Suppr超能文献

在爱荷华州,对于中位数患者和中位数外科医生,初始门诊手术后连续手术之间的年数与天数。

Years Versus Days Between Successive Surgeries, After an Initial Outpatient Procedure, for the Median Patient Versus the Median Surgeon in the State of Iowa.

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):787-793. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002774.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previously, we studied the relative importance of different institutional interventions that the largest hospital in Iowa could take to grow the anesthesia department's outpatient surgical care. Most (>50%) patients having elective surgery had not previously had surgery at the hospital. Patient perioperative experience was unimportant for influencing total anesthesia workload and numbers of patients. More important was the availability of surgical clinic appointments within several days. These results would be generalizable if the median time from surgery to a patient's next surgical procedure was large (eg, >2 years), among all hospitals in Iowa with outpatient surgery, and without regard to the hospital where the next procedure was performed.

METHODS

There were 37,172 surgical cases at hospital outpatient departments of any of the 117 hospitals in Iowa from July 1, 2013, to September 30, 2013. Data extracted about each case included its intraoperative work relative value units. The 37,172 cases were matched to all inpatient and outpatient records for the next 2 years statewide using patient linkage identifiers; from these were determined whether the patient had surgery again within 2 years. Furthermore, the cases' 1820 surgeons were matched to the surgeon's next outpatient or inpatient case, both including and excluding other cases performed on the date of the original case.

RESULTS

By patient, the median time to their next surgical case, either outpatient or inpatient, exceeded 2 years, tested with weighting by intraoperative relative value units and repeated when unweighted (both P < .0001). Specifically, with weighting, 65.9% (99% confidence interval [CI], 65.2%-66.5%) of the patients had no other surgery within 2 years, at any hospital in the state. The median time exceeded 2 years for multiple categories of patients and similar measures of time to next surgery (all P < .01). In comparison, by surgeon, the median time to the next outpatient surgical case was 1 calendar day (99% CI, 0-1 day). The median was 3 days to the next date with at least 1 outpatient case (99% CI, 3-3 days).

CONCLUSIONS

The median time to the next surgery was >2 years for patients versus 1 day for surgeons. Thus, although patients' experiences are an important attribute of quality of care, surgeons' experiences are orders of magnitude more important from the vantage point of marketing and growth of an anesthesia practice.

摘要

背景

此前,我们研究了爱荷华州最大医院可以采取的不同制度干预措施对扩大麻醉部门门诊手术护理的相对重要性。大多数(>50%)接受择期手术的患者之前并未在该医院接受过手术。患者围手术期体验对影响总麻醉工作量和患者数量并不重要。更重要的是几天内有外科诊所预约。如果所有进行门诊手术的爱荷华州医院的手术到下次手术的中位时间较长(例如,>2 年),并且无论下次手术在何处进行,这些结果都具有普遍性。

方法

2013 年 7 月 1 日至 2013 年 9 月 30 日,爱荷华州 117 家医院的门诊外科部门共有 37172 例手术。从每个病例中提取的数据包括其术中相对工作值单位。使用患者链接标识符将这 37172 例病例与全州范围内接下来 2 年的所有住院和门诊记录相匹配;从中确定患者是否在 2 年内再次接受手术。此外,将这些病例的 1820 名外科医生与外科医生的下一次门诊或住院病例相匹配,包括和不包括原始病例日期当天进行的其他病例。

结果

从患者的角度来看,无论是门诊还是住院,他们下一次手术的中位时间都超过了 2 年,这是通过术中相对值单位加权和未加权时的重复测试得出的(两者 P<0.0001)。具体来说,加权后,65.9%(99%置信区间[CI],65.2%-66.5%)的患者在州内任何医院 2 年内没有接受其他手术。对于多个类别的患者和类似的下一次手术时间测量,中位数都超过了 2 年(所有 P<0.01)。相比之下,从外科医生的角度来看,下一次门诊手术的中位时间为 1 个日历日(99%CI,0-1 天)。下一次至少有 1 例门诊病例的日期为 3 天(99%CI,3-3 天)。

结论

患者下一次手术的中位时间>2 年,而外科医生下一次门诊手术的中位时间为 1 天。因此,尽管患者的体验是护理质量的一个重要属性,但从营销和麻醉实践增长的角度来看,外科医生的体验重要性要高出几个数量级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验