Healey Genelle, Brough Louise, Butts Chrissie, Murphy Rinki, Whelan Kevin, Coad Jane
Massey Institute of Food Science and Technology, School of Food and Nutrition, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand Department of Food, Nutrition and Health, Plant and Food Research Limited, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Massey Institute of Food Science and Technology, School of Food and Nutrition, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 2;6(9):e012504. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012504.
The commensal gut microbiota have been shown to have an impact on human health as aberrant gut microbiota have been linked to disease. Dietary constituents are influential in shaping the gut microbiota. Diet-specific therapeutic strategies may therefore play a role in optimising human health via beneficial manipulation of the gut microbiota. Research has suggested that an individual's baseline gut microbiota composition may influence how the gut microbiota respond to a dietary intervention and individuals with differing habitual dietary intakes appear to have distinct baseline gut microbiota compositions. The responsiveness of the gut microbiota may therefore be influenced by habitual dietary intakes. This study aims to investigate what influence differing habitual dietary fibre intakes have on the responsiveness of the gut microbiota to a prebiotic intervention.
In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, single-centre study, 20 low dietary fibre (dietary fibre intake <18 g/day for females and <22 g/day for males) and 20 high dietary fibre (dietary fibre intake ≥25 g/day for females and ≥30 g/day for males) consumers will be recruited. Participants will be randomised to a placebo (Glucidex 29 Premium) or a prebiotic (Synergy 1) intervention for 3 weeks with a 3-week washout followed by 3 weeks of the alternative intervention. Outcome measures of gut microbiota composition (using 16S rRNA gene sequencing) and functional capacity (faecal short chain fatty acid concentrations and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt)) as well as appetite (visual analogue scale appetite questionnaire) will be assessed at the beginning and end of each intervention phase.
The Massey University Human Ethics Committee approved this study (Massey University HEC: Southern A application-15/34). Results will be disseminated through peer-review journal publications, conference presentations and a summary of findings will be distributed to participants.
ACTRN12615000922572; Pre-results.
共生肠道微生物群已被证明会对人类健康产生影响,因为异常的肠道微生物群与疾病有关。饮食成分对塑造肠道微生物群有影响。因此,特定饮食的治疗策略可能通过有益地调控肠道微生物群在优化人类健康方面发挥作用。研究表明,个体的基线肠道微生物群组成可能会影响肠道微生物群对饮食干预的反应,并且具有不同习惯性饮食摄入量的个体似乎有不同的基线肠道微生物群组成。因此,肠道微生物群的反应性可能受习惯性饮食摄入量的影响。本研究旨在调查不同的习惯性膳食纤维摄入量对肠道微生物群对益生元干预反应性的影响。
在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉、单中心研究中,将招募20名低膳食纤维消费者(女性膳食纤维摄入量<18克/天,男性<22克/天)和20名高膳食纤维消费者(女性膳食纤维摄入量≥25克/天,男性≥30克/天)。参与者将被随机分配接受安慰剂(Glucidex 29 Premium)或益生元(Synergy 1)干预3周,随后有3周的洗脱期,然后进行3周的替代干预。在每个干预阶段开始和结束时,将评估肠道微生物群组成(使用16S rRNA基因测序)和功能能力(粪便短链脂肪酸浓度以及通过重建未观察状态进行群落系统发育调查(PICRUSt))以及食欲(视觉模拟量表食欲问卷)。
梅西大学人类伦理委员会批准了本研究(梅西大学HEC:南部A申请-15/34)。研究结果将通过同行评审期刊发表、会议报告进行传播,并将研究结果摘要分发给参与者。
ACTRN12615000922572;预结果。