Suppr超能文献

在农用化学品配制品的监管决策中,急性皮肤毒性测试与评估人类健康保护无关。

Non-relevance of acute dermal toxicity testing for assessing human health protection in the regulatory decision-making for agrochemical formulated products.

机构信息

Bayer S.A., Rua Domingos Jorge, 1100, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Corteva, Alameda Itapecuru, 506, Alphaville, Barueri, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;106:105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

Abstract

Compared to oral toxicity tests, dermal toxicity tests offer little or no additional scientific information or public health protection for agrochemical-formulated products (US EPA, 2016). Based on that, a retrospective analysis of the results of acute oral and dermal LD studies of agrochemical products registered in Brazil was carried out by the Technical Group on Toxicological Risk Assessment (GT-ART) of the Brazilian Crop Protection Association (ANDEF). The data were obtained from 6 agrochemical industries that are associated to ANDEF, following these considerations: only rat studies were selected; only paired studies were chosen; only studies performed with top doses ≥2,000 mg/kg were selected; biological products were excluded. The dataset includes 342 formulated products in 21 formulation types. Among these 342 formulated products, 228 have a single active ingredient, 107 have 2 and 7 have 3 or more. The comparison of acute oral to dermal toxicity studies of agrochemical-formulated products registered in Brazil corroborates the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) conclusion on waiving acute dermal toxicity tests, which will result in avoiding unnecessary use of time and resources, data generation costs and animal testing.

摘要

与口服毒性测试相比,经皮毒性测试为农业化学制剂产品提供的科学信息或公共卫生保护很少或没有增加(美国环保署,2016 年)。基于此,巴西作物保护协会(ANDEF)的毒理风险评估技术组(GT-ART)对在巴西注册的农业化学产品的急性口服和经皮 LD 研究结果进行了回顾性分析。这些数据是从与 ANDEF 相关的 6 家农业化学公司获得的,考虑到以下几点:只选择了大鼠研究;只选择了配对研究;只选择了使用 ≥2000mg/kg 的顶剂量进行的研究;排除了生物制品。该数据集包括 21 种制剂类型的 342 种配方产品。在这 342 种配方产品中,有 228 种产品含有单一活性成分,107 种产品含有两种,7 种产品含有三种或更多。巴西注册的农业化学制剂产品的急性口服和经皮毒性研究比较证实了美国环保署(US EPA)关于豁免急性经皮毒性测试的结论,这将避免不必要的时间和资源、数据生成成本和动物测试的使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验