BASF Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
BASF Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;92:407-419. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.12.024. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
In vivo acute systemic testing is a regulatory requirement for agrochemical formulations. GHS specifies an alternative computational approach (GHS additivity formula) for calculating the acute toxicity of mixtures. We collected acute systemic toxicity data from formulations that contained one of several acutely-toxic active ingredients. The resulting acute data set includes 210 formulations tested for oral toxicity, 128 formulations tested for inhalation toxicity and 31 formulations tested for dermal toxicity. The GHS additivity formula was applied to each of these formulations and compared with the experimental in vivo result. In the acute oral assay, the GHS additivity formula misclassified 110 formulations using the GHS classification criteria (48% accuracy) and 119 formulations using the USEPA classification criteria (43% accuracy). With acute inhalation, the GHS additivity formula misclassified 50 formulations using the GHS classification criteria (61% accuracy) and 34 formulations using the USEPA classification criteria (73% accuracy). For acute dermal toxicity, the GHS additivity formula misclassified 16 formulations using the GHS classification criteria (48% accuracy) and 20 formulations using the USEPA classification criteria (36% accuracy). This data indicates the acute systemic toxicity of many formulations is not the sum of the ingredients' toxicity (additivity); but rather, ingredients in a formulation can interact to result in lower or higher toxicity than predicted by the GHS additivity formula.
体内急性系统测试是农用化学品制剂的法规要求。GHS 指定了一种替代的计算方法(GHS 加和公式),用于计算混合物的急性毒性。我们从含有几种急性毒性有效成分的制剂中收集了急性系统毒性数据。由此产生的急性数据集包括 210 种经口毒性测试的制剂、128 种经吸入毒性测试的制剂和 31 种经皮肤毒性测试的制剂。GHS 加和公式被应用于这些制剂中的每一个,并与体内实验结果进行比较。在急性口服试验中,GHS 加和公式根据 GHS 分类标准错误分类了 110 种制剂(准确率为 48%),根据 USEPA 分类标准错误分类了 119 种制剂(准确率为 43%)。对于急性吸入,GHS 加和公式根据 GHS 分类标准错误分类了 50 种制剂(准确率为 61%),根据 USEPA 分类标准错误分类了 34 种制剂(准确率为 73%)。对于急性皮肤毒性,GHS 加和公式根据 GHS 分类标准错误分类了 16 种制剂(准确率为 48%),根据 USEPA 分类标准错误分类了 20 种制剂(准确率为 36%)。这些数据表明,许多制剂的急性系统毒性不是成分毒性的总和(加和性);而是制剂中的成分可以相互作用,导致毒性低于或高于 GHS 加和公式预测的毒性。