National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Am J Infect Control. 2018 May;46(5):512-519. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.021. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
There is limited research on the importance of implementation when evaluating the effect of hand hygiene interventions in school settings in developed countries. The aim of this study was to examine the association between an implementation index and the effect of the intervention. The Hi Five Intervention was evaluated in a 3-armed cluster randomized controlled trial involving 43 randomly selected Danish schools.
Analyses investigating the association between implementation of the Hi Five Intervention and infectious illness days, infectious illness episodes, illness-related absenteeism, and hand hygiene were carried out in a multilevel model (school, class, and child).
The level of implementation was associated with hand hygiene and potentially associated with number of infectious illness days and infectious illness episodes among children. This association was not found for illness-related absenteeism.
Classes that succeeded in achieving a high level of implementation of the Hi Five Intervention had a lower number of infectious illness days and infectious illness episodes, suggesting that the Hi Five Intervention, if implemented adequately, may be relevant as a tool to decrease infectious illness in a Danish school setting.
在评估发达国家学校环境中手卫生干预措施效果时,实施情况的重要性研究有限。本研究旨在检验实施指数与干预效果之间的关联。Hi Five 干预措施在一项涉及 43 所随机选择的丹麦学校的 3 臂整群随机对照试验中进行了评估。
在一个多层次模型(学校、班级和儿童)中,进行了分析以调查 Hi Five 干预措施的实施情况与传染病日、传染病发作、与疾病相关的缺勤和手卫生之间的关联。
实施水平与手卫生有关,并且可能与儿童的传染病日和传染病发作数量有关。然而,这种关联在与疾病相关的缺勤方面没有被发现。
成功实现 Hi Five 干预措施高度实施的班级传染病日和传染病发作数量较少,这表明如果 Hi Five 干预措施得到充分实施,可能是减少丹麦学校传染病的一种相关工具。