Suppr超能文献

超声引导下腕管综合征的干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析

Ultrasound-Guided Interventions for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

作者信息

Lam King Hei Stanley, Wu Yung-Tsan, Reeves Kenneth Dean, Galluccio Felice, Allam Abdallah El-Sayed, Peng Philip W H

机构信息

The Department of Clinical Research, The Hong Kong Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Hong Kong.

Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;13(6):1138. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061138.

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment, and recently, ultrasound-guided perineural injection (UPIT) and percutaneous flexor retinaculum release (UPCTR) have been utilized to treat CTS. However, no systematic review or meta-analysis has included both intervention types of ultrasound-guided interventions for CTS. Therefore, we performed this review using four databases (i.e., PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane) to evaluate the quality of evidence, effectiveness, and safety of the published studies on ultrasound-guided interventions in CTS. Among sixty studies selected for systemic review, 20 randomized treatment comparison or controlled studies were included in six meta-analyses. Steroid UPIT with ultrasound guidance outperformed that with landmark guidance. UPIT with higher-dose steroids outperformed that with lower-dose steroids. UPIT with 5% dextrose in water (D5W) outperformed control injection and hydrodissection with high-volume D5W was superior to that with low-volume D5W. UPIT with platelet-rich plasma outperformed various control treatments. UPCTR outperformed open surgery in terms of symptom improvement but not functional improvement. No serious adverse events were reported in the studies reviewed. The findings suggest that both UPIT and UPCTR may provide clinically important benefits and appear safe. Further treatment comparison studies are required to determine comparative therapeutic efficacy.

摘要

腕管综合征(CTS)是最常见的周围神经卡压症,近来,超声引导下神经周围注射(UPIT)和经皮屈肌支持带松解术(UPCTR)已被用于治疗CTS。然而,尚无系统评价或荟萃分析同时纳入针对CTS的这两种超声引导干预类型。因此,我们使用四个数据库(即PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus和Cochrane)进行了这项评价,以评估已发表的关于CTS超声引导干预研究的证据质量、有效性和安全性。在筛选出用于系统评价的60项研究中,20项随机治疗比较或对照研究被纳入六项荟萃分析。超声引导下的类固醇UPIT优于 landmark 引导下的UPIT。高剂量类固醇的UPIT优于低剂量类固醇的UPIT。5%葡萄糖溶液(D5W)的UPIT优于对照注射,大容量D5W的水分离术优于小容量D5W的水分离术。富含血小板血浆的UPIT优于各种对照治疗。就症状改善而言,UPCTR优于开放手术,但在功能改善方面则不然。在所审查的研究中未报告严重不良事件。研究结果表明,UPIT和UPCTR都可能提供临床上重要的益处且似乎是安全的。需要进一步的治疗比较研究来确定比较治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c56f/10046938/bb36cae91a36/diagnostics-13-01138-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验