• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜下 Bankart 与开放 Latarjet 治疗原发性肩关节不稳定的成本效益比较。

The cost-effectiveness of the arthroscopic Bankart versus open Latarjet in the treatment of primary shoulder instability.

机构信息

Boston Shoulder Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Cooper Bone and Joint Institute, Camden, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6S):S2-S9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.013. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.013
PMID:29307674
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the arthroscopic Bankart and the open Latarjet in the treatment of primary shoulder instability.

METHODS

This cost-effectiveness study used a Markov decision chain and Monte-Carlo simulation. Existing literature was reviewed to determine the survivorship and complication rates of these procedures. Health utility states (EQ-5D and quality-adjusted life-years) of the Bankart and Latarjet were prospectively collected. Using these variables, the Monte-Carlo simulation was modeled 100,000 times.

RESULTS

In reviewing the literature, the overall recurrence rate is 14% after the arthroscopic Bankart and 8% after the open Latarjet. Postoperative health utility states were equal between the 2 procedures (mean EQ-5D, 0.930; P = .775). The Monte-Carlo simulation showed that the Bankart had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4214 and the Latarjet had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4681 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Both the arthroscopic Bankart and open Latarjet are highly cost-effective; however, the Bankart is more cost-effective than the Latarjet, primarily because of a lower health utility state after a failed Latarjet. Ultimately, the clinical scenario may favor Latarjet (ie, critical glenoid bone loss) in certain circumstances, and decisions should be made on a case by case basis.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在对关节镜 Bankart 和开放 Latarjet 治疗原发性肩关节不稳定进行成本效果分析。

方法

本成本效果研究采用 Markov 决策链和 Monte-Carlo 模拟。回顾现有文献,确定这些手术的存活率和并发症发生率。前瞻性收集 Bankart 和 Latarjet 的健康效用状态(EQ-5D 和质量调整生命年)。使用这些变量,对 Monte-Carlo 模拟进行了 10 万次建模。

结果

在文献回顾中,关节镜 Bankart 后的总体复发率为 14%,开放 Latarjet 后的复发率为 8%。两种手术的术后健康效用状态相当(平均 EQ-5D,0.930;P=0.775)。Monte-Carlo 模拟显示 Bankart 的增量成本效果比为 4214 美元,Latarjet 的增量成本效果比为 4681 美元(P<0.001)。

结论

关节镜 Bankart 和开放 Latarjet 均具有高度成本效果,但 Bankart 比 Latarjet 更具成本效果,主要是因为 Latarjet 失败后健康效用状态较低。最终,在某些情况下,临床情况可能有利于 Latarjet(即,临界肩胛盂骨丢失),应根据具体情况做出决策。

相似文献

1
The cost-effectiveness of the arthroscopic Bankart versus open Latarjet in the treatment of primary shoulder instability.关节镜下 Bankart 与开放 Latarjet 治疗原发性肩关节不稳定的成本效益比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6S):S2-S9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.013. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet reconstruction in anterior shoulder instability.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术与开放式 Latarjet 重建术治疗肩关节前向不稳定的成本效果分析。
Int Orthop. 2023 Jul;47(7):1771-1777. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05736-7. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
3
Long-Term Restoration of Anterior Shoulder Stability: A Retrospective Analysis of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet Procedure.长期恢复肩关节前向稳定性:关节镜下 Bankart 修复与开放式 Latarjet 手术的回顾性分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Dec 7;98(23):1954-1961. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01398.
4
Recurrence and Revision Rates With Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Compared With the Latarjet Procedure in Competitive Rugby Players With Glenohumeral Instability and a Glenoid Bone Loss <20.在肩盂骨量丢失<20 的伴有盂肱关节不稳定的竞技性橄榄球运动员中,与 Latarjet 术式相比,关节镜下 Bankart 修复的复发和翻修率
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;49(4):866-872. doi: 10.1177/0363546520988154. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
Arthroscopic Bankart repair associated with subscapularis augmentation (ASA) versus open Latarjet to treat recurrent anterior shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone loss: clinical comparison of two series.关节镜下Bankart修复联合肩胛下肌增强术(ASA)与开放性Latarjet手术治疗伴有中度肩胛盂骨丢失的复发性肩关节前脱位:两个系列的临床比较
Musculoskelet Surg. 2017 Apr;101(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s12306-016-0446-8. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
6
Return to Sport After Surgical Treatment for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.术后前肩不稳的重返运动:系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1507-1515. doi: 10.1177/0363546518780934. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
7
Long-term Results of the Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Older Than 40 Years: A Comparison With the Open Latarjet Procedure.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术治疗 40 岁以上复发性肩关节前向不稳定患者的长期疗效:与开放 Latarjet 手术的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(9):2090-2096. doi: 10.1177/0363546520931090. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
8
Open Latarjet procedure for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair.关节镜下Bankart修复失败后的开放性Latarjet手术
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Feb;101(1):35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
9
Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability.使用术前三维计算机断层扫描定量评估肩关节不稳时的肩胛盂骨丢失情况。
Arthroscopy. 2008 Apr;24(4):376-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.10.008. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
10
Latarjet, Bristow, and Eden-Hybinette procedures for anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and quantitative synthesis of the literature.用于治疗肩关节前脱位的拉塔热、布里斯托和伊登-希比内特手术:文献的系统评价与定量综合分析
Arthroscopy. 2014 Sep;30(9):1184-211. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Arthroscopic Bankart repair with or without remplissage: a single-institution cost comparison.关节镜下Bankart修复术(伴或不伴关节囊填充):单机构成本比较
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Apr 29;35(1):175. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04274-9.
2
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Long-Term Follow-up Study.关节镜下Bankart修复术与关节镜下Latarjet手术治疗肩关节前向不稳的配对长期随访研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Mar 14;13(3):23259671241313474. doi: 10.1177/23259671241313474. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus nonoperative management for first-time anterior shoulder instability: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
关节镜下Bankart修复术与初次前肩不稳的非手术治疗:成本效益分析。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Feb;16(1):59-67. doi: 10.1177/17585732231187123. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
4
Outcomes of the Latarjet procedure in female patients: A case series and matched-pair analysis.女性患者Latarjet手术的结果:病例系列及配对分析。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Feb;16(1):76-84. doi: 10.1177/17585732231217170. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
5
What keeps a shoulder stable - Is there an ideal method for anterior stabilisation?是什么维持肩部稳定——是否存在理想的前路稳定方法?
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Feb;16(1):4-7. doi: 10.1177/17585732231224699. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
6
Current Evidence Regarding Shoulder Instability in the Paediatric and Adolescent Population.关于儿童和青少年人群肩部不稳定的当前证据
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 26;13(3):724. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030724.
7
Is Arthroscopic Latarjet a Cost-Effective Procedure? A Decision Analysis.关节镜下Latarjet手术是否具有成本效益?一项决策分析。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(1):12-18. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.73800.3430.
8
Shoulder conditions and health related quality of life and utility: a current concepts review.肩部疾病与健康相关生活质量及效用:当前概念综述
JSES Int. 2021 Nov 20;6(1):167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.10.006. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Primary Bankart Repair Versus Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction in Patients with Subcritical Bone Loss: A Cost-Utility Analysis.亚临界骨量丢失患者的初次Bankart修复与关节镜下解剖性盂重建:成本效用分析
JB JS Open Access. 2021 Oct 21;6(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00067. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
10
Evidence-based Risk Stratification for Sport Medicine Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic.基于证据的 COVID-19 大流行期间运动医学操作的风险分层。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Oct 1;4(10):e20.00083. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00083.