• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用临床决策分析对基于mFOLFOX6的一线方案治疗不可切除的晚期或复发性结直肠癌进行经济学评估]

[Economic Evaluation of mFOLFOX6-based First-line Regimens for Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Using Clinical Decision Analysis].

作者信息

Shida Toshihiro, Endo Yuji, Shiraishi Tadashi, Yoshioka Takashi, Suzuki Kaoru, Kobayashi Yuka, Ono Yuki, Ito Toshinori, Inoue Tadao

机构信息

Division of Pharmacy, Yamagata University Hospital.

Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University.

出版信息

Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018;138(1):83-90. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.17-00159.

DOI:10.1248/yakushi.17-00159
PMID:29311468
Abstract

We evaluated four representative chemotherapy regimens for unresectable advanced or recurrent KRAS-wild type colorectal cancer: mFOLFOX6, mFOLFOX6+bevacizumab (Bmab), cetuximab (Cmab), or panitumumab (Pmab). We employed a decision analysis method in combination with clinical and economic evidence. The health outcomes of the regimens were analyzed on the basis of overall and progression-free survival. The data were drawn from the literature on randomized controlled clinical trials of the above-mentioned drugs. The total costs of the regimens were calculated on the basis of direct costs obtained from the medical records of patients diagnosed with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer at Yamagata University Hospital and Yamagata Prefecture Central Hospital. Cost effectiveness was analyzed using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. The study was designed from the viewpoint of public medical care. The MCMC analysis revealed that expected life months and expected cost were 20 months/3,527,119 yen for mFOLFOX6, 27 months/8,270,625 yen for mFOLFOX6+Bmab, 29 months/13,174,6297 yen for mFOLFOX6+Cmab, and 6 months/12,613,445 yen for mFOLFOX6+Pmab. Incremental costs per effectiveness ratios per life month against mFOLFOX6 were 637,592 yen for mFOLFOX6+Bmab, 1,075,162 yen for mFOLFOX6+Cmab, and 587,455 yen for mFOLFOX6+Pmab. Compared to the conventional mFOLFOX6 regimen, molecular-targeted drug regimens provide better health outcomes, but the cost increases accordingly. mFOLFOX 6+Pmab is the most cost-effective regimen among those surveyed in this study.

摘要

我们评估了四种用于不可切除的晚期或复发性KRAS野生型结直肠癌的代表性化疗方案:mFOLFOX6、mFOLFOX6+贝伐单抗(Bmab)、西妥昔单抗(Cmab)或帕尼单抗(Pmab)。我们采用了一种决策分析方法,并结合临床和经济证据。根据总生存期和无进展生存期分析了这些方案的健康结局。数据来自上述药物随机对照临床试验的文献。根据从山形大学医院和山形县中央医院诊断为不可切除的晚期或复发性结直肠癌患者的病历中获得的直接成本,计算了这些方案的总成本。使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)方法分析成本效益。该研究是从公共医疗保健的角度设计的。MCMC分析显示,mFOLFOX6的预期生命月数和预期成本分别为20个月/3,527,119日元,mFOLFOX6+Bmab为27个月/8,270,625日元,mFOLFOX6+Cmab为29个月/13,174,6297日元,mFOLFOX6+Pmab为6个月/12,613,445日元。与mFOLFOX6相比,mFOLFOX6+Bmab每生命月的增量成本效益比为637,592日元,mFOLFOX6+Cmab为1,075,162日元,mFOLFOX6+Pmab为587,455日元。与传统的mFOLFOX6方案相比,分子靶向药物方案可提供更好的健康结局,但成本也相应增加。在本研究调查的方案中,mFOLFOX 6+Pmab是最具成本效益的方案。

相似文献

1
[Economic Evaluation of mFOLFOX6-based First-line Regimens for Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Using Clinical Decision Analysis].[使用临床决策分析对基于mFOLFOX6的一线方案治疗不可切除的晚期或复发性结直肠癌进行经济学评估]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018;138(1):83-90. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.17-00159.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.帕尼单抗联合mFOLFOX6与贝伐单抗联合mFOLFOX6用于一线治疗野生型RAS转移性结直肠癌患者的成本效益分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Nov;50(16):2791-801. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.在西班牙背景下,帕尼单抗联合mFOLFOX6与贝伐单抗联合mFOLFOX6用于野生型RAS转移性结直肠癌患者一线治疗的PEAK试验的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2017 Jun;20(6):574-584. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1285780. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of FOLFIRI-Based First-Line Regimens for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Clinical Decision Analysis.基于临床决策分析的转移性结直肠癌一线治疗 FOLFIRI 方案的成本效果分析。
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2024 May;51(5):541-547.
5
[Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus mFOLFOX6 Compared to Bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOX6 for First-line Treatment of Patients with Wild-type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer--Czech Republic Model Adaptation].帕尼单抗联合mFOLFOX6与贝伐单抗联合mFOLFOX6用于野生型RAS转移性结直肠癌患者一线治疗的成本效益分析——捷克共和国模型适配
Klin Onkol. 2015;28(4):265-72. doi: 10.14735/amko2015265.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗日本转移性结直肠癌的成本效益分析。
Clin Ther. 2007 Oct;29(10):2256-67. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.10.013.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial.基于 TAILOR 试验的西妥昔单抗联合化疗一线治疗 RAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌的成本效果分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 12;10(2):e030738. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030738.
8
PEAK: a randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer.PEAK:一项随机、多中心的 II 期研究,评估帕尼单抗联合改良氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂(mFOLFOX6)或贝伐珠单抗联合 mFOLFOX6 治疗既往未经治疗、不可切除、野生型 KRAS 外显子 2 转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 20;32(21):2240-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2473. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.贝伐珠单抗联合卡培他滨维持治疗转移性结直肠癌的成本效果分析
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):236-242. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5070.
10
Cost-effectiveness of RAS screening before monoclonal antibodies therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer based on FIRE3 Study.基于FIRE3研究的转移性结直肠癌单克隆抗体治疗前RAS检测的成本效益
Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(11):1577-84. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2015.1095398. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of FOLFOX6+Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOX6+Cetuximab in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Patients in Shiraz, Iran.FOLFOX6+Bevacizumab 与 FOLFOX6+Cetuximab 方案治疗伊朗设拉子 IV 期结直肠癌患者的成本效益分析。
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231180679. doi: 10.1177/10732748231180679.
2
Exploring the Safety, Effectiveness, and Cost-Effectiveness of a Chinese Patent Medicine (Fufang E'jiao Syrup) for Alleviating Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial.探索一种中药复方阿胶浆缓解癌因性疲乏的安全性、有效性和成本效果:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心试验方案。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:15347354211002919. doi: 10.1177/15347354211002919.