Turk J Med Sci. 2017 Dec 19;47(6):1785-1790. doi: 10.3906/sag-1704-97.
Background/aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided injection versus blind injection of corticosteroids in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Materials and methods: This prospective, randomized clinical trial included patients with severe CTS based on clinical and electrophysiological criteria. The patients were evaluated for clinical and electrophysiological parameters at baseline and 4 weeks after treatment. Symptom severity and hand function were assessed by the Boston questionnaire. The patients underwent blind injection or US-guided injection. Results: When compared with baseline, both groups showed significant improvement in Boston questionnaire scores and all electrophysiological parameters. Significant differences were observed between the groups for clinical parameters (Boston Symptom Severity Scale: P = 0.007; Functional Status Scale: P < 0.001) in favor of the US-guided group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that both US-guided and blind injections were effective in reducing symptoms and improving hand function. US-guided injections may yield more effective clinical results in the short-term than blind injections in the treatment of patients with severe CTS.
背景/目的:本研究旨在比较超声(US)引导注射与皮质类固醇盲注治疗腕管综合征(CTS)的效果。
这是一项前瞻性、随机临床试验,纳入了根据临床和电生理标准诊断为严重 CTS 的患者。患者在基线和治疗后 4 周时接受临床和电生理参数评估。采用波士顿问卷评估症状严重程度和手部功能。患者接受盲注或 US 引导注射。
与基线相比,两组患者的波士顿问卷评分和所有电生理参数均显著改善。US 引导组在临床参数(波士顿症状严重程度量表:P = 0.007;功能状态量表:P < 0.001)方面明显优于盲注组。
本研究表明,US 引导注射和盲注均能有效减轻症状并改善手部功能。与盲注相比,US 引导注射在治疗严重 CTS 患者方面可能具有更短期的更有效的临床效果。