质量的医疗可视化地图工具:研究方案。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;13(6):626. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060626.
2
Caregiving risk perception characteristics and associated factors among informal caregivers of functionally dependent elderly individuals at home: a qualitative study.居家功能依赖老年人非正式照料者的照护风险认知特征及相关因素:一项定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 7;23(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02211-5.
3
Capturing Home Care Information Management and Communication Processes Among Caregivers of Older Adults: Qualitative Study to Inform Technology Design.获取老年人照顾者的家庭护理信息管理与沟通流程:为技术设计提供信息的定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 4;8:e53289. doi: 10.2196/53289.
4
"Being the main character but not always involved in one's own care transition" - a qualitative descriptive study of older adults' experiences of being discharged from in-patient care to home.“身为主角却并非总是参与自身的照护过渡”——一项关于老年人从住院护理出院回家经历的质性描述性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 2;24(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11039-3.
5
Exploring Norwegian homecare healthcare professionals' perceptions of risk and the link to high-quality care: a qualitative multiple case study.探索挪威家庭保健医护专业人员对风险的认知与高质量护理之间的联系:一项定性多案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):e080769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080769.
6
Exploring homecare leaders' risk perception and the link to resilience and adaptive capacity: a multiple case study.探索家庭护理领导者的风险感知及其与弹性和适应能力的联系:一项多案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10808-4.
7
Quality of care as perceived by caregivers and residents in aged care homes in Sri Lanka: a qualitative study.斯里兰卡老年护理院中护理人员和居民所感知的护理质量:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 27;24(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04721-y.
8
The Association of Organizational, Environmental, and Staffing Characteristics of Residential Care Facilities and the Risk Rating of Statutory Notifications: A Cross-Sectional Study in Ireland.爱尔兰的一项横断研究:居住护理机构的组织、环境和人员配备特征与法定通知风险评级之间的关联。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Mar 1;20(2):131-137. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001185. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
9
Adverse drug events in Chinese elder inpatients: a retrospective review for evaluating the efficiency of the Global Trigger Tool.中国老年住院患者的药物不良事件:一项评估全球触发工具有效性的回顾性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 28;10:1232334. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1232334. eCollection 2023.
10
Advancing Subcutaneous Dosing Regimens for Biotherapeutics: Clinical Strategies for Expedited Market Access.推进生物疗法的皮下给药方案:加速市场准入的临床策略。
BioDrugs. 2024 Jan;38(1):23-46. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00626-1. Epub 2023 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and no-harm incidents that affect patients admitted to home healthcare.开发一种触发工具,以识别影响到接受家庭医疗保健患者的不良事件和无伤害事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):502-511. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
2
The application of the Global Trigger Tool: a systematic review.全球触发工具的应用:一项系统评价
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Dec 1;28(6):640-649. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw115.
3
Preventable Adverse Events in Surgical Care in Sweden: A Nationwide Review of Patient Notes.瑞典外科护理中可预防的不良事件:对患者病历的全国性回顾。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(11):e3047. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003047.
4
Monitoring adverse events in Norwegian hospitals from 2010 to 2013.2010年至2013年挪威医院不良事件监测
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 30;5(12):e008576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008576.
5
Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events.验证触发因素并开发用于识别不良事件的儿科触发工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:655. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0655-5.
6
Assessing adverse events among home care clients in three Canadian provinces using chart review.使用图表回顾评估三个加拿大省份的家庭护理客户中的不良事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):989-97. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002039. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
7
Adverse events among Ontario home care clients associated with emergency room visit or hospitalization: a retrospective cohort study.安大略省家庭护理客户中与急诊就诊或住院相关的不良事件:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 22;13:227. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-227.
8
Assessment of the global trigger tool to measure, monitor and evaluate patient safety in cancer patients: reliability concerns are raised.评估全球触发工具以衡量、监测和评估癌症患者的患者安全:可靠性令人担忧。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jul;22(7):571-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001219. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
9
Description and evaluation of adaptations to the global trigger tool to enhance value to adverse event reduction efforts.描述和评估对全球触发工具的调整,以增强对减少不良事件工作的价值。
J Patient Saf. 2013 Jun;9(2):87-95. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e31827cdc3b.
10
The incidence of adverse events among home care patients.居家护理患者不良事件的发生率。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Feb;25(1):16-28. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs075. Epub 2013 Jan 2.