• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Using multi-attribute decision-making approaches in the selection of a hospital management system.

作者信息

Arasteh Mohammad Ali, Shamshirband Shahaboddin, Yee Por Lip

机构信息

Department of Information Technology, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

Department for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2018;26(2):279-295. doi: 10.3233/THC-170947.

DOI:10.3233/THC-170947
PMID:29309042
Abstract

The most appropriate organizational software is always a real challenge for managers, especially, the IT directors. The illustration of the term "enterprise software selection", is to purchase, create, or order a software that; first, is best adapted to require of the organization; and second, has suitable price and technical support. Specifying selection criteria and ranking them, is the primary prerequisite for this action. This article provides a method to evaluate, rank, and compare the available enterprise software for choosing the apt one. The prior mentioned method is constituted of three-stage processes. First, the method identifies the organizational requires and assesses them. Second, it selects the best method throughout three possibilities; indoor-production, buying software, and ordering special software for the native use. Third, the method evaluates, compares and ranks the alternative software. The third process uses different methods of multi attribute decision making (MADM), and compares the consequent results. Based on different characteristics of the problem; several methods had been tested, namely, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTURE), and easy weight method. After all, we propose the most practical method for same problems.

摘要

相似文献

1
Using multi-attribute decision-making approaches in the selection of a hospital management system.
Technol Health Care. 2018;26(2):279-295. doi: 10.3233/THC-170947.
2
Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.一种用于ETL软件选择的集成多准则决策AHP-TOPSIS方法的应用。
Springerplus. 2016 Mar 2;5:263. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1888-z. eCollection 2016.
3
Identification of key factors in consumers' adoption behavior of intelligent medical terminals based on a hybrid modified MADM model for product improvement.基于混合改进多属性决策模型的智能医疗终端消费者采纳行为关键因素识别以进行产品改进
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:68-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
A modified TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) applied to choosing appropriate selection methods in ongoing surveillance for Avian Influenza in Canada.一种改进的逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)应用于加拿大禽流感持续监测中选择合适的筛选方法。
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Apr 1;165:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
5
Compatibility and correlation of multi-attribute decision making: a case of industrial relocation.多属性决策的兼容性与相关性:以产业转移为例
Ann Oper Res. 2022 Feb 28:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04603-9.
6
Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Solve Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Hospital.综合多准则决策方法解决供应商选择问题:医院案例研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Oct 10;2019:5614892. doi: 10.1155/2019/5614892. eCollection 2019.
7
Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP and TOPSIS.基于层次分析法(AHP)和理想解法(TOPSIS)集成的开源电子病历软件包评估与选择
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Feb;53:390-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
8
Ranking the strategies for Indian medical tourism sector through the integration of SWOT analysis and TOPSIS method.通过整合SWOT分析和TOPSIS方法对印度医疗旅游部门的策略进行排名。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Oct 9;30(8):668-679. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2016-0073.
9
Evaluating and prioritizing hospital service quality.评估医院服务质量并确定其优先级。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Mar 11;32(2):332-346. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2018-0082.
10
A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study.一种多阶段模糊决策框架评估合适的废水处理系统:案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(38):53507-53519. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14116-w. Epub 2021 May 25.