Response: "A Propensity Score-matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands".
作者信息
Seesing Maarten F J, Wijnhoven Bas P L
机构信息
University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht, the Netherlands Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
出版信息
Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):e75-e76. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002644.
PMID:29303804
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Response: "A Propensity Score-matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands".回应：“荷兰开放性与微创经胸食管切除术的倾向评分匹配分析”
Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):e75-e76. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002644.
2
Comment on: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.评论：荷兰开放性与微创经胸食管切除术的倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):e74-e75. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002642.
3
Response to the Comment on "A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands".对《荷兰开放性与微创性经胸食管切除术的倾向评分匹配分析》评论的回应
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):e56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002869.
4
Comment on "A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands".对《荷兰开放性与微创经胸食管癌切除术的倾向评分匹配分析》的评论
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):e55-e56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002868.
5
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术的短期疗效：倾向评分匹配分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May 23;13(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0727-4.
6
Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.机器人辅助与电视胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结评估：一项倾向评分匹配分析
World J Surg. 2018 Feb;42(2):590-598. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4179-0.
7
Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.根治性食管切除术治疗食管鳞癌的疗效、生活质量和生存率：手术方式的倾向评分匹配比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.063. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
8
Comparison of single- and multi-incision minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for treating esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched study.单切口与多切口微创食管癌切除术（MIE）治疗食管癌的比较：一项倾向评分匹配研究
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2925-2931. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5308-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
9
Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival.在发病率、死亡率和生存率方面，开放性经胸或经裂孔食管切除术与微创食管切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2006 Nov;20(11):1681-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0009-4. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
10
Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis.胸腔镜与杂交食管切除术的早期结果：倾向评分匹配的比较分析
Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):1073-81. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
Zotero 插件