1School of Food and Nutrition,Massey Institute of Food Science and Technology,Massey University,Palmerston North 4442,New Zealand.
3Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences,The University of Auckland,Auckland 1142,New Zealand.
Br J Nutr. 2018 Jan;119(2):176-189. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517003440. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
Dysbiotic gut microbiota have been implicated in human disease. Diet-based therapeutic strategies have been used to manipulate the gut microbiota towards a more favourable profile. However, it has been demonstrated that large inter-individual variability exists in gut microbiota response to a dietary intervention. The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether habitually low dietary fibre (LDF) v. high dietary fibre (HDF) intakes influence gut microbiota response to an inulin-type fructan prebiotic. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, thirty-four healthy participants were classified as LDF or HDF consumers. Gut microbiota composition (16S rRNA bacterial gene sequencing) and SCFA concentrations were assessed following 3 weeks of daily prebiotic supplementation (Orafti® Synergy 1; 16 g/d) or placebo (Glucidex® 29 Premium; 16 g/d), as well as after 3 weeks of the alternative intervention, following a 3-week washout period. In the LDF group, the prebiotic intervention led to an increase in Bifidobacterium (P=0·001). In the HDF group, the prebiotic intervention led to an increase in Bifidobacterium (P<0·001) and Faecalibacterium (P=0·010) and decreases in Coprococcus (P=0·010), Dorea (P=0·043) and Ruminococcus (Lachnospiraceae family) (P=0·032). This study demonstrates that those with HDF intakes have a greater gut microbiota response and are therefore more likely to benefit from an inulin-type fructan prebiotic than those with LDF intakes. Future studies aiming to modulate the gut microbiota and improve host health, using an inulin-type fructan prebiotic, should take habitual dietary fibre intake into account.
肠道菌群失调与人类疾病有关。人们已经采用基于饮食的治疗策略来调节肠道菌群,使其朝着更有利的方向发展。然而,大量研究表明,个体间肠道菌群对饮食干预的反应存在很大差异。本研究的主要目的是研究习惯性低膳食纤维(LDF)与高膳食纤维(HDF)摄入是否会影响肠道菌群对菊粉型果聚糖益生元的反应。在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究中,34 名健康参与者被分为 LDF 或 HDF 消费者。在 3 周的每日益生元补充(Orafti®Synergy 1;16 g/d)或安慰剂(Glucidex®29 Premium;16 g/d)后,以及在 3 周洗脱期后进行替代干预的 3 周后,评估肠道微生物群组成(16S rRNA 细菌基因测序)和 SCFA 浓度。在 LDF 组中,益生元干预导致双歧杆菌增加(P=0·001)。在 HDF 组中,益生元干预导致双歧杆菌(P<0·001)和粪杆菌(P=0·010)增加,粪球菌(P=0·010)、多尔氏菌(P=0·043)和真杆菌(毛螺科)(P=0·032)减少。这项研究表明,HDF 摄入量较高的人肠道菌群反应更大,因此比 LDF 摄入量较高的人更有可能从菊粉型果聚糖益生元中受益。未来旨在使用菊粉型果聚糖益生元调节肠道菌群并改善宿主健康的研究应考虑习惯性膳食纤维摄入量。