Denbæk Anne Maj, Andersen Anette, Bonnesen Camilla Thørring, Laursen Bjarne, Ersbøll Annette Kjær, Due Pernille, Johansen Anette
From the National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5 A, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 Jan;37(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001686.
Previous school-based hand hygiene interventions have reported to successfully reduce infectious illness among schoolchildren. But few studies have tested the effect in large populations with adequate statistical power and analyses. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a school-based multicomponent intervention to improve handwashing among schoolchildren, the Hi Five study, succeeded in reducing infectious illness and illness-related absenteeism in schools.
The Hi Five study was a three-armed cluster-randomized controlled trial involving 43 randomly selected Danish schools; two intervention arms involving 14 schools each, and 15 control schools. Infectious illness days, infectious illness episodes and illness-related absenteeism were estimated in multilevel regressions, based on available cases of text messages answered by parents and based on questionnaire data reported by schoolchildren, respectively.
At follow-up, children in the intervention schools did not differ from the control schools in number of illness days [odds ratio (OR)I-arm I: 0.91 (0.77-1.07) and ORI-arm II: 0.94 (0.79-1.12)] and illness episodes [ORI-arm I: 0.95 (0.81-1.11) and ORI-arm II: 0.98 (0.84-1.16)] or in reporting illness-related absenteeism [ORI-arm I: 1.09 (0.83-1.43) & ORI-arm II: 1.06 (0.81-1.40)].
The multicomponent Hi Five intervention achieved no difference in the number of illness days, illness episodes or illness-related absenteeism among children in intervention schools compared with control schools. It is noteworthy that one of the main components in the intervention, a mandatory daily handwashing before lunch, was only implemented by 1 of 3 of teachers in intervention schools.
以往基于学校的手卫生干预措施据报道成功减少了学童中的传染病。但很少有研究在具有足够统计效力和分析的大样本人群中测试其效果。本研究的目的是评估一项以学校为基础的多成分干预措施,即“击掌”研究,是否成功减少了学校中的传染病和与疾病相关的缺勤率。
“击掌”研究是一项三臂整群随机对照试验,涉及43所随机选择的丹麦学校;两个干预组各有14所学校,15所对照学校。分别根据家长回复短信的可用病例以及学童报告的问卷数据,在多水平回归中估计传染病天数、传染病发作次数和与疾病相关的缺勤率。
随访时,干预学校的儿童在患病天数[比值比(OR),干预组I:0.91(0.77 - 1.07),干预组II:0.94(0.79 - 1.12)]、发病次数[干预组I:0.95(0.81 - 1.11),干预组II:0.98(0.84 - 1.16)]或报告与疾病相关的缺勤率[干预组I:1.09(0.83 - 1.43),干预组II:1.06(0.81 - 1.40)]方面与对照学校没有差异。
与对照学校相比,多成分的“击掌”干预措施在干预学校儿童的患病天数、发病次数或与疾病相关的缺勤率方面没有差异。值得注意的是,干预措施的主要组成部分之一,即午餐前强制每日洗手,在干预学校中只有三分之一的教师执行。