University of Kentucky College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; Division of General Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):540-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.022. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is associated with complications that significantly increase healthcare costs. This study explores the associations between hospital costs for VHR and surgical complication risk-assessment scores, need for cardiac or pulmonary evaluation, and smoking or obesity counseling.
An IRB-approved retrospective study of patients having undergone open VHR over 3 years was performed. Ventral Hernia Risk Score (VHRS) for surgical site occurrence and surgical site infection, and the Ventral Hernia Working Group grade were calculated for each case. Also recorded were preoperative cardiology or pulmonary evaluations, smoking cessation and weight reduction counseling, and patient goal achievement. Hospital costs were obtained from the cost accounting system for the VHR hospitalization stratified by major clinical cost drivers. Univariate regression analyses were used to compare the predictive power of the risk scores. Multivariable analysis was performed to develop a cost prediction model.
The mean cost of index VHR hospitalization was $20,700. Total and operating room costs correlated with increasing CDC wound class, VHRS surgical site infection score, VHRS surgical site occurrence score, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and Ventral Hernia Working Group (all p < 0.01). The VHRS surgical site infection scores correlated negatively with contribution margin (-280; p < 0.01). Multivariable predictors of total hospital costs for the index hospitalization included wound class, hernia defect size, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or 4, use of biologic mesh, and 2+ mesh pieces; explaining 73% of the variance in costs (p < 0.001). Weight optimization significantly reduced direct and operating room costs (p < 0.05). Cardiac evaluation was associated with increased costs.
Ventral hernia repair hospital costs are more accurately predicted by CDC wound class than VHR risk scores. A straightforward 6-factor model predicted most cost variation for VHR.
腹疝修补术(VHR)与显著增加医疗保健成本的并发症相关。本研究探讨了 VHR 的医院成本与手术并发症风险评估评分、是否需要心脏或肺部评估以及是否进行吸烟或肥胖咨询之间的关系。
对 3 年内接受开放式 VHR 的患者进行了一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究。为每个病例计算了手术部位发生和手术部位感染的腹疝风险评分(VHRS)以及腹疝工作组分级。还记录了术前心脏病学或肺病评估、戒烟和减肥咨询以及患者目标的实现情况。从 VHR 住院的成本核算系统中获取了住院费用,按主要临床成本驱动因素进行了分层。使用单变量回归分析比较了风险评分的预测能力。进行多变量分析以开发成本预测模型。
VHR 指数住院的平均费用为 20700 美元。总费用和手术室费用与 CDC 伤口分级、VHRS 手术部位感染评分、VHRS 手术部位发生评分、美国麻醉医师协会分级和腹疝工作组(均 p<0.01)的增加相关。VHRS 手术部位感染评分与边际贡献呈负相关(-280;p<0.01)。指数住院期间总住院费用的多变量预测因子包括伤口分级、疝缺损大小、年龄、美国麻醉医师协会 3 或 4 级、使用生物补片和 2+个补片;解释了成本变化的 73%(p<0.001)。体重优化显著降低了直接和手术室成本(p<0.05)。心脏评估与成本增加相关。
与 VHR 风险评分相比,CDC 伤口分级更能准确预测腹疝修复的医院成本。一个简单的 6 因素模型预测了 VHR 的大部分成本变化。