Silva Karine Câmara, Zenóbio Elton Gonçalves, Souza Paulo Eduardo Alencar, Soares Rodrigo Villamarim, Cosso Maurício Greco, Horta Martinho Campolina Rebello
Graduate Program in Dentistry, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
J Oral Implantol. 2018 Apr;44(2):109-113. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00094. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
This study aimed to compare the primary and secondary stability, measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA), in implants of different lengths installed in areas submitted to maxillary sinus lift. Correlation between RFA and implant insertion torque was also assessed. Twenty implants of 9 and 11 mm were inserted in areas submitted to maxillary sinus lift. The insertion torque was measured by the Bien Air motor. Osstell, through RFA, determined the implant stability quotient (ISQ) 2 times: the day of implant installation (T1) and 90 days after implant installation (T2). No differences were observed in the ISQ between T1 and T2 when the 20 implants were grouped, nor when the 9 mm implants were evaluated separately. In contrast, when the 11 mm values were evaluated separately, the ISQ was significantly higher in T2 than in T1 ( P < .05). In T1, 9 mm implants had a higher ISQ than 11 mm ones ( P < .05), whereas in T2, the implants of 11 mm showed a higher ISQ than did the 9 mm implants ( P < .05). There was no difference in insertion torque between 9 and 11 mm implants ( P > .05), nor was there a correlation between ISQ and insertion torque ( P > .05). In conclusion, longer implants (11 mm) presented a significant increase in ISQ values during the healing period when installed in areas previously submitted to maxillary sinus lift. This phenomenon was not observed for shorter implants (9 mm). Finally, no correlation was observed between ISQ and insertion torque.
本研究旨在比较通过共振频率分析(RFA)测量的,在上颌窦提升区域植入的不同长度种植体的初期稳定性和二期稳定性。同时还评估了RFA与种植体植入扭矩之间的相关性。将20颗9毫米和11毫米的种植体植入上颌窦提升区域。使用Bien Air马达测量植入扭矩。通过RFA,Osstell在种植体植入当天(T1)和植入后90天(T2)两次测定种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)。当将20颗种植体分组时,T1和T2之间的ISQ没有差异,单独评估9毫米种植体时也没有差异。相反,当单独评估11毫米种植体的值时,T2时的ISQ显著高于T1(P <.05)。在T1时,9毫米种植体的ISQ高于11毫米种植体(P <.05),而在T2时,11毫米种植体的ISQ高于9毫米种植体(P <.05)。9毫米和11毫米种植体之间的植入扭矩没有差异(P>.05),ISQ与植入扭矩之间也没有相关性(P>.05)。总之,较长的种植体(11毫米)在植入先前进行过上颌窦提升的区域时,在愈合期ISQ值显著增加。较短的种植体(9毫米)未观察到这种现象。最后,未观察到ISQ与植入扭矩之间的相关性。