Silva-Batista Carla, Corcos Daniel M, Kanegusuku Hélcio, Piemonte Maria Elisa Pimentel, Gobbi Lilian Teresa Bucken, de Lima-Pardini Andrea C, de Mello Marco Túlio, Forjaz Claudia L M, Ugrinowitsch Carlos
Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Strength Training, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo at São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Physical Therapy & Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Gait Posture. 2018 Mar;61:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.027. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
Resistance training with instability (RTI) uses exercises with high motor complexity that impose high postural control and cognitive demands that may be important for improving postural instability and fear of falling in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD). Here, we hypothesized that: 1) RTI will be more effective than resistance training (RT) in improving balance (Balance Evaluation Systems Test [BESTest] and overall stability index [Biodex Balance System]) and fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale-International [FES-I] score) of subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD); and 2) changes in BESTest and FES-I after RTI will be associated with changes in cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] score - previously published) induced by RTI. Thirty-nine subjects with moderate PD were randomly assigned to a nonexercising control, RT, and RTI groups. While RT and RTI groups performed progressive RT twice a week for 12 weeks, the RTI group added progressive unstable devices to increase motor complexity of the resistance exercises. There were significant group × time interactions for BESTest, overall stability index, and FES-I scores (P < 0.05). Only RTI improved BESTest, overall stability index and FES-I scores, and RTI was more effective than RT in improving biomechanical constraints and stability in gait (BESTest sections) at post-training (P < 0.05). There were strong correlations between relative changes in BESTest and MoCA (r = 0.72, P = 0.005), and FES-I and MoCA (r = -0.75, P = 0.003) after RTI. Due to the increased motor complexity in RTI, RTI is recommended for improving balance and fear of falling, which are associated with improvement in cognitive function of PD.
不稳定状态下的阻力训练(RTI)采用具有高运动复杂性的练习,这些练习对姿势控制和认知要求较高,这可能对改善帕金森病(PD)患者的姿势不稳和跌倒恐惧很重要。在此,我们假设:1)在改善帕金森病(PD)患者的平衡(平衡评估系统测试[BESTest]和整体稳定性指数[Biodex平衡系统])和跌倒恐惧(国际跌倒效能量表[FES-I]评分)方面,RTI将比阻力训练(RT)更有效;2)RTI后BESTest和FES-I的变化将与RTI引起的认知功能变化(蒙特利尔认知评估[MoCA]评分 - 先前已发表)相关。39名中度PD患者被随机分配到非运动对照组、RT组和RTI组。RT组和RTI组每周进行两次渐进性阻力训练,持续12周,而RTI组增加了渐进性不稳定装置,以增加阻力训练的运动复杂性。BESTest、整体稳定性指数和FES-I评分存在显著的组×时间交互作用(P<0.05)。只有RTI改善了BESTest、整体稳定性指数和FES-I评分,并且在训练后,RTI在改善生物力学限制和步态稳定性(BESTest部分)方面比RT更有效(P<0.05)。RTI后BESTest与MoCA的相对变化之间(r = 0.72,P = 0.005)以及FES-I与MoCA的相对变化之间(r = -0.75,P = 0.003)存在强相关性。由于RTI中运动复杂性增加,建议采用RTI来改善平衡和跌倒恐惧,这与PD患者认知功能的改善相关。